User

Yes, facts like having a fake vagina doesn't make your boyfriend a woman.

But your boyfriend trying to steal being a woman with his fake vagina isn't... ROFL No valor in that.

Even now, you keep running, trying to distract. Coward.

LOL, its just one thing you keep running from, because you are a coward.

Pleas for validation... says the guy who insists we consider a fake vagina real so your boyfriend feels better about himself.

What do you care? You seem to be just fine with the behavior. I say again, you can dish it out on this forum, but run like a coward and cry when it is given back to you.

This is some awful logic. Rejecting the LGBTQ flag is not a denial of existence. Acceptance of a flag does not define their existence. And that symbol has become incredibly divisive, just as you are using it right now to brow beat others into accepting it.

Thanks for admitting you are a stalker.

Oh wait, is this where you try to tell me you did not compare anything to anything as you bring up carpet bombing for like the 4th time now? FFS, you are a pathological liar.

You still sticking with this story? Poor Hezbollah, wanting to defeat Israeli signals intelligence, put out the word to start using pagers for this purpose... ordering pagers for this purpose, was really just trying to supply their fire crews and hospital workers with a means of communication to help people. Yeah right.

Oh man... your behavior is what you would call stalking. Get help.

He offered to debate her several times, she refused.

I would be curious to know how you define anti-trans, because more often than not, that is a garbage term used to lump anyone and everyone that is not 100% on board with everything trans, including pushing this onto children under the threat of death, as being anti-trans. And yes, it almost certainly is for the benefit of the children when we are talking about protecting them from this madness. A bit ironic, as it is the trans the kids folks who not only claim it is for the children, but they push it under the threat of death, telling parents they must turn their little girls into boys or they will die! DIE! Do you want them dead?! Then we must convert them! But... of course, you don't want to talk about any of this...

Like you care. The exact same can be said about you.

Clearly this is not your position as you repeatedly insist on their having to be sure and just did again. However, if you are finally willing to concede to what is reasonable, then we can say this was a very reasonable attack on Hezbollah. Oh wait... nevermind... here you are again, demanding they be sure. OK, now I know you are just screwing with me. There is no way... no way you are this stupid, certainly you are this much of a liar.

I just did. I gave you an entire page full of quotes. The only lie is your playing dumb act now. So which is it? Did they have to reasonably know or have to know? You just tried to lie saying you never said they had to be sure and now you are saying they couldn't know, another absolutist position. Holy crap, are you delusional?! Here you go again, saying they have to be sure in the same post you are claiming you never said this... again. No "reasonable" or "reasonably" here... just "sure" You can't even keep your own story straight in the same post. I am not lying about anything. You are entirely delusional.

Just like Harris was a coward when she refused to agree to more debates?

LOL, not interested in quoting organizations that have routinely been biased against Israel and were already going after them absurdly for war crimes and whatnot. Feel free to make your own arguments or not.

Yes, if you repeatedly argue that they are not sure, your standard here is that they have to be sure. The fact that you keep playing dumb like this doesn't change that. And if you are here arguing these attacks were wrong because they can't be sure... then your standard is that they must be sure. How are you this dumb or dishonest? Except, you ignored the whole part where I went on to support my point here...

Sigh... why do folks like you have to act this way? There is almost no point in trying to discuss anything with someone like you who will just deny you said what you have clearly said. Beyond the fact that you literally have said this, your arguments have also repeatedly insisted upon it many times. " There's currently no declaration of war, there's no way to know whether or not that pager might be in the possession of a child or something like that" ... "You don't know where those pagers are going to end up. You can't be sure that you're taking out legit targets. " ... "But there's no guarantee that would happen or that some kid wouldn't happen to have daddy's pager when it went off or that it didn't go off somewhere like a gas station or on a plane or while the guy was driving a truck leading to civilian casualties without any announcement or declaration. " ... "While they were aiming for hezbolla the fact is there was a lot of randomness to the attack, others were hurt or killed including a small boy, and people just going about their lives would have been at risk of death. " ... "They didn't know who the pagers would be issued to for sure, and they didn't know that whomever they issued them to would be the ones holding them when they went off...and they coudln't be sure when they went off the person wasn't doing something that would put other people at risk. " ... "They did not know whose pocket that pager was in when it blew up. They did not know that it was in the pocket of a Hezbollah supporter. There isn't even any evidence that all of the people that were blown up were Hezbollah supporters." ... "you don't actually need me to explain what for sure means do you? They didn't know for certainty who would wind up with these pagers" ... "But there is no way they could know that that would be the only people that would get them or use them, or with certainty that that's who they would be given to. " ... " It is painfully obvious that they could not have known with certainty who the end recipients would be, or that they would all be Hezbollah." ... "But this is more random. You don't know where those pagers are going to end up. You can't be sure that you're taking out legit targets. " ... "That's just nonsense. I'm using aboslute language because i'm arguing things aren't absolute and they can't be sure? "

Don't know who... yeah right. You know why they are buying pagers, you know who is buying them, you know who they are going to. You just outlined yourself how much they did to make this work. That is targeted. This was not some random Radio Shack shipment that went to the general public.

Yeah, you are the one saying they have to be sure... that is absolutist language. I am the one pointing out nothing is for sure, it is only degrees of certainty and risk. OK great, you were never comparing this to carpet bombing and I have no dumb comparisons to argue against. It was not random. The people they were issued to were targeted. Here we go again... where you pretend the folks who are purchasing pagers to avoid Israeli signals intelligence are just normal civilians and not terrorists or militant combatants... So, your big argument now is that the Hezbollah leadership was issuing the pagers they ordered to avoid Israeli signals intelligence was to kids? Yeah right... of course, they just wanted to be able to page their kids at school to make sure they were going to be home for dinner. *eye roll* So... you are advocating for them to declare war... LOL You are conflating your claim of casualties with the few who were killed. The vast majority of those harmed were precisely the folks being targeted. Yes, this is a clear victory. The only lie here is you claiming children were targeted. Yes, you continue to advocate for Israel to declare war instead... Yes, they put a tiny amount of explosives with the people they intended of blowing up instead of dropping larger amounts of explosives all over Lebanon that would certainly have killed far more. Still waiting for you to ever explain by what rule or law you are insisting Israel must declare war by... let me know when you feel like providing that. I am tired of asking for it.

Wow... that is pretty targeted and not so random as you kept trying to argue.

Trump offered Harris several debates, including one on Fox. She refused. I guess she should have accepted before if she wanted to debate so badly.

With the way you act on here, you might as well go talk to yourself anyhow. So, oh no, please don't threaten to put me on ignore! Oh no, not that! It would save a lot of time, I can continue to correct the nonsense you say and not have to worry about getting drug into the nonsense responses you give too. As to your question, yes, my position is that humans are prone to sin and none are perfect.