robosmith

Receipt DOES NOT override Delaware confidentiality LAW. Is there NO confidentiality in Canada? LMAO. The ONLY brainwashed here are those who believe a receipt voids LEGAL REQUIREMENTS.

No bending required. So many laws violated BY THE DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFO. LMAO.

I won't. And neither will US courts if the chain of custody cannot be proven or the "evidence" contained on it is like the opinions you post here. AKA, bullshit.

^Intellectual BANKRUPTCY. AGAIN. Why even post here when all you have is BULLSHIT?

Very bad for the shop owner who violated Delaware LAW by giving A laptop to Giuliani.

Like I said: ^NO EVIDENCE. Biden implementing US policy had NOTHING to do with HIS SON. IOW, YOU are CONFUSED. AGAIN.

More illustrations of what happened for the simpletons to better understand.

And Putin. Those companies saw their chance to influence the midterm elections. Fortunately they FAILED for the most part.

Justice understands that the contents of a laptop can be modified by criminals when it falls into their hands. Prove the chain of custody of the laptop in question.

Prove it. Prove the chain of custody for that laptop.

Your mere proclamation of ^this doesn't make it true.

Yes, your IGNORANT POSTS ARE.

Which doesn't override Delaware LAW. which PROHIBITS DISCLOSURE of CONFIDENTAL CONTENTS. Of course you have NO EVIDENCE ^this is the ACTUAL chain of custody. OTOH, it MOST LIKELY went through SEVERAL ILLEGAL HANDS BEFORE ending up with the FBI. Meet the computer repairman at the center of New York Post's Hunter Biden laptop story Of course you don't care about CRIMES nor the FRUIT of the POISONOUS tree. But US COURTS DO.

You might BELIEVE ^this fantasy, but you HAVE NO EVIDENCE Joe Biden took any such actions. Of course right wingers here only believe in innocent until PROVEN guilty for Republicans, right? Bet you can't even cite ANY reporting by reputable news orgs that happened.

^Just your delusions SANS EVIDENCE. Do you really believe people are entitled to NO PRIVACY for their personal information? Guess you're all for fishing expeditions without warrants by the Feds, right? ?

IF ^this were true, Hunter would have been indicted already; but only if the "evidence" were admissible in court. So either it's COMPLETELY FALSE or the "evidence" is inadmissible; possibly because leaking it was AGAINST DELAWARE LAW. Confidential is confidential in DE. Unfortunate that you're never able to follow your delusions to their ILLOGICAL conclusion.

It IS legal to cross the border and apply for ASYLUM. As RULED by the JUDGE who hears the CASE. Duh. Of course you IMAGINE you KNOW THE LAW BETTER, but that is FALSE.

It's called an ANALOGY dipshit.

No crime there. Joe was IMPLEMENTING US and European POLICY. You do know that President Obama had the authority to set US policy, don't you? LMAO

Of course if what YOU SAY was supported by YOUR CITE, YOU could have QUOTED THAT. I'm sure there's a REASON WHY YOU DID NOT. Instead YOU'RE JUST PRETENDING it supports YOUR CLAIM THAT "Newsom could have stored it all for the farmers." From YOUR CITE:

You said Biden "invited them." Leaving your door unlocked is NEVER a legal invitation to enter your house, LIAR! Of course you HAVE TO LIE, because you have NO LEGITIMATE argument.

Yeah, "joke" is the excuse Trump always uses when he says REALLY STUPID THINGS like ADMITTING TO CRIMES.

So you STILL DON'T UNDERSTAND even AFTER the fact check EXPLAINED IT TO YOU. LMAO

Because you believe being asleep is better? LMAO No reason to believe ^this OPINION.

I didn't know Canadian colleges awarded Master's in right wing BULLSHIT. LMAO