User

Well, the same freedom of speech you decry as being bad you certainly enjoy using here to say the garbage and lies you are saying. Think about that. Again... you are conflating freedom of religion with rape and murder. Freedom of religion doesn't mean rape and murder are OK. There is a hierarchy of rights because sometimes they conflict. Freedom of religion stops where it impacts others freedoms, like those to live and be free from bodily harm. Its the same concept that you have freedom of speech and people also have private property rights, which means you can't be on their property without their permission exercising your freedom of speech... These are pretty basic concepts to grasp. You seem more interested in your obsessive hatred for religion than having an honest intelligent discussion here.

At 25 weeks you certainly do. Get some glasses. So are you. I am the one willing to speak out about it. Says the guy who sees nothing... Don't need to. You must have lost a lot before you ever started with me...

No, look who I was responding to. No, you don't. Only until you don't. Its a circular argument. I have eyes, yes. I am glad you agree. Circular.

Really? Sure doesn't seem like you are on the Ukrainian side at all:

What do you mean... the big picture? They are in a war against Russia. At the very least this is going to force Russia to have to move forces to repel AND if Ukraine continues to push Russia like this, it forces Russia to have to rethink their entire deployment of forces to be able to repel such attacks. Moral boosters are a big thing, just as demoralizing the Russians is also a big thing. You might as well sit here arguing it is a waste for Ukraine to be fighting back at all. Is that what you are getting at? Should they just surrender?

You are welcome!

Yes you are. I am glad you agree with me, that as long as the choice is lawfully done BEFORE a woman gets pregnant, that is within the law and to be respected. The one I just said. Because its a circle.

I am not the one confused as to what a woman is here... you are.

Logic, reason...

I am glad to know you think my posting is holier than yours.

Perfection or infallibility is not a prerequisite to loyalty.

Nope. You are the one constantly saying you respect their right to an abortion... but you don't when you say only to 24 weeks. You only kind of respect it. I already made it: "but just not enough to care to do anything. " All you had to say was, yes. This is all circular. What if we change that to 1 week? Then that is the lawful timeframe. You respect that too?

Go back and look again... Is that what you like to do with these dudes fake vaginas?

This is circular logic and a strawman. Not sure who is arguing the Constitution is "infallible" and if the Constitution includes a process for amendments... then that means it is part of whatever "infallibility" argument you are making.

Science is just a methodology comprised of numerous fields of study. You neither trust it or not, that is the entire point. You test and observe. Just because one thing in one field went wrong doesn't somehow mean science if flawed. It just means that particular study was.

Do you think Michael is willing to admit his position here was purely subjective and he can't show the connection between Trump and Project 2025?

We had already moved on to your use of the fake vagina by then.

This is such a lame argument, it is the you agree 100% with all and everything or nothing. That is not how anything works in life. When a restaurant hires someone to bus their tables, they are hiring them to bus their tables. That doesn't mean the busser can now implement all his own plans and thing the restaurant never dreamed of. Just as when a President is picking people to help run the administration, they are picked for particular reasons. Well, the alternative is for the person trying to say 3+3=7 to just admit they can't actually prove that out or that they were wrong... that is always an option too.

Was the discussion point or title of this thread: Does Trump work with the dude on executive orders? Nope. Huh? The Amendment process is part of the Constitution...

No, it is like you coming here saying 3+3 = 7. I ask you to explain how, and you just keep insisting that it does. But yeah, totally, it is just that someone has to have the last word...

Anti-vaxxers certainly do not help, but it is when those medical professionals lie and exaggerate that pushes more folks into the skeptic camp. This pandemic did not help the cause at all, and that was not the fault of the anti-vaxxers. They just exploited it.

You brought up gay. So, which is it? Are transwomen really women or not?

What if they want an abortion at 25 weeks? Oh, well, you didn't really mean it when you said: "I don't like the idea of abortion." Not at 25 weeks. Not at 25 weeks.

Yes, humans make mistakes. The science was not the problem here, nor "science" in general. They had the data that those O-rings were not rated for the temperatures that it got down to... and they ignored it.

Trump is not President. This was not created by his cabinet member. You are having a real problem here understanding that disconnect. Yeah, you keep showing how Trump is associated with one of the dudes who created Project 2025, but you don't even show the connection to Project 2025. Ah yes, classic. You want to make the assertions, just not defend them.