gatomontes99

Precrime! Someone call Tom Cruise! Oh, wait, he's already on it. He knew.

Lmao...ok skippy.

Yeah, but we faxed that his year.

He has values. But those values have more to do with money and transactions.

So you can't quote the EO? There is no language in there that makes flag burning illegal? Did you lie? I thought you had read the EO.

Well, we like to hold our mentally ill people up as role models.

@herbie I am still waiting.

Red flag laws sound good, in theory. We saw, in the "me too" movement, that people abuse laws that presume guilt.

The Maldives are still there: https://visitmaldives.com/en 100% of the predictions are wrong in timing and scope 100% of the time.

Nope. We wont make it a state. Just a colony, like Puerto Rico.

And you have no peer-reviewed scientific articles that have accurately predicted changes. You don't get to be wrong 100% of the time and then claim to be THE authority on the matter. Life doesn't work that way. If you want to be taken seriously, be right at least once. Until then, your peer-reviewed articles mean nothing.

Rumor is that he is trans. Let's take a beat and wait for the reports to settle on reality. There is a safe assumption that the shooter is mentally ill. Normal people don't do this.

@herbie I am still waiting.

Apparently science and fantasy are one and the same in your world. In my world, scientists have to be right at least some of the time. For 50+ years, climate scientists have been wrong about wvery single doom and gloom prediction. Every....single....one. Do you know what I do with people that are reliably wrong? I do the opposite of what they say.

Lmao...one...I don't beleive that happened. Two...the Chief of Police would have official knowledge. He would have likely been informed so as to prevent blue on blue.

Wow, this is crazy. Did the J6 committee suppress potentially relevant information?

I love how Doge os guilty of a leak that might of happened, but didn't.

In his mind, he's always right...even when he contradicts himself.

You really love that appeal to authority fallacy, don't you? Fifty years of predictions from "peer-reviewed scientific" papers used to create doom and gloom headlines that never came true leaves me unimpressed with your latest doom and gloom prediction.

Lmao...yep...it is all over the world wide interwebbers by now. Lmao. The black web.

I will just leave this right here for the parishioners of this grand forum to peruse. https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-of-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions/ 1967: ‘Dire famine by 1975. 1969: ‘Everyone will disappear in a cloud of blue steam by 1989.’ 1970: Ice age by 2000 1970: ‘America subject to water rationing by 1974 and food rationing by 1980.’ 1971: ‘New Ice Age Coming’ 1972: New ice age by 2070 1974: ‘New Ice Age Coming Fast’ 1980: ‘Acid Rain Kills Life in Lakes’ 1988: James Hansen forecasts increase regional drought in 1990s 1988: Washington DC days over 90F to from 35 to 85 1988: Maldives completely under water in 30 years 1989: Rising seas to ‘obliterate’ nations by 2000 2000: ‘Children won’t know what snow is.’ 2002: Famine in 10 years 2004: Britain to have Siberian climate by 2020 2008: Al Gore warns of ice-free Arctic by 2013 2009: Prince Charles says only 8 years to save the planet 2009: UK prime minister says 50 days to ‘save the planet from catastrophe’ 2013: Arctic ice-free by 2015 2014: Only 500 days before ‘climate chaos’

@herbie I'm waiting.

Then quote the part that says they will just prosecute for burning the flag and only for burning the flag. I mean, it's like a 1 page EO. I can't find it, but surely you can quote the part that says to prosecute only for burning the flag.

You defend Joe Biden's banana republic style persecution of enemies like Trump. Don't talk to us about ethics.