gatomontes99

Apparently she even copied and pasted a part that said reelect Joe Biden.

They were not excessive.

Why are you being so overly dramatic about this? I've seen the body cam. Neither side looked pure. But this isn't nearly as aggressive or bad as you make it out to be.

Bullspit. You've never been pulled over and refused to roll down your tinted window. If you had, they would have said something.

There is no such thing as an untargetted tariff. All tariffs (at a minimum) target imported goods. No one is proposing that broad of a tariff. At most, the tariffs are targetted at a country or a set of countries.

I think Tyreek would have been just fine of he hadn't been kind of a pr1ck. Next time, leave the window down, give them the license and insurance and if you get a ticket, pay it or argue with the judge. Areguing with the cop and not following lawful commands will get you cuffed. Think of it from the cop's perspective. They have no idea what is going on behind that tinted glass. He could have pulled a gun. It was for everyone's safety that he keep the window down. And the b.s. lie about just having knee surgery so he can't sit. Give me a break. He can't sit but he can run 22 mph and score a touchdown? Now. C'mon man. For his part, the cop did let Tyreek get to him. He probably could have been a little less of a dick. But Tyreek did it to himself.

I laid out the good and the bad. You only focus on the bad. Why?

All taxes are paid by the end user. I'm glad the left is finally acknowledging that. What sets tariffs apart from taxes is that they are unequal between competing parties. If you have a US car manufacturer and...let's say...a Chinese car manufacturer and we place a tariff on the Chinese manufacturer, the Chinese manufacturer has an additional cost to the final consumer. Now, we also need to talk about price elasticity when we talk about any tax (a tariff is a tax). The consumer will only pay a set amount for a given product. When the price is below that amount, the consumer readily buys the product. When the price is above that amount, the consumer is more hesitant. With that in mind, if a tariff drives the cost to the manufacturer to an amount that is higher than the consumers' tolerance, the manufacturer will have to use less expensive materials, labor or shipping to be competitive. If the cost is increased to what other manufactuers' costs are, then they are now on at equal cost and price to consumer. Since tariffs target foreign manufacturers, the domestic benefits are to domestic manufacturers, their employees and suppliers. So, if we put a 100% tariff on Chinese made electric cars than domesticly produced electric cars would benefit. The reason we have to do that is that China takes money from their citizens to give to the manufacturer so that they have a competitive advantage. Further, China suppress wages and plays games with the value of the Yen to create even larger advantages. This is why both Canada and the US put tariffs on Chinese made electric cars. Both countries did it with very liberal leaders taking up the cause. Blaming Trump or faulting Trump for championing that idea in 2016 and today is as hypocritical as it gets.

But we know what he will do because he did it the first time. Harris is lying about her positions on just about everything and mimicking Trump when she feels like he has the best answer. But the better question is when will you stop beating your kids?

Of course they mention mass deportation...YALL FU$%!NG LET IN EVERY CRIMINAL SOUTH OF THE BORDER!!!!! They both mention it because it is absolutely necessary to the safety of the American people. Did you miss the 75% OF ARRESTS IN NYC ARE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS???!!! One policy does not mean they are symbiotic. It means they are on the same page as that one policy. Meanwhile, Harris wants to drop oil prices by undoing the policies that her and Joe put into place. I don't believe her. I don't believe her for one second. She's going to keep doing things to drive up costs. She going to keep letting criminals, fentanyl and trafficked children to cross the border. She's going to continue using NGOs to censor ideas. She's going to continue to support Hamas, Iran and Russia. She's a train wreck.

Thank you. I so rarely use a laptop or desktop.

I see a lot of Xs there. This must be left wing fapping material. ____________________ https://www.forbes.com/sites/caileygleeson/2024/07/05/trump-disavows-project-2025-calls-some-of-conservative-groups-ideas-absolutely-ridiculous-and-abysmal/ Trump said in a Truth Social post he has “no idea who is behind” Project 2025, adding he disagrees with some of the project’s proposals for the next GOP administration and “some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal.” Trump went on to say: “Anything they do, I wish them luck, but I have nothing to do with them.” ____________________

One thing we know for sure, libs now love them some Dick. I mean, they really love Dick. Like, Dick is all they can talk about. Getting Dick just made their day. Dick has redefined the D party.

Project 2025 is the Heritage Foundation. Those policies are their policies, and no one else. Trump has repeatedly denied that they are his policies. Meanwhile, Harris has called for price controls, open borders, defund police, bailing out blm, allowing blm to riot, etc. She's got bad policies and she's freaking stupid. She actually said Democracy was a danger to America. She said that. Look it up. Oh, it wasn't just a danger, it was the number one threat to America. And she's running around talking like she's some house slave from the 1800s and cooking food in a bath tub. She's a disaster.

He was also calling the use of EOs being a dictator, but that part wasn't important enough to matter either.

Maybe you should get a lesson on how to read for comprehension.

That logic is based on the racist belief that one is the lowest common denominator. She's not black. She's not Indian. She's mixed. ANY assertion to the contrary is racist.

He's never said he would be dictator. Why donyounkeep repeating that lie?

Innocent people say they didn't do it. Guilty people say you can't prove it.

Nice word salad

If there was no cheating, the democrats wouldn't be mad about stopping cheating.

What more proof do you need that there is a uniparty/blob/deep state...whatever you want to call it...that is pulling all the strings. This is why a Trump/Kenedy/Gabbard coalition is so troubling.

Wow. She really is bad at talking off prompter. Good thing she doesn't wear lace up shoes or her staff would have to help her tie her shoes.

Is it better to be like Republicans and ignore the person and embrace the policies or to be like Democrats and ignore the policies and the person to embrace the image?