User

You are not spoon feeding me anything, these are questions. Stupid ones that conflate the appearance of something and actually being something. Grow up. Get some integrity. Liar. Your lack of integrity is a you problem. That is not what the law called for.

It is so tiresome dealing with this ignorance. You are on here claiming things about this law... and you need me to get it for you? " The products must be available to all menstruating students in restrooms regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12 according to a plan developed by the school district. " https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/text.php?number=HF44&type=bill&version=1&session=ls93&session_year=2023&session_number=0 Here is the fact check on this too: The bill’s lead author said it enables transgender students to access menstrual products without having to ask for them. https://wisconsinwatch.org/2024/08/tim-walz-menstrual-products-minnesota-schools-bathrooms/

That is their choice to look like a man or a boy while in reality they are a girl.

It is an outright lie. He was demoted because he failed to meet the conditions of being a CSM. He knows that. Yet he still brags about retiring as something he never earned and was demoted from.

This may have made sense in your head, but for those of us who don't peddle in this gender isn't sex BS like you do, you will have to provide some more details. Keep in mind, you still can't even define what a woman is in any meaningful way either.

Nope. They shouldn't dress like a man and look like a man then.

It would be better for us not to play to kids delusions and allow them to use restrooms of the opposing sex. Gender is not "assigned." People are born as boys or girls. With some very rare genetic exceptions, which is not what we are talking about. You "honestly" think that... LOL Of course you do. Of course you do.

Yes, it does. The Democrats who passed it bragged on this for trans kids. The author of the bill even said as much. If the law states (it does) that menstrual products be made available in restrooms to ALL students who use them... that includes girls who think they are boys using the boy's restrooms. Why you folks insist on denying apparent facts like this is beyond me.

Yes, Walz has repeatedly bragged about retiring as a command sergeant major as well as alluding to being in combat theaters. He served honorably, but has lied about what he was when he did.

They literally said to make menstrual products available in restrooms of those who need them... that includes the boy's restroom.

Well, at least you are honest enough to admit it is a tactic for her to hide from the media because you know the answers she gives will be bad.

Really, which law is that exactly? The one passed in 1872? Is that really what you are trying to blame on "Republicans" for saying unborn children in IVF are considered children? No, this has been the culmination of over a hundred years of law and legal precedent. And to the point here... these IVF clinics should in fact be doing more to ensure the protection of these humans. They did in fact destroy them through negligence and dropping them on the floor because some fool could open up the container and did so with his bare hands. Do you think the parents who entrusted that IVF clinic should have no standing to challenge this in any way or just that it goes too far in saying they are children that were harmed?

The point is that you engage wth some of the folks on here who are the absolute worst, like their posts, then tell those same folks to ignore others with you... Yes, you have started responding to a couple of things I have said lately... which is why I said mostly ignore. Its just a childish game you are playing where you are constantly threatening to ignore me and others and then trying to convince others to do the same. Especially when you are engaging with folks who are some of the worst offenders at doing the things you claim to not like.

Again, you started with extremes. You are in fact talking about isolationism. You just got done saying, after I brought up Somali pirates: "But we do not need to worry what Somalians do" Then when challenged, now all of a sudden you are OK with blowing them to bits: You have to worry about what Somalians are doing when their pirates are attacking cargo ships... Trade is fine... and how do we protect trade? How do we protect our strategic interests? Taiwan is making most of the chips we use, so... we don't meddle in their affairs while China invades or what? You just got done saying to blow up the pirates... how do we blow up the pirates without meddling in the affairs of other nations? You started this thread with a woefully naive and extremely simplistic view, I am challenging that view.

No worries, you were the one who jumped in here. Now you run away when called out. I hope you find that atheist forum you are looking for where no one will mention anything about religion and offend you.

Are you for real? I just can't with this gaslighting as you mostly ignore me and like the posts of folks that literally do everything you are here saying you don't like.

More like I have too much intelligence... If you were being honest, you would admit I was not making any religious-based arguments here.

That doesn't mean the ferilized eggs are any less considered life. No different than if you were in a burning building and you could save your family, you wife and kids... or a room full of 100 strangers. If you choose to save your family, that doesn't mean the 100 strangers were not humans with any significance with regard to their being living beings. The point is, we can place reasonable restrictions on IVF that demands they have some regard for the lives they are creating while still doing IVF. It is the same reason why we have standards for the medical practice and Hospitals are not just some moldy basement room with blood stains and doctors are not just smoking and never washing their hands while they deliver babies and then leave the mothers laying on the floor in their own poo... no, we demand better so women and babies don't die needlessly during child birth. Will we ever get folks like you to admit they have some significance as human life that deserves protection?

You started with the extreme isolationist position here. I did not take them to the extreme, I am using the same extreme to give you the answer to your question. So, we don't need to worry that pirates are intercepting global shipping routes? Do I really need to explain to you how that impacts us? Is your position a true 100% isolation one where we stop all global trade and just wall ourselves in? Accepting these things doesn't mean you have to support open borders.

You could really change things up and actually admit you were wrong.

You can't have a normal pregnancy without the deaths of the unborn or the mother. That doesn't mean we outlaw pregnancy... The disregard for life the practice has now is not the way it must be done, where they create 20 embryos and pick and choose what they think are the best and destroy the rest. Lousianna has had some restrictions like this in place for decades now, and IVF is still happening there.

You are steering the discussion in a different direction now. My personal opinion on this vs what the party position currently is. The Hospital is going to do what they are going to do... that is not a reflection on Republicans or what the party in general supported there. The IVF industry should be regulated and more care provided to the process. You can still support IVF, but also ensure it is done in a better way. They are in fact playing with creating life and it should be respected as such.

Where have I made any religious-based arguments here? The only thing clear is that you have no idea what you are talking about.

They don't need to. The status quo already favors IVF. It is not a matter of how confident I am or I guess we will see. I gave you concrete answers here. I gave you the party platform, I gave you examples of the party supporting IVF, and even you provided one.

Dear Diary...