gatomontes99

30 years? Try 1000 years. @robosmith, answer two questions if you will: What temperature has the Earth spent most of its existent at? What is the current temp?

Probably too soon for jokes.

The Tesla guy was a bomb expert. He managed to pull up, shoot himself and detonate a bomb in 17 seconds. And he decided to have his military ID and Passport with him. It's all very strange.

Ok Skippy. You keep believing that. But let's recap: I made fun of your hypocrisy You tried to call me homophobic, I debunked your article You called me names. I called you out on it. You tried to use the same debunked article. I pointed out your article was already debunked. You tried a new article I debunked that. What do you think will happen next? You can't support your opinion. And your opinion is based on a false assumption that I am homophobic. I am not. I made fun of you for being a hypocrite. And none of this has to do with a general giving an enemy aid and comfort...aka treason.

No. The article that came from was cited in this article and that article cited the study you cited. It's all one big circle jerk. The irony here is that you are the one that is insecure in who you are, not me.

From you source: "First, homophobia was associated with increased odds of straight identification in all groups." You should read your sources.

Well, A: I get to be pissed because my team lost. B: You should be pissed because Joe Joe the dumbass is trying to cause inflation during Trump's term with last second, scorched earth political b.s.

You are really grasping at straws. I didn't clumsily deny anything. I quoted YOUR SOURCE. That source is over 30 years old. There is no study that claims to prove homophobia is associated with latent homesexual desire. Not your study and no study since. Let's face it. You got pwned and you tried to respond but you just dug a deeper and deeper whole. My comment was about YOU being a HYPOCRITE. Because you were. Maybe don't throw shade when you are standing in the darkness.

It was THE AUTHORS OF THE STUDY THAT YOU QUOTED SAYING THE STUDY WAS IN INCLUSIVE. So your retort to you have no substance and can't respond with anything other than personal attacks, is to respond with no substance and make more personal attacks? Prove me right much?

I posted an article that completely refuted your homophobic study (including quotes from your study that refuted your study) and all you did was cut the stuff that refuted your baseless assertion and make personal attacks on me. Now you try to say I lack emotional maturity, while you behave like an child.

Isn't it wonderful that Joe is doing everything he can to make our lives harder?

No. I'm saying you are a hypocrit relying on cheap, childish retorts rather than substantive discussion.

Nope. Joe was never really President.

Kind of like the guy that pretends to be a girl making fun of the guy that dresses up and pretends to be someone else for fun? You literally did that same thing twice.

Did you see how you precious paper admits it is flawed?

But that's my real name. 😮‍💨

A terrorist ran over 15(?) people in New Orleans and planted IEDs near the scene ahead of time, and terrorist rented a CyberTruck and detonated a bomb outside the Trump tower and the FBI caught a guy planning to shoot up the AIPA office in Florida. So how will the press make this Trump's fault?

First, it's not homophonic because I was making fun of your hypocrisy. Second, you haven't read that study, have you? The authors of that study cite anxiety, among other possible factors, leading to increased erections. Combine that with the incredibly small and skewed sample size and highly questionable methodology, this study is only ever cited positively in a political context and is almost always cited negatively in a scientific context. Examining Arousal and Homophobia https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/pop-psych/201507/examining-arousal-and-homophobia?eml

Lmao...did the trans guy just try to make fun of someone for dressing up and pretending to be someone they aren't?

I just pasted some of the funnier ones. Good times. HAPPY NEW YEAR!

Oh dude. Did you not see the Kamala paying "influencers" to promote her? Don't think that is a one sided thing.

Ken Paxton is one of those politicians that I agree with about 75% of the time. I am with him on his impeachment sham (because he proved himself innocent) and one the stuff he does with illegal aliens. I'm not so much in agreement with his view of "health of the mother" when it comes to abortion or with this guy that was convicted of murder using the bad science of shaken baby syndrome. On this issue, however, he is spot on. Texans voted conservative, so we should get conservative. Period.

That's the rub. What then? Then there are legal battles....LEGAL BATTLES... over what votes count and don't count. Just like Gore/Bush or Kennedy/Nixon. It was not unprecedented to challenge election results. It wasn't unprecedented to have alternate electors. It isnt normal. But it isnt illegal to make LEGAL CHALLENGES. Some might think it is low or scummy or immoral or antidemocratic or whatever. But it isn't illegal. What it is is a focal point of anger, for those with TDS, to justify their irrational hatred of everyone and everything associated with DJT.

HE was talking about HIMself.

Most Trusted Name In News Ex-top Biden DOJ official now prosecuting Trump was once paid by DNC for 'political consulting' Oooppps.