gatomontes99

You lied: Those were in 2017 and were a result of Hillary Clinton and her surrogates claiming Trump was an illegitimate president that was aided by Russia. All lies. Tell me how you aren't lying again. Please. And now you are trying to incite the third attempt on Trump's life.

Lmao...ok...so you are telling me that his proclamation triggered this guy into getting the whereabouts of the former president, who was on an off the books movement, finding an AK 47, and setting up a sniper's nest after traveling from Hawaii in just a couple of hours? Or, is it more likely that the guy that was hyper focused on Ukraine heard Harris say that Trump would abandon Ukraine and then used that as motivation to develop intelligence on where the President would be, scope out a good spot to set up and put the plan into motion? ***I had to censor the quote because the words this guy used toward Trump were too strong for this forum.*** https://www.nbcnews.com/now/video/harris-says-putin-would-have-conquered-ukraine-if-trump-were-still-president-219044421598 Harris's lies at the debate likely motivated this guy to Kill Trump.

Weird how my 92% is supported by a link and your 54% is just some b.s. you pulled out of your racist butt hole. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literacy_in_the_United_States

I know facts just get in the way of good ol' fashion liberal racism, but let's do it anyway: Keep in mind that 92% of American adults are literate. So, yes, it is legitimate to say that the demographics of Haiti lend themselves to lower IQs.

Do you want to revise your clear lie?

Uh huh. So, when someone says protest peacefully and patriotically, that really means attack, kill and destroy? But when Harris says they should keep fighting regarding blm riots that burned down portions of cities, that's just good ol' fashion first amendment rights, right?

Wild suddenly means revolution? That's a pathetic equivocation, even for you. As for shooting or not, so what? Just because the USSS actually did their job doesn't mean there wasn't an attempt or that your side didn't incite it. Those two, and more, predicted that the Dem rhetoric was going to cause an assasination attempt.

Do we need to run the video of Democrats doing the same thing in 2016? No he didn't. But that isn't what was debunked. What was debunked was this idea that conservatives were calling in bomb threats. I conclusively showed it is a nationwide trend.

Peacefully and patrioticly protest just never plays into the equation for you, does it? Has any politician ever said the other side is cheating? Yes. Has any politician ever said fight? Yes. If those words were so magical that they would automatically cause a riot, why didn't they before? Because the words were not the problem. The words didn't cause anything.

At least you are starting to get there. But Trump didn't incite violence. Unless you are willing to admit Obama incited violence in Ferguson, Maxine is responsible for the assault on Cruz, or Harris is responsible for the violence that happened after she said it should continue. Rhetoric is rhetoric. Auntie Maxine and Harris literally told people to be violent. Obama and Trump fanned the flames by being political. Saying Trump caused J6 is ridiculous. As for this latest shooting, these were predicted. And (start at 8 min) https://rumble.com/v3dl2pa-speeding-towards-assassination-ep.-2079-08312023.html The left has been speeding towards assasination and they appear to have inspired two attempts on Trump. They paired down Trump's detail. They assigned rookies and non USSS agents to his detail despite the Iranian threat. They are scared sh1tless of this guy. They want him dead. And that is all the reason I need to vote for him.

Debunked already.

Really? What part was a lie what she said now or what she said then?

You posted an article that relies heavily on a liberal author that hates Trump. https://www.forbes.com/sites/sorensonimpact/2023/05/22/exploring-opportunity-zones-exciting-new-data-on-the-positive-impact-of-ozs-across-the-nation/ Over 50% of the OZs had investments in a very short time. It was working despite the racist libs objections.

Kind of racist of you to say that.

Oh My Gawd He so did!

Aren't you the one that was making blatantly racist comments in the other thread? Of course you are. Stop projecting and start growing.

That's not a springfield problem. DFW: https://www.wfaa.com/article/news/education/north-texas-police-address-threats-made-against-school-districts-this-week/287-66ad0d0f-27a3-42a5-b435-6a635cd2a546 LA: https://www.foxla.com/news/bomb-threat-flintridge-preparatory-school-investigation NYC: https://longisland.news12.com/extra-police-presence-at-bronxville-schools-after-bomb-threat Chicago: https://www.fox32chicago.com/news/fenton-high-school-threats-evacuation Denver: https://kdvr.com/news/local/police-investigating-alleged-threat-at-englewood-schools/ Nationally: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/northern-california-schools-respond-to-social-media-threats/vi-AA1qy6k5 The point is, there are threats in every major school district in the country. They probably get threats in small school districts as well. To say that there are threats now, so that must mean it is Trump's fault, is so asinine that it could only be a dim-mock-rat claim.

But the left is literally trying to kill people. Remember Portland? Kenosha? Atlanta? LA? Trump? Palestinian riots this summer? You guys are violent.

Maybe because the left keeps trying to kill them.

Called it

Fify Remember, they don't want equality. Equality will result in varying outcomes. They want equity. Aka, the same outcome, aka socialism, aka slavery.

Did Putin endorse Harris or Trump?

Kind of racist of you to assume they are stupid because they are black.

What if we had a debate with two moderators. One moderator picked by each side. Each mod would take turns asking each candidate a question. That way both sides get a mix of softball and hardball questions so they can get their message out and take shots at the other's message.