gatomontes99

Trump was never convicted of rape. Where do you come up with this shit?

Sounds like the US cleared the mines and now are letting through everyone that did not bribe Iran. I get it. I also get why they bribed Iran.

What was actually said: “I moved on her… I did try and f--- her,” “I just kiss. I don’t even wait,” “when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the ****” He was commenting on how easy they are around him. He said he could do it. He did not say he was doing it. He might have been. He did not say he was, though. As for Swalwell, CNN published interviews with corroborated evidence. This is not some flimsy allegation. Four stories, all with coroborating evidence.

Leaving this right here: The three women that are not named sat down with CNN and so did their families. The one woman that is named also allowed family and friends to be interviewed. They ALL have evidence. Two of them have very similar rape stories. It really appears that it might be ruffies or something similar. This might get very ugly for him.

Dude...hypocrite much?

That didn't happen. Where are you getting that info? Here: https://maplecrestlaw.com/us-asylum-policy-changes-2025-what-you-need-to-know/ Asylum and refugee claims are still viable. They just can't be abused like it was under Biden. Restricted how? To people that aren't bringing the next pandemic or convicted of murder? That is so far out of left field it definitely came from the stands in foul territory. How in the world did you come to that conclusion...any of these conclusions? Nothing you have said has any basis in reality.

There is nothing in the Constitution that guarantees a right to asylum. That is not what that EO said. The EO said the military had to help secure the border, that the CBP could use drones and build a wall but it said nothing about preventing asylum seekers. You made that up. Can you prove that your assertion is in the EO? I will even make it easy for you: A link to the EO in question. You don't even have to figure out how to use Google. Just click the link and copy and paste the part that says no migration or asylum. The bill was crap: the Hill "But the conservatives are right about this bill. The Border Act would not stop the administration from continuing to create questionable parole programs to admit migrants who don’t have visas or other valid entry documents. It would not end catch and release. It would not stop migrants from using meritless asylum claims to enter and remain in the United States indefinitely. As U.S. District Court Judge T. Kent Wetherell said in a 2023 immigration case, the Biden-Harris administration’s actions have been “akin to posting a flashing ‘Come In, We’re Open’ sign on the southern border.” The Border Act does provide the president with authority to close the border down when illegal crossings between ports of entry reach an average of 4,000 per day for more than seven days. This is not mandatory, however, unless the average rises above 5,000 per day for more than seven days, which would be more than 1.8 million per year. And even that provision would sunset in three years. That is not a resolution of the issue." Trump said the bill was not needed to close the border to illegal aliens. The bill did not pass. Illegal aliens are not getting through. Trump was correct.

No. Seeking asylum is a defense to their lack of proper visa and is supposed to be reserved for the politically prosecuted and refugees. It is a privilege that is afforded those that don't have the freedom to disagree with their government and need a "safe house." It is not, as the Biden admin used it, a bypass to the immigration law and it does not apply to economically disadvantaged or people from regions with high crime rates.

Yep. And if they are here illegally then it is analogous. The race is not important. The legal status is.

VEGANS OUT FOR VENGEANCE!

Its not fraud. There was nothing illegal about it! You don't present evidence. You present opinions that use factoids to dupe the gullible. Zero evidence is given. What you post is like me saying ABC bank got robbed today. Robosmith was at that bank and has some cash with him. The brain wants to fill in the blanks and make a story that can be filed away. So the reader decides they know what happened. Your Russia Collusion stories are the exact same. They say things like Trump had a bank account there and Flynn sold them internal polling data and some Russian fraudster tried to get Trump to give them money and the Russians bought ads on Facebook. All factoids. None related. The kicker is, the story was made up, using those factoids, by Obama. We have proof of that. Not evidence. Proof. But that proof will be dismissed by you. The truth does not fit the fantasy world that you live in, so you choose not to believe it. Instead, you believe the lies you are told, because that is what you want to believe.

If my argument was so bad, why couldn't you come up with anything of substance to refute it?

Tom Homan was first appointed to lead border enforcement by Barack Obama. He says "Look, I started in the Board Patrol in 1984. I've been at this for over 40 years. I've worked for six presidents, starting with Ronald Reagan. Every president I ever worked for took border security seriously because you can't have national security if you don't have strong border security. We got to know who's coming in, what's coming in, where it's coming in, why it's coming in, right? Even President Obama and President Clinton took some steps to secure the border because they understood national security was important. Joe Biden was the first president in the history of this nation who came into office and unsecured a border on purpose. That's just a fact.” So, gas light all you want. The fact is the Biden admin did open the border to just about everyone. That is why we had a surge at the border. That is why he had a high incidence of turn backs. But he also had a policy that devastated millions of people trying to get here. We have no clue how many died on the way. We have a vague understanding of all thoughts that were raped. We can't even grasp how many became slave here in America. Stop with the incessant gas lighting. You are lying. Everyone on this forum knows you are lying. Just stop already. Patently false: 8 U.S. Code § 1158 - Asylum "(2) Exceptions (A) Safe third country Paragraph (1) shall not apply to an alien if the Attorney General determines that the alien may be removed, pursuant to a bilateral or multilateral agreement, to a country..." They don't even have to send them home. They can literally ship them to any where in the world. Hypothetically, if we could vet them all, I have no problem with it from just an immigration standpoint. That said, this would be like filling a bathtub with a fire hose. So many problems. Tweaking the rates is fine though. Prove it. Debunked above. But keep repeating that lie. No, they are fleeing poverty or the law. The rest comes with violating the law. And now that we enforce the law, these things are not happening. Perhaps you are just making shit up. I said help them make their economies better. I didn't say send them money. Are you so unimaginative that you think the only way to fix a problem is to send money?

Is that why democrats are underwater...with their own others...in their own polls? You are delusional. This is what blind hatred looks like folks.

And how long have you been living in this fantasy world?

So true. But Rubio has returned a hero 20 times and that was just last month. /hyperbole. You could probably make a case for better VPs than Vance in our history. You'd be very hard pressed to find a better Sec of State than Rubio.

Rubio is a no doubter. Still loooove JD. But Rubio might out do Trump as POTUS.

The left: Melania was helping Epstein! Melania: "No I wasn't." The left: "See! Her denial proves everything!" These people are just distracting us from all the great things that have happened under 47. So let's have a look: Iran will never have a nuke. Venezuela is now our oil partner. China lost two oil partners. Russia lost two oil partners. Tax cuts are permanent. No tax on tips. Border closed. 3 million + deportations. Border wall being built. Renegotiate trade deals. Inflation under control Jobs shifted from government to private sector. Serious investigations into fraud. Mexico finally going after cartels. Trillions in new investments in the US. Terminated Biden-era electric vehicle mandates and policies. Implemented policies to combat fentanyl trafficking and illegal immigration enforcement. Facilitated the release of American hostages held abroad. Expanded American energy production and repealed restrictive environmental regulations. Established the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and promoted U.S. leadership in digital assets. Signed executive orders protecting children from chemical and surgical mutilation and ending unfair sports practices. Reformed federal bureaucracy to increase efficiency and reduce waste. 125 year lows in crimes, including murders. Advanced education reform and parental rights in schooling. Expanded clemency with pardons and commutations addressing perceived injustices. College sports reforms. Serious investigations into voter fraud. There are probably more. But what does the left have as accomplishments? Shot at border agents in Texas. Shot at other border agents in Texas, killing two illegal immigrants. Came up with TACO. Rioted in LA. Rioted in Minneapolis. Killed Charlie Kirk. Pushed debunked Epstein conspiracy theories. Record low approval ratings including net disapproval in own party. Shut down the government, twice, harming the people that are supposed to be protecting us from danger. Look, keep doing what you are doing. I love it. The left has become completely irrelevant in today's political climate. Don't stop now.

The wealth tax is the latest way democrats are proposing to bilk Americans of their money and fund the massive fraud that is our government's budget. A wealth tax will severely harm our economy. A wealth tax is: Let's take Calofornia's "one-time" wealth tax on billionaires as an example of how this would destroy economies. They want voters to vote on a 5% wealth tax (CNBC). The 5% would be the sum of all assets a billionaire owns. That would mean real estate, investments, cash, businesses etc would all have to be assessed for value and then totaled to determine the taxable amount. Once that taxable amount is determined, the billionaire has to pay the 5% with cash. At a minimum, that would be $50 million. Most rich people don't have all their assets in cash. They have property, investments, businesses, etc. The cash they do have is considered operating capital. Cash they use for day to day life. Fifty million is not just play money. They don't have this sitting in a bank account just waiting to be spent. How would they get the cash then? The cash would likely come from assets that are easy to sell. The easiest assets to sell are stocks, bonds and other investments. This will be where the economy gets harmed the most. If every billionaire had to sell their assets at the same time, they would flood the market. Econ 101 tells us that when a market is flooded with supply, the price goes down. The biggest issue with lower stock prices is the loss of leverage. Lower stock prices make it harder for businesses to raise capital. If they can't raise capital, or they have to pay more to get the capital, growth becomes harder. If a business can't grow the economy can't grow. Do not expect this "one-time" tax to be a one-time or just for billionaires. Eventually, it will be millionaires too. Imagine you have a $500,000 home, a car worth $30,000, a 401k worth $400,000 and $70,000 in cash. Congrats, you are a millionaire. Now you have to raise $50,000 in cash to pay your taxes. The first year is doable. But what about next year? The year after that? There are examples of how a wealth tax has harmed local governments. Maryland tried it in 2007. Instead of raising tax revenues, revenues fell drastically. This is what is in California's future. This is also what is in the future for America if we install such a suppressive tax. If America employs a wealth tax, you will see a rise in LLCs that are listed as investment companies. These investment companies would all magically hold just under the wealth tax number and/or they will be off shore investment accounts, leaving America void of capital. The stock market would falter. Business growth would be stymied. Slowed business growth would slow job growth. Another issue would be the offshore of businesses. A wealth tax would force businesses to flee the US or be forced to pass on taxes. To find a cost advantage, they would move to more tax friendly regions. Overall, the effects on the economy would be devastating. poverty would rise, jobless claims would rise, the stock market would fall and businesses would flee.

There is no spell check flag on a phone dumbasș. Oh, I saw them. My statement holds true.

You think the alias Trump used in a couple of interviews and to buy real estate equals proof that Trump and Hegseth threatened to kill the Pope? Who am I supposed to believe here? Your unproven assertions? You still believe in Russian collusion.

I am lying? I literally posted video evidence from YouTube dating back to 2024. What did I do, fake that? Did I fake the post from WesternLensMan? Or, maybe...just maybe...you just refuse to believe anything you don't want to believe, even when overwhelming evidence is presented. That seems to track more.

And @Hodad thinks it would be funny to nuke Jerusalem.

And.....Mamdani admitted, in this video, that Democrats suppressed blacks. Who has run NY since Giuliani? If it is systematic and the system is run by democrats....can you get there? ITS DEMOCRATS THAT ARE THE RACISTS!

You only believe what you want to believe.