User

Well, you will resort to any level of being obtuse to avoid the point, which was that it was not just "Republicans," not that I was saying Republicans had nothing to do with it at all. Going to just ignore your big straw man lie, though...

Can you show us "the claims" that said this was all coming from Maduro and taking him out would stop the entire Colombian drug trade? Talk about an epic strawman. The only BS going on here is yours, as usual. Also, your revisionist history is a lie. It was never "Republicans" as most of the world's intelligence agencies made that assessment, foreign governments agreed, it was a bipartisan analysis, contribution, and authorization for use of force. Also, it was a common sense logical deduction no less...

Come back when you can elaborate and point out the lies...

No, we correctly pointed out to you what was meant, and that he said on day 1... not that you have any care to ever engage honestly on here.

Those were emails literally to Hunter Biden regarding a business deal he was literally a part of. It was not some third party emailing someone else.

LOL, classic dishonest leftist arguments. If it is to your partisan favor it is worth every penny to engage in these things, but if not, OMG, how much is this costing?

Fraudulent? It's a baseless assertion made by a third party with no evidence. That is not evidence. As was already pointed out here, if I email someone the forum and tell them you are a pedophile. Are you a pedophile? Is that evidence you are one?

You should be embarrassed if you support butchering children like this.

There is no standard of evidence in an absurd baseless assertion that makes no sense.

"for official acts" The part you all have so much difficulty with.

"gets away with it" Yes, he got away with defending his life. As it should be.

When is this big crash happening? I want to be ready!

Except... the part you ignore is the ballot harvesting. Without photo ID to vote, with mail in ballots, now you have operatives that go out and farm ballots for people and you have no idea if they voted, they just agreed to whatever terms to have someone else grab their ballot for them, or whatever...

Owning a gun is a right... I bet you still want people to show ID to purchase one. Oh man... you better not forget your ID. Going to the bar is something you can always do, so no big deal if you forget, so, if voting is so important to you, better remember! So... if you can show ID to register, what is the big deal to show ID to vote? "No problem" https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/19-foreign-nationals-indicted-illegally-voting-2016-elections It is not a new law or concept to require ID to vote.

Most of the folks on here who support this trans kids' madness won't touch this thread with a 10-foot pole.

That Judge was a raving lunatic who wrote one of the most outlandishly absurd rulings anyone has ever seen. It will almost certainly be appealed and overturned. The point is that there was an order of removal on this man, which is why ICE picked him up in the first place.

That isn’t what the news reports, that is what his lawyer claims.

The Epstein files were not only at SDNY nor was their existence some mystery as if they only existed there. This is you stupid dishonest talking point so you can hide like the coward you are.

There is no king…

I mean... sure, if you are in the habit of believing people like Epstein.

It's no different than their fake love for the police on J6. It is just a political ruse, all talk, that will quickly evaporate when it comes to substance.

More credibility.... which means nothing.

What are you talking about? You are linking to articles over a week old, and this story is not new. The father is here illegally; he was arrested lawfully to be deported. He has chosen to take his child with him. If you want to avoid this, use the Government App to schedule your own deportation.

LOL, I figured as much. You push this garbage and have no idea what you are talking about, and no guts to put anything on the line to back it up either way. You are the equivalent of a street corner bum holding a sign saying, "The End is coming... sometime."

Where does this ruling say the king can do no wrong? It states that if the President is charged with executing the laws of the country, that can't be unlawful, because he is executing the laws. I realize this little factual nuance is too much for you folks or maybe you just don't care, because you want to push your nonsense fear-mongering talking points.