gatomontes99

You have taken "might have" and "may have", combined it with a video near the school (but not at the school) and made it a definite. We don't know what hit the school. It might have been a Tomahawk. It might have been a drone. After all, Iran uses tons of american parts for their drones.

You don't see the irony of this?

In what way?

Blue Terroris is rampant.

How can you know they did not have a problem?

I will concede that it is possible we hit the school. However, that was clearly unintentional. If we hit it, either the intelligence was wrong or the munition malfunctioned. We can't possibly know that, yet. However, there is some reasonable speculation that suggests that. We will see. The Iranians certainly are not against killing their own. Some video evidence suggests that might be an Iranian KH-55 that malfunctioned as a result of the US GPS jamming. The KH-55 has wings that are slightly farther back, as in the video at the military base with a school for girls. It also tends to attack from above, on a descent. The Tomahawk attacks from a lower plain. None of that proves it is a KH-55. The video is grainy, so the actual size of the missile in the video is not easily determined. Plus, the Tomahawk can be dropped in like this one, if it is programmed that way. The point I am making is that we have to wait for the final determinations. If we did hit the all girls school, we can be certain it was not on purpose. We will determine how things went wrong and put in safe guards to prevent that from happening again. We have been doing that since WWI and we have gotten damn good at avoiding civilian deaths. We even invented a missile that can penetrate a small car and kill only the intended target. We will find a way to avoid this in the future if we are to blame.

Mimicking Romans does not make Romans fascist you morơn.

Same tactics as the porn actress. Make assumptions, redefine terms, apply unproven characteristics and then draw conclusion.

https://detectvideo.ai/ says it is pretty likely based on just the thumbnail.

The infrastructure we are destroying is their military complex.

Based on what evidence?

All outlets use old footage when they don't have the new footage yet. Maybe they had an issue with the truck that communicates with the home office. Who knows. The fact that they used the actual footage once they had it and before beaver could get his panties in a wad, tells us they had no issue with the real footage.

He is serving now dipshit.

36 states have voter ID laws. Sooooo....14 states would need the laws....annnnnnd the states (36) already have subsidies for those that need them.....are you getting there yet? I did not day it proves citizenship. I said it is one of the approved IDs for the SAVE Act. I also said a few states list the citizenship on the ID of the owner can prove citizenship. So, those do prove citizenship even if that is not accepted...yet. Bullshit! Congress: Specifically, the bill prohibits states from accepting and processing an application to register to vote in a federal election unless the applicant presents documentary proof of U.S. citizenship. The bill specifies what documents are considered acceptable proof of U.S. citizenship, such as identification that complies with the REAL ID Act of 2005 that indicates U.S. citizenship. Lmao...ok. So you don't want to admit you didn't notice that you used registrations and I used votes. Whatever.

Just one. They hate America. Trump loves America. So they must hate Trump.

It is literally inly 14 states. The states I listed do list citizenship and the SAVE Act lists those Rela IDs as acceptable. What exactly are you arguing? Enhanced IDs are different than a Real ID with Citizenship status. Registered is not voted. The study goes on to say that just over 6% voted. I quoted the voted part. Try to pay attention. 1 million illegal voters is not a fictional problem.

The SCOTUS ruled that requiring an ID can amount to a poll tax. So every state with an ID requirement has implemented some sort of subsidy for the poor. Problem solved. In the following states, the Real ID indicates citizenship: Alaska, Michigan, Maine, New Hampshire, Nevada, New York, Washington. I quoted just facts because the study is behind a pay wall. Edit: Snopes is not a reputable source. That has clearly been shown. They are part of the IFCN cabal that is owned and operated by an extremist left wing pundit. There is nothing about SNOPES that is fair, balanced or factual. However, the study I quoted said 6%. You quoted some study that claimed 10-20%. Do you think that, maybe, a Trump friendly state might have voter ID laws? And that those states probably don't issue IDs to illegal aliens? It would stand to reason that those states do have lower illegal alien voters AND that is a result of the very same laws that the SAVE Act is making national. So you proved my point.

Sarcasm isn't a lie. A lie has the intent to deceive. He had no intentent to deceive.

Dude! That straw man fell right down. What a Mike Tyson v Marvis Frazier moment! It is almost like that straw man threw the fight!

Every Word!

Americans Can Apply for Real ID Without Any Cost—Here’s What You Need to Do! Some states do, mine does. I didn't know other states did not. I showed a peer reviewed study that was published in a scientific journal. You showed me a news report. Forgive me if I don't change my view.

They just don't want to show their support for her. Deep down, they know they are as horrible as she is.

How can you possibly know that? Seriously. We deidentify ballots for voter security so liberals can't use our ballot as a reason to attack us through the legal system as one example. You should be aware that you are parroting "facts' that are not facts: Just facts - In 2014, the academic journal Electoral Studies published a groundbreaking study by three scholars who estimated how frequently non-citizens were illegally voting. Based on data for the 2008 presidential and congressional elections, the study found that: “roughly one quarter of non-citizens” in the U.S. “were likely registered to vote.” “6.4% of non-citizens actually voted.” 81.8% of them “reported voting for Barack Obama.” illegal votes cast by non-citizens “likely” changed “important election outcomes” in favor of Democrats, “including Electoral College votes” and a “pivotal” U.S. Senate race that enabled Democrats to pass Obamacare. The study’s voter registration rate was estimated with data from two key sources: A national survey in which 14.8% of non-citizens admitted that they were registered to vote. A database of registered voters that reveals what portion of the surveyed non-citizens “were in fact registered” even though “they claimed not to be registered.” *********** At 18.6 million illegal aliens, 6% is 1 million illegal votes. So, is it a nonproblem?

Yes. More hoops to jump through. But still less than to go to the doctor. Also, yes, we are trying to suppress votes. We are trying to suppress ILLEGAL votes. Is that so horrible?

Every...single...state: As of 2026, all U.S. states are compliant with the REAL ID Act... The digital ID is not valid in most states. The Real ID is 100% implemented. States IDs are free and all states are issuing Real ID compliant IDs.