User

It was no test, just no idea why you brought it up. Hence the question about supporting funding for this education to show them the ultrasound. No, I never said this would fix anything. I said accurately that it would certainly reduce abortions. Isn't that a good thing? OK great, so you do understand the concept of both supporting abortions only under certain contexts and killing for self defense being OK.

Are you a vegan now opposed to killing animals for food? The point we were getting at here were methods to prevent unwanted pregnancy so as to avoid abortions. Well, educating women on what is actually inside of them also reduces abortions. Are you guys really such a death cult that you don't want women to have information that might lead them to not get an abortion? That is the only killing you think is OK? Like, if someone is going to rape your wife or daughter, you are just going to stand there and watch?

So, you think all killing is OK for any reason, because any standards are hypocrisy... Seriously, your comments on this are beyond dumb.

Who are you trying to convince here? Why are you wasting your time? You have already established you don't understand or care to understand how a forum like this works. I figured you wouldn't honestly answer the question.

You should be more worried about your own knowledge on these subjects before commenting next time.

Typical liberal arguments... First you lie and claim it isn't happening, then you shift to saying who cares. Clearly not. They are still unearthing more and more videos of him

I provide responses, you don't like them... maybe online forums are not your thing.

Just a sad disgusting ploy by you to shove the LGBTQ madness onto children and families.

Can't like, ran out again. I figured it would end up being something like this. The people on here know what they are doing is disingenuous. It is just a dishonest game for them.

If you were really tired of lying and tricks, you would stop using them. Bring what on? You can't even respond directly to people.

Here is a similar question for you. Would you support programs providing ultrasounds of babies before they are aborted so women can see their unborn child before aborting them?

I am just fine with birth control being available and education and policies aimed at helping folks prevent unwanted pregnancies BEFORE they happen. But... so what? A marginal reduction in abortions doesn't change that there are still a ton of abortions. For as long as folks on the left push to normalize abortions, destigmatize them, and push dehumanizing language or other arguments saying the unborn child has no right to life and is just a clump of cells... there are still going to be far too many folks using abortion as a convenient way to not be pregnant.

Oh... what Mr. just a Devils advocate? You mindlessly cite crap and you have no clue what it is. Just like Yazan Al Kafarneh. That was not just some kid that starved to death because there was some starvation level event happening... the kid had cerebral palsy and needed a special diet... the kid already had a weakened immune system and died of a respiratory infection, complicated by malnutrition. That did not happen because Israel is starving the population and not letting food in.

So, after all your lies and bogus comments... now you shift to trying to say no one should use X. Looks like many millions of people watched the Trump interview and last I checked X has been growing significantly this past year and people from all over the world use it. Like it or hate it, X is the place to go for unbiased news. When Trump was almost assassinated, you couldn't hardly find anything from a Google search and what you did find was stupid crap by the mainstream media back then saying stuff like Trump fell down. On X you had instant access to video, commentary, and real news about what happened that day.

It still amazes me how folks like you jump into a discussion at the end, clearly having not read anything before now and clearly ignorant on the subject. The law literally says menstrual products in restrooms where students who need them can use them. That includes boys restrooms.

Quantify what you mean "throughout the conflict" Like, on any particular day something happened that somehow interrupted the normal daily operations of allowing food in? Not doing enough, working towards doing more, and the difficulties of getting food into a combat zone != Israel is preventing it. No one is starving to death... or the entire population would be dead by now. This war has been going on for months. It takes about 3 weeks for someone to starve to death. Obviously, a comprehensive ceasefire is not needed. What needs to happen, is if folks like you actually care, is to demand Hamas surrender.

Anyone can use X for a political platform. The mechanism he used can be used by others too. It is a feature offered. Musk has no obligation to be impartial or objective. None. You are conflating what Musk is doing and what the policies are of X.

I don't get it, they are just robot NPC's like Musk calls them. They just mindlessly react, because Tulsi Gabbard is a baddie now or can't admit to anything that might make the current administration look bad... This is not a partisan issue. We should all be concerned about the TSA doing this to someone like her of all people, and want answers.

In the absence of any of those qualifiers... I am only looking at the meaning of the word used. YOU are the one trying to interject some notion that I must presume it included one of those. In the context he used it in... you think I am choosing the dumbest one? Yeah right. Nope, his accusation was towards what Israel was doing... that doesn't mean they have to be 100% effective in doing it if one slips through the cracks. A rational human being would never have made such an outlandish assertion to begin with, chose their words more carefully, or immediately owned up to what they did after. Speaking of being dishonest... that isn't what I said he said. You are still butt hurt over the last big discussion you and I were in like this, the only ideologue here is you, thinking this was your big aha moment.

You just bounce from one outlandish claim and lies to the next thing. Advertisers don't need cause to avoid anything... they can avoid all they want to. What companies can't do is collude with each other in the marketplace in certain circumstances under anti-trust laws. Not sure what legal weight Musk will have here, I am no expert, but on the surface it certainly doesn't look very good when you have corporations colluding together to boycott certain agencies like they did with X. Now, acting on their own, they can do as they please... They have... DeSantis endorsed Trump as soon as he dropped out and has been actively supporting the campaign.

Yes, it is pretty clear being honest is not worth it to you.

You have not been engaging honestly here with us anyhow or giving us a genuine discussion before now.

Here you go:

Keep reading, try again.

So, this is your confession. You started in this thread pushing lies about what this was and what was happening. You hide from our repeated responses to you pointing out the facts. You are the one who is not interested in reason, meaningful, or rational discussion.