User

Well, if you were not such a coward, I already posted it here. You can easily find it yourself if you cared, but you just want to play the dumb sea lion game.

What will happen if Aliens invade?

We care enough to help them, not lie to them and tell them they have to butcher themselves to appear to be something they are not.

You left of the part that mattered there... ACTIVIST

And if Aliens invade!

Irrelevant. Irrelevant. Not a fact. A Judge reviewed the evidence and found sufficient grounds to issue a warrant. The warrant specifically identified the laws under investigation and the scope of the search authorized.

I never said this was the final word. Nothing you quoted stated any likelihood that this would be knocked down.

-A "real" judge? The Judge who issued the warrant was a real judge. A Judge did look at this. I see you are still mindlessly repeating this bogus talking point.

I think he learned his lesson last time, he will pardon himself on the way out if Vance is not elected.

They never want to argue the facts directly because they know they can't.

-You tell me what your point is. -You want to speculate with and hide behind rhetorical questions, because you can't argue the facts. There was enough evidence to investigate violations of federal election law, a judge reviewed this, signed off on a warrant, and the FBI executed that warrant. -A "real" judge? The Judge who issued the warrant was a real judge. So, do you have anything of substance to offer here, or just try to sow doubt and conspiratorial objections through rhetorical questions?

Well, perhaps this will be enough to finally put an end to this barbaric practice of butchering children. It will not be worth the risk for these frauds and disgusting "professionals" to convince a child to butcher themselves and tell parents they have to do it or their child will die. ‘Detransitioner’ Wins $2 Million Medical-Malpractice Lawsuit https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/detransitioner-wins-2-million-medical-malpractice-lawsuit/ " Just as in Chloe Cole’s medical malpractice case — which has yet to be litigated — adults feared Fox would commit suicide:

Who said anything about evidence of innocence? You are the one here pushing some conspiracy without evidence that this warrant was some kind of assault on Democracy. The FBI had a warrant to investigate violations of federal election law signed off by a Judge. Are you unaware of this? Do you need me to spoon-feed you the details of that?

Do you have any evidence that the FBI was acting improperly here or that they did not have evidence to act on here? Was the warrant fabricated or something? Was the Judge in on this big conspiracy of yours, too?

America does not have judges saying the President is above the law. Money IS in fact speech in every practical way you engage in speech. It costs money to make that poster board you hold up over your head while you scream. It costs money for you to transport yourself to the street corner. It costs money to print out those pamphlets you are handing out. It costs money to advertise on TV, radio, etc... So yes, money is in fact speech.

Projection.

Yes... did you have a point? Mine was pretty clear. You are playing a game as if the fact that no one investigated anything before somehow discounts this investigation now.

Maybe, but that is still not the IDF officially saying or doing anything.

FACE act - Federal Criminal Law - Broken Criminal Trespass - Law Broken You do not have a right to enter private property, refuse to leave, and engage in disrupting, harassing, and preventing people from doing what they want on their private property, and a church has extra protections with the FACE act.

Perhaps, but you were making broad, generalized statements about IDF dismissing "Hamas numbers" generally throughout the conflict. So you agree, Hamas did push numbers throughout the conflict that were wrong and should not have been trusted? Because you want to be honest and factual and not sink to the level of those you disagree with?

I completely agree with you, but it is still irrelevant. Lemon could have been the Tom Brokaw, Peter Jennings, or Dan Rather back in the big days of broadcast journalism on the major networks, and this still would have been illegal and wrong.

What is funny is that you are making baseless assertions without any evidence. Lemon violated the law. He is being prosecuted for violating the law. There are literally thousands of journalists covering this and saying bad things about Trump and this administration. No one is being silenced because of that. You can't deal with the facts here, so you make up crap instead.

I am not amazed anymore. @robosmith is a pathological liar who will do, say, and twist anything no matter how absurdly dishonest he has to be just to be on one side of the political spectrum.

No, I see your exaggerations just fine.

Is this even a serious question? Who was going to investigate it 5 or 6 years ago?