Jump to content

CdnFox

Senior Member
  • Posts

    41,275
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    351

Everything posted by CdnFox

  1. They vote in fear of people they don't even know about? LOL Nice trick Nope - it ain't fear kiddo We on the left hate you!!!! You're scum -- we wish you were dead and we'll hunt you down!!! Hey.. why are you banding together against us???? LOL - Leffties never change. They spread hatred and bigotry wherever they go, then get mad when that's turned against them. You never learn do you Well - there you go.
  2. Ummm - that is literally what you said ? Sooo yeah, not really a lie is it Dumbest comment ever. And this is the internet so it had some stiff competition. The definition of facist is NOT 'doesn't criticize people you don't like". Sorry. No she doesn't - she claims they're not real democrats first She attacks anyone who doesn't agree with HER thinking of what a democrat should be. Kind of like how everyone who doesn't agree with you is a fascist. SO she doesn't attack anyone she thinks is a 'real' democrat - just those ones who are too right wing to be 'real' democrats. Still not how it works. Previously explained. Yes you are. You're literally saying anyone who doesn't attack fascists is a fascist. And not just fascists but ones you identify as being so only. So everyone who disagrees with you is a fascist. It's one of the lefts favorite games - just change the definition of a word that sounds scary and use it wherever you like
  3. ROFLMAO - no, it just means you criticize the left. THat's actually what you just said and you screwed it up - and there is nothing left of literal fascists - fascists ARE left. He does - you just choose to ignore it But it would hardly matter. I mean seriously - think about how daft what you're saying is - AOC only critisizes the right - does that make her fascist? Tonnes of news outlets on the left ONLY critisize the right - does that make them facist? There are those who focus on certain elements of the culture war - and that just means that's where their focus is, it doesn't mean they're facist. Fascism doesn't even have anything to do with being 'critical' of anyone. You're just using the term to cover up your own fascist tendencies.
  4. I think it'll depend on who the republicans put up. His approval ratings are historic-low. People will dump him in 1 second if they see a better chocie. IF trump isn't the candidate i wouldn't be surprised to see him as a rare one termer.
  5. Depends on how you look at it. Based on his birth date, yes, but seeing as i'm pretty sure he died about 7 years ago and hasn't kept moving some might argue we shoudn't be keeping track like that any more....
  6. No, it refutes your point. Those people have no knowledge of or interaction with the newcomers so they have no fear of them. Whats driving the far right is the same as what did in Germany in the 20's - people like you spewing hatred and pursuing a facist agenda based on your bigotry. It forces otherwise rational people to feel they have to choose a side. Obviously they're not going to choose yours - you literally hate them. So it pushes them into the arms of the far right. Left wing hatred spawns right wing hatred in response. Always has.
  7. Agreed - your story was stupid. And as usual based on your hatred and bigotry towards conservatives. What a sad person you are. So there's the real reason guys - people like this one live in cities and nobody outside of the city wants to be like them
  8. No, that's just you projecting what you want him to be on his words. There's simply no truth to it. First - if you dismiss someone's argument as "wrong" because of one word in it - then you have no ability to think rationally and should be considered a child. No, he frequently criticizes others and always has. BUT - interestingly it's always the left who attacks him. The right tends to blow off his negative comments. So that's where a lot of the interaction winds up. Sorry but you're seeing him through an echo-chamber confirmation bias lens - all you see is when he talks about the left.
  9. And the look on his face after he corrects himself - it's like 'Did i get that right that time? Is it china or canada, these days i get them confused...."
  10. And here we see how our allies think of us right now.
  11. the population growth is 100 percent immigration or very close to - while people are born just as many die (or move out of canada). So without immigration we'd have stagnant or falling populations. This is actually true of many advanced nations now.
  12. I don't know .... I tried using what i was told was an 'environmentally friendly' horse once. It didn't go well. It seemed like there was only one charging port available so i tried that. WHAM! Kicked right in the nuts. Until i figure out how to disable the security system on them i just don't see them as a popular option,.
  13. Yeah - again tho i'm not seeing much of a difference between conservative federal gov'ts and libs there. The firearms issue is more likely to be a factor and that kind of ties in to what you said sort of but honestly - other than oil extraction where are the two signficantly different in the eyes of the rural person, most of whom aren't in oil extraction.
  14. https://www.statista.com/statistics/444906/number-of-immigrants-in-canada/ https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/reports-statistics/research/recent-immigrants-metropolitan-areas-canada-comparative-profile-based-on-2001-census/partg.html https://www.cicnews.com/2021/02/where-canadas-immigrants-settled-in-2020-0217293.html#gs.sxqfqg
  15. China won't be 'banding' with anyone. They don't share power. At most they'll accept they can't seize full power just yet You'll note they didn't give the russians a lot of arms. A tiny trickle and now it's all about peace talks. And saudi won't be giving its' relationship up with the us anytime soon. They'll dance with china hoping the us will get a little jealous and sweeten things for them (maybe buy some flowers) and that will be that. THat doesn't make the situaton harmless - but there's no chance of the west getting "frozen out" of anything just yet. China's doing this because they're afraid THEY are about to be frozen out and need to open new markets, and russia is about to become a very willing buyer of critical components for all kinds of weapons and other goods.
  16. The US already won that war. They've profited immensely and even if ukraine fell today that wouldn't change. They gained a hell of a lot. So - that's not why china is looking to step in. Did you want to take another crack at it and see if you can guess? or did you want it explained to you? It's no shame if you're unsophisticated enough in world politics not to get it on your own.
  17. Oh right - you've got no sense of humour. Sorry - i forget sometimes that you're not a real little boy.
  18. Well if it's the chinese don't spook 'em - i hear they give you money
  19. They prefer to conquor their fears and discover the whole world. That's why virtually every civilization starts off right wing before the left eventually brings it down
  20. Sorry - that's just not true. It's the kind of thing lefties tell other lefties in order to make themselves feel better about being lefties. Conservatives don't let fear or obstacles hold them back - while lefties don't let facts or reason hold them back LOL
  21. Actually research shows that it's typically what we'd call right leaning types who do almost all the exploring. So it was most likely them. Turns out lefties prefer to stay at home in the trees and tell other people how to live while demanding somone bring them a banana
  22. One should preceed the other. The other would just be a distraction. And we'd need scope and funding. Otherwise it's just a joke to make people feel better.
  23. Probably the simplest explanation,
  24. I'd already replied - see right above your post there. And always be careful of listening to jagmeet He was basically doing justin a favour
  25. Ok - found it. So here's what happened - the NDP made a motion that would STOP looking at china... in favor of one that would look at ALL interference from EVERYWHERE. But it had no budget - no porposed timeline, and no details as to how it would report or have any real teeth. Basically it left the libs off the hook for china. They could say "well - we're going to take 3 years and do this right and look at every country - i myself am headed off to jamacia for a week to search the beaches for clues. " and it turns away from china buying the Libs to Russian bots posting on the internet. The CPC wants to deal with the china issue first and get answers. We can go from there with other countries
×
×
  • Create New...