gatomontes99

Where is this evidence? Keep in mind, multiple witnesses say it never happened.

Well, you would know what I am saying better than me. 😒 Jesus teaches in John 8:1-11 that we cannot condemn those that sin and neither does he. The sin os the enemy, not the sinner. The act is the problem, not the person. Celebrating people for their sins is just as wrong. We should do our best to live a life without sin (not possible, but try any way) therefore we should not celebrate and be proud of our sins. End of story. Now it's business goal? It was for disrupting the team..then it was for discrimination and hatred. Now it is business goals? Whatever.

Where do you get these lies? Try going to the source: SCOTUS BLOG FFS

No one said that. That is just the strawman you want to argue against. The sin is not the sinner. Autocorrect Actually, he is protected: Applicants, employees and former employees are protected from employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, or transgender status), national origin, age (40 or older), disability and genetic information (including family medical history). Applicants, employees and former employees are also protected from retaliation (punishment) for filing a charge or complaint of discrimination, participating in a discrimination investigation or lawsuit, or opposing discrimination (for example, threatening to file a charge or complaint of discrimination). Employees have a right to: Not be harassed or discriminated against (treated less favorably) because of race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, or transgender status), national origin, disability, age (40 or older) or genetic information (including family medical history).

Yes. We are saying no one should be proud of their sin. That is the point. That is his point. That is why what the Bulls are doing is so abhorrent. They fired him for a very basic tenant of Christianity.

The left is complaining about pulling down the dilapidated house and building a new one. The old system did not work. That is the point.

Am I? Or...are you just trying to invalidate my opinion because you recognize you are losing this argument? That is not what he said. He said the act was a sin. Not the existence. Kaepernick was not renewed because he was not very good. He won a Super Bowl, but the only reason he was in it was because his back up got him there. He only averaged 4.5 completions per quarter in his best season.

This completely invalidates your position. Do you want to think about that for a while?

Oh good gawd. You can do better. Skin color is not analogous to actions. Do better. By deleting all of his social media and only posting on one? That is the most that he can? He was talking to his followers about how his faith is troubled by his employers actions. That is federally protected speech. Show me one person that said they should be fired? Fans don't have to like Ivey for his views. But the NBA never fired any player for liberal views. Hell, an office employee celebrated Kirk's death and only got suspended after backlash. Who did he disrespect? We are all sinners. Saying we shouldn't celebrate sin does not call out anyone.

I really quit watching when Jordan retired. He was a must watch. There has not been another Jordan, yet.

Another hate-filed video fueled by blind bigotry. The idìot that made this video seems to believe that the only view that can be held, by viewing the two videos he mentioned, is his view. He lacks the ability to see how others come to varying conclusions using the same information. And, he does not care to have any such ability. This video is a typical, leftist agitprop video. It lacks perspective, relying on strawman assumptions to bolster his views. He claims that the Pretti video shows clear malice, when it actually shows a man resisting arrest, with a gun. The ending was predictable, though not perfect or desirable. He believes the J6 videos show something other than a riot, but I suspect he never watched the videos of the groups being let in and led around the Capitol building. There is always more than one side to every story. To him, there is only one side. Since he cannot comprehend that others might disagree, he must malign and berate them so that he can feel satisfaction in dismissing their opinions without consideration or discussion.

Not if they espoused religious beliefs that the employer uses as the basis of dismissal. You can't fire Abdullah for saying "Allah is great". That is religious discrimination. Ivey just said he did not agree with promoting sin. Ok. So what? He did not say anything homophobic, that was a lie by the article. He just didn't want the sin promoted. Plus, he was not fired for disparaging the league. He was fired for harming team unity, which did not appear to happen. Colbert lost his job because his ratings are trash, his ad revenue is nil and his costs are insanely high. Not for whatever fantasy you have about his dismissal.

Outsports.com "Jaden Ivey has been making a lot of noise on social media as of late for all the wrong reasons. As the Chicago Bulls guard has been struggling to recover from a knee injury suffered before the 2025-2026 NBA season, Ivey has been taking to Instagram to go on religious rants. Fans have noticed his long-winded rambling often leads to him saying some questionable things about the world around him, and this culminated in a homophobic tangent in which the fourth-year guard criticized the NBA for recognizing LGBTQ Pride Month. " The truth is always less radical than the left make it out to be. Here is what he actually said: His point is that it is not righteous. AKA it is against his deeply held religious beliefs. For that, he lost his job. He said nothing derogatory about anyone. He never threatened anyone. All he did was disagree with "holding up" sin. The NBA needs to be fined fined by the US government for their bigotry.

Let's play a game. Find the minority! The Atlantic USAToday AZ Central

Don't pamper to that dipshit. His idea of research is scrolling boomerbook and watching AI reels.

Protocol I allows for military response to civilian attacks. Further, only infrastructure that is necessary for survival is protected. Power and oil are not protected. Maybe desalination plants. However, it could be argued that fresh water supply may be sufficient. Further, your hero only said that his comments "potentially" indicate a possible violation if actually used. The entire premise of the question is based on the journalist's assumptions and not on actual battle plans, targets or actions.

So, what say you? Should this guy have been shot? He had a criminal history. He had new charges for assault. He was trying to flee and put the cop in a perilous situation. Should he be shot? Yes. Hell yes. You see, this is not about race, it is not about immigration status...it is about his actions. It is always about the actions.

Nothing else? Are you fn serious? Deportations Lowest crime in history Lowest murder rate in history New trade deals (and finalizing them) I guess you might be right though. Trump solved all those problems, so what should he run on? Oh yeah, stopping fraud, balancing the budget, and protecting elections.

Iran is hitting civilian targets every day because they do not have the capability to hit our military. If, hitting targets like power plants and oil refineries stops their power generation and money flow, thus crippling their ability to attack civilians, that is not a war crime.

Some organic protest: So these people, in large part, are paid protestors. Not all. Some are gullible enough to go for free. But a lot of this money is coming from China. Crazy, huh? Yeah. China is playing the liberal nut jobs for suckers and they don't care because Orange Man Bad! Moróns

Seriously, wtf is wrong with our government that we do less than nothing to stop people from stealing tax payer money? I will tell you why. Departments that don't spend their alloted funds lose funding. If fraud gets them over the line, then they need more funding and their jobs are safe. We need a full time government accountability office...er...wait. Ok, we need a 3rd party auditor that gets paid to find fraud. Give them 5% of every dollar saved and we cut the waste by up to 95%. Win/win

Here is why we need the SAVE Act: During the Biden Admin we allowed millions of illegal aliens to enter the country. Rather than giving them a court date for their asylum claims, we just released them into the country. After six months, they became eligible for work status and social security numbers: “Asylum seekers whose application has been pending for more than six months who apply for and are granted work authorization can get SSNs,” Gelatt also said. “People who cross the border illegally who have not applied for asylum usually cannot get work authorization or an SSN.” Not every state is the same, but most states are similar. In Illinois, for example, a SSN and living history is all that is needed to get a driver's license: Illinois Now they can work and they can drive so they can vote. All they have to do is check "US Citizen" on the voter registration they are required to be given when the get their DL and they are registered to vote and have an ID to vote with. Even in states like Texas and Florida, they can't be caught unless someone goes through and verifies citizenship: Justice.gov

Prove you M-SNOWjob lies. You are a LIAR and your OPINION means nothing!

Krugman is wrong on everything. Case...in...point: Meanwhile, inflation has dropped to 2.4%. Krugman was verifialbly wrong. His opinion is wrong. He should not be considered an expert.