Americana Antifa

You can make the argument that conservatives are being consistent when they cut taxes for the rich. But how does one explain subsidies and bailouts for the rich? Endless wars? Banning abortion? Not exactly "small government" there. So when you say things like: you kinda know you're talking out of your ass. You acknowledge that we all depend on government to have a functioning society. Not sure which one of the voices in your head you're arguing with there. I've never heard anyone say they want to wipe out the rich. Maybe commies want that, though they're a pretty small faction of the Left these days. No, I'm saying you're stupid for saying people vote this way or that way because they depend on government. Society as a whole depends on government. When you say you're against defunding the police, you're acknowledging that we depend on police to keep society functioning.

So in other words, you have no evidence. I'm not going to swap info with you so I can make a bet that you'd never accept you lost. Name some celebrities who have been cancelled.

I don't have his number. Do you not know who the Anglo-Khazarians are? If so, it's kinda strange to be talking about them.

Who are the Anglo-Khazarians? What is the Anglo-Khazarian mafia?

At least y'all are doing better than America.

? I have plenty of evidence! It's... um... dude, damn, just go look for it. I promise it's there!

Obviously, it's satire, so there's a slight exaggeration. But conservatives will support fascist politicians like Donald Trump, Viktor Orbán, Giorgia Meloni, and Benjamin Netanyahu. Then when you point out that these people are reactionary and anti-democracy, which is fascism, they'll say the line "you think anyone who disagrees with you is fascist!" Orbán is a literal dictator who was invited to speak at CPAC. But if you say this is an example of CPAC embracing fascism, they'll say the line.

If you don't know what free speech is, sure. And yet these "small government" conservatives don't mind spending taxes on helping the rich. Interesting how that works. It's also pretty funny how baby-brains think anyone stands on their own in a society, as if you built the roads you drive on. You're against the government doing things, but you're also against defunding the police, because on some level you know that we ALL rely on government.

I was referring to ideological liberals. I don't know as much about the Liberal Party.

Name one example. Shouldn't be hard if there's that many.

The link here is about people speaking on college campuses and being held socially accountable for speech, not actual freedom of speech. This is pretty much just code that means women are more supportive of policy that helps the workers, as opposed to policy that helps the rich. Conservative politicians spend more than other politicians. They're not about "small government." If they were, then they'd be against subsidies and bailouts for the rich, as well as unnecessary wars. I didn't bother reading the rest of this article, which I'm almost positive was written by a 15 year old boy.

Yeah, they wouldn't have done as well, but keep in mind that all three of them are celebrities who were pretty well-known before running. Especially Oz, who (unfortunately) was a household name. I think Trump's endorsement helped them, but not that much. They're right-wing celebrities, they would have had support regardless.

Nah. Liberals are bad, but they're not horrifically bad.

Alright, so you don't have any examples. I don't expect you to admit you were wrong, you're too much of a puss for that. Typical conservative. And I guess you also won't admit that you lied about me saying it's okay to hate men or white people. What does it tell you that conservatives have to lie and deflect to defend their dogshit takes?

I gave you an example of the Right trying to get someone cancelled. You really don't have ANY examples of the Left or the Center trying to do that? Really none?!!! Actually, Agnosticism is the belief that you can't know whether or not gods exists. Atheism is the lack of belief that there are gods. Atheists don't necessarily believe we can't know whether gods exist, they could just think we have yet to discover evidence. By the way, if someone actually did believe it's impossible for gods to exist, then it would be on that person to present evidence, just like it would be on a Theist to present evidence. In both cases, the person with the belief needs to put up or shut up. Depends on the setting. In a debate setting, it would be on you to present evidence of commonly held knowledge if you're being challenged on that knowledge. If your answer to people challenging your beliefs is "no, u" then you probably shouldn't be here. I did and I didn't find any examples. The truth is, these examples don't exist. That's why you're just deflecting now. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate what you're doing. There are a lot of normies and fence-sitters here who read these threads. When they see that you don't have any examples of left-wing "cancel culture," they probably start to question the narrative, which is good. Blah blah blah. Stop being triggered and tell me when I said that it's okay to hate men or white people. I know conservatives are cowards, but maybe you can just admit that you lied. You'd be the first fashy ever to own up to a lie.

I'm listening. Atheism isn't a belief, it's the lack of a belief. If you believe in something, it's on you to present evidence for it. So when it comes to Theism, it would be on the Theist to present evidence to the Atheist. And when it comes to this propaganda idea that the Left is trying to have tons of shit deplatformed or banned, it's up to the people who believe this to present evidence for it. Well I already agree that in any population there will be fringe elements. What I'm saying is that it's not common among the Left or the Center, certainly not nearly as common as it is among the Right. In order to change my mind, you'd have to give examples like the attempted cancellation of David Pakman. In that situation, there are mainstream right-wing politicians and pundits calling on people to get him cancelled. There is an actual crazed mob contacting Pakman's sponsors and demanding they drop him. To be fair, I can't keep up with all of the right-wing conspiracy theories. But that article did prove my point. The Democrats contacted Twitter over content that shouldn't have been there in the first place. Oh, this was a different issue. Yeah, they were correct for not allowing this also. And either way, it doesn't prove your point. Twitter regularly suppresses stories that they suspect are disinformation. They didn't suppress all Hunter Biden stories, even many of the conspiracy theories were regularly discussed on Twitter. Also, they never changed the TOS to benefit Democrats. They only did that for Republicans. I think the reason you're getting mad is because I keep bringing this up. Do you have any evidence or are you lying again? I know conservatives are disconnected from reality, but when you're talking to someone who isn't conservative, you have to expect to be called on your lies. So, when did I say it was okay to hate men or white people?

?

Uh-huh... What does she mean by "Anglo-Khazarian" exactly?

Fascists are too cowardly to admit they just don't want trans people to have rights.

My statement was that leftists and liberals very rarely try to get people fired. The fact there you don't have examples of them doing do is what proves my point. Atheists don't have to present evidence that there are no gods. It's up to Theists to present the evidence, since they believe god/gods exist. It's the same thing here. I don't believe there is evidence that leftists and liberals try to get people "cancelled." If you disagree, present some evidence. https://www.businessinsider.com/twitter-files-show-biden-campaign-asked-remove-tweets-hunter-biden-2022-12 ROFLMAO!!!! You didn't actually watch the Twitter Files hearings, did you? Source? Like I said, there are exceptions, but there are reasons for them. You can discriminate based on religion if your business is religion-oriented. I'm sure there are also exceptions for political discrimination in which it's illegal. But generally, it is legal to deplatform or kick out people based on politics. WTF? When did I say that was okay?

"Anglo-Khazarian," eh?

Source? Nope. What actually happened is the Biden campaign requested that Twitter take down nude pics of Hunter Biden. These pics being on Twitter is illegal under the "revenge porn" law. So basically, the phony outrage over Democrats trying to get info on Hunter Biden pulled was really just Democrats trying to get illegal nudes pulled. Don't worry, you can still find pics of Hunter's dick. Yes, but the law allows private companies to discriminate, as long as it's not discrimination based on protected class. Again, when you put on your nazi uniform, that you usually only wear at the meetings, and go to the local bar, you get kicked out. It doesn't matter that nazism is your political belief, because that's not a protected class.

You literally argued that Big Tech is biased against conservatives. Stop proving the Dunning-Kruger effect.