Jump to content

User

Senior Member
  • Posts

    15,150
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    51

Everything posted by User

  1. Me putting garland on it? YOU were the one who made no effort to provide any substance to make it sound as if the federal government were just having protestors shot. I am the one demanding facts from you here, you are not interested in them. Even now, you want to only say police shot 2 protestors. They were not "protesting" when they were shot and that is not why they were shot. Except, you are knowingly and willfully engaged in distorting the perception here, you are not merely commenting on it.
  2. Because it is. The question is, why are you willing to be this dishonest? -Destruction of government property -Obstruction -Using force to interfere -Assault Those are all federal criminal statutes he violated by being in the street and kicking a federal officers vehicle, spitting at them, and busting a tail light out.
  3. No, this video evidence dispels the BS narrative folks like you on the left were pushing that he was just there to take video peacefully on the sidewalk as if he was just a nice guy engaged in lawful peaceful protest and wasn't doing anything wrong at all!
  4. No, that is not what happened. Your statement is so comically absurdly lacking any substance or specifics, it would be just as true for me to say your country is having people shot. I mean, there are police shootings in your country, right? So Canada is having people shot! ICE had not "been killing" people in Minneapolis before the agitators showed up to obstruct them... So, why would you say that is why?
  5. And according to some of the leftists standards on here, she deserves to be mocked for making a big deal out of this.
  6. No one is having federal police shoot protestors. This statement is so absurdly broad and woefully lacking any substance.
  7. “Deserve” is irrelevant. When you do stupid things of great risk, crap happens.
  8. Listen, the standard is that if nothing bad really happened, who cares. A guy threw his sandwich at a federal officer last year and the folks on the left laughed at and mocked the officer because it was just a sandwich. So… this was what, just some vinegar? Was she hurt? Nope.
  9. These problems are of you own making. You are either too ignorant or dishonest when you say Pro-Life folks don’t care about the mother or the living child.
  10. What is dumb here is your using the same old tired anti “Pro-Life” arguments. Pro-Life is a term used to deacribe people’s position on abortion, not some absurd absolute statement that applies to every conceivable concept outside of that. Just like people who are “Pro-Choice” are not really for choice in anything and everything-like school choice. Pro-Life, at its core, essentially is a belief that the unborn child is a human life with a right to life. I don’t support the death penalty either. And if you want to talk about hypocrisy on this position, then it goes both ways. You hypocritically choose life in one scenario and reject it in the other. The difference being that you stand with the absolute worst criminal scum of society, people who are so depraved that they get the death penalty, while you don’t give a shit that millions of unborn children are killed a year for the mere convenience of it.
  11. Well, yeah, it does. His choosing to go armed to a protest where he was planning to obstruct, did obstruct, and had also previously scuffled with LEO before is almost certainly why he is dead now because he fought with LEO again with a gun they shot him because of that… right or wrong, his stupidity got him killed.
  12. Protesting isn’t the issue…. Breaking the law and obstructing is.
  13. Huh? Regardless of an argument over intentions, he did in fact obstruct and then resist. That aside, he was associated with the ICE agitators, somehow figured out exactly where to be, and had gotten into a scuffle with them the week before having his rib broken. So, we have plenty of evidence as to what his intentions were.
  14. It matters that he was armed as he went to obstruct law enforcement and fought with them as they moved to detain him. The only escalation was on his part as he chose to stand in the middle of the road.
  15. Rittenhouse wasn’t going with a plan to obstruct law enforcement and then fight with them. Huge difference. Although I do agree, the mere fact that this guy had a gun or brought one isn’t evidence of any intentions, other than his being a world class idi0t
  16. No, you are just a coward. You ran like the coward you are from me because you are a relentless trolling spambot and I called you out post after post after post with facts and you can’t stand it.
  17. If only your claim was about “peak output”
  18. This is a lie. You have no legal right to stand in the middle of the road.
  19. Just like those calling those officers murderers is insulting and BS.
  20. As opposed to how you hide like a coward?
×
×
  • Create New...