gatomontes99

Trying to derail another thread, are you?

Trying to derail another thread, eh? What year did Trump supposedly cheat banks?

Kash Patel via Just The News It appears that the FBI ran a campaign to prevent field agents from investigating a pay to play scheme that ran through the Clinton Foundation. Director Patel released a timeline that shows his own agency did impede investigations that were driven by evidence.

Talk about derailing a thread, but ok. First, Stephen Miller is one of three on their leadership page. Even if you are arrogant enough to beleive he was wrong that one time, doesn't mean he's wrong every time. If you think he was lying, then how did he fake the documents that came from a FOIA request and were used in a court case to dismiss charges? Finally, democrats have continuously lied about Trump and have been proven liars, so why should I beleive your article? We now know that China was sending forged IDs, using real names and real ID numbers to Chinese nationals here in the US with the expressed purpose of voting for Joe Biden. We also know that millions of illegal aliens did register and vote. So how, exactly, is Stephen Miller wrong? https://nypost.com/2024/06/14/us-news/how-non-citizens-are-getting-voter-registration-forms-across-the-us-and-how-republicans-are-trying-to-stop-it/ Welfare offices and other agencies in at least 46 US states are providing voter registration forms to migrants without requiring proof of citizenship, leading Republicans and conservatives to call for swift federal action to stop the handouts. Every state but North Dakota, New Hampshire, Wisconsin and Wyoming gives applicants for either welfare benefits, driver’s licenses, or in some cases, mail-in ballots federal voter registration forms without demanding proof of citizenship. https://nypost.com/2025/06/17/us-news/fbi-delivers-intel-to-congress-on-alleged-chinese-plot-to-interfere-in-2020-election/ FBI delivers intel to Congress on alleged Chinese plot to interfere in 2020 election Your article is a lie. Stephen Miller was not wrong that there was a lot of fraud.

That information was literally the reason the case got dismissed. How much more credible do you need? It was submitted and accepted in a court of law. And there you go, trying to derail another thread by making it about semantics and sources. The source is credible. It is a legal foundation. The information came from FOIA filings. Also, you know you implied that the information was bad because sources weren't posted. Now you are trying to save face by trying to use semantics to get out of it. All so you can derail a thread and distract from the fact that your fantasy world isn't real. Wake up. Stop dreaming.

Yes, there is evidence: https://aflegal.org/press-release/america-first-legals-investigation-reveals-the-biden-white-house-was-involved-with-the-mar-a-lago-raid-and-that-nara-misled-congress-afl-launches-additional-investigation/ However, new NARA records obtained through AFL’s investigation into the circumstances surrounding the Mar-a-Lago raid further confirmed that the FBI obtained access to these records through a “special access request” from the Biden White House on behalf of the Department of Justice (DOJ). https://aflegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/SS-1-1024x880.png This stunning revelation suggests that NARA was misleading Congress about the White House’s role in the shocking raid of President Trump’s home, and the fact that the Biden White House was acting “on behalf of” the DOJ raises significant legal concerns. That coordination got the case dismissed. Are you just not aware of reality or do you say these things hoping no one will notice?

Lmao ... you think opinion pieces or pieces backed by dirty government officials is proof. Don't lie. Did you beleive: The hunter laptop wasn't real and accurate? Trump was a Russian spy? The Trump prosecutions were not coordinate? Hillary didn't pay for the Steele Dossier? You had "proof" for all of those, right? And your proof was complete and utter bullshit. Thats because you don't post truth. You post opinions that you desperately want to be true because they prop up your fantasy world.

Here: Its amazing how much you project. Talking about how taxes are paid by the end user in a thread about tariffs is not derailing a thread. That was a perfect example of exploring a tangent. You, however, claiming we were derailing your thread was a childish tantrum. You demanded proof. Absent a search button, I just don't have time to dig up all the examples. So the next best solution was to ask everyone here. They agree with me. You derail threads. You favorite tactics are listed in my signature below. You especially love number 1 and 2. Are you going to deny that you attack news sources if you don't like what they report? You don't attack other posters? Face it, you are the king of derailers. The Napoleon of derailers if you will.

Thats a random assumption. How did you get there? Robo wanted proof he derails threads. Since the search function doesn't work, I asked the opinion of the brain trust that is repolitics. They agreed with me. It was a bit of a gamble *snickers* they could have said he doesn't. But I knew he derailed threads with his ad homonim attacks and his incessant need to only read sources that fit his fantasy world.

He wanted proof he derails threads. What better proof than a near unanimous vote?

Yes. He's lying. He had been given a security clearance, at Comey's request, and then he started leaking classified docs to literal friends at news outlets. The evidence is there, you just refuse to look at it.

Yeah...that's what that story is about. I needed a place to deposit it so it got a loose tie in.

Someone gets it.

Somebody get him a mirror.

Quit trying to derail my thread about how you are derailing threads.

We don't have inner city slums. That's racist.

Why is Trump deporting non criminals? Because jobs baby. Because housing baby. Because it's the law bìtch.

6-1 says you derail threads. Did you vote for yourself?

Derailing another thread?

Comey didnt want to be left out: So, Comey leaked classified docs to this "media whisperer". His goal was to make himself look better and shape the media narrative. In so doing, Comey gave the guy classified info to leak to the press. These guys were just awful.

It wasn't his mistake. He's just pointing out that a typo/mispelling/auto correct criticisms are not really indicative of a well reasoned argument. Can you see how a phone might autocorrect martial to marital? Or just a slight typo would be missed by spell check? Don't be that petty.

Fify

Not surprised in the least. All democrat leaders do is lie. They said Trump was stealing classified documents to leak them but it was Adam "I don't live in California" Schiff.

We were talking about tariffs. We then started about who pays taxes and, as an example, I brought up that my employer pays my taxes and their customers pay their taxes. Just like the consumer in America pays the tariffs. Just because that example got drawn out, doesn't mean we derailed. You, on the other hand, will turn any thread into about how much you hate Trump. We could start a thread about jam and some how, it will be Trump's fault. There won't even be a problem. It'll just be jam is Trump's fault.

He says he doesn't, I say he does. You guys prove one of us wrong.