robosmith

I ONLY know that you've presented NO EVIDENCE, and legal standards HERE are "innocent until PROVEN guilty." AKA, the BURDEN is ON YOU. All the reports support the FACT that Joe had NO INTENT to keep the documents nor steal them in the first place.

No REASON to believe ^this OPINION. All you have is gratuitous CLAIMS. ?

Your cite at Fox Lies says NOTHING about "lefties' false allegations." All it says is Douchowitz and Giuffre have agreed to end their legal battle with NO ADMIMISSION of wrong doing except that Giuffre has admitted possible misidentification. When are YOU going to apologize for YOUR false allegations against "lefties"?

All the videos of Joe that "resurfaced" 2 years ago are the SAME ORIGINAL VIDEO I CITED. Duh. Maybe your slang makes sense in Canada, but it just makes you look stupid to us Americans.

Too bad you're unable to cite ANY EVIDENCE, like always. Did the story change from 15 years ago that I cited? Guess we'll never know.

"Has the worst schools" does not mean what you've ASSUMED it means. YOUR ASSUMPTIONS do NOT define the meaning. Just like YOUR ASSUMPTIONS of EXPECTED evidence for NOT RAINED. IF ANY of FL schools are "the worst," it is entirely accurate.

Probably only among the Trump CULT MEMBERS.

YOU brought it up HERE (from HOW LONG AGO?). What's pathetic is YOU misrepresenting an anecdote about 60 years ago to TRY to tar Joe. But I guess that's the BEST YOU GOT. :applause:

But you've completely FAILED to substantiate ANY part of ^this OPINION. ANYONE CAN WRITE ANY WORDS THEY WANT HERE. Means NOTHING without EVIDENCE.

Did they teach you about the biology of stages of sexual development in the womb where you got your degree in statistics? IF you ever got a degree at all....

Don't know, don't care. The point is YOU got the story WRONG and have not apologized like Joe said HE did. AFAIK, Joe's story is the ONLY reason YOU'RE talking about "Corn Pop." You know it says something good about Joe AND not good about YOU, that you have to go to a story from 60 years ago to TRY to tar Joe. Do you have ANY EVIDENCE Joe's story was not accurate? Maybe you can dig up some witness from 60 years ago if it's that important to you. LMAO

^Lying again. Joe armed himself with a chain, but didn't have to fight at all.

The FACT is, Joe never said he beat up Corn Pop and someone (Fox?) LIED to you. YOUTUBE starting ~4:25 Joe tells the story of APOLOGIZING to Corn Pop and not fighting him because he apologized. Now it's your turn to apologize for LYING about Joe. Bet you don't have as much class as Joe.

Who told you he did? Did you see that on Fox LIes? LMAO

He also told less LIES than YOU, but that whataboutism means NOTHING.

Do you STILL not understand the DIFFERENCE between stealing documents with the INTENT of KEEPING them and LYING ABOUT NOT KNOWING YOU HAVE THEM when they're in YOUR DESK and giving them back as soon as they're discovered? Clue for you Canadians: INTENT is VERY IMPORTANT in US LAW.

You mean like when the SCOTUS completely BROKE from a PRECEDENT set 50 years ago? LMAO. Got news for YOU, precedent is NOT STRONG NOR BINDING HERE.

No it's Trump's LIE that it didn't RAIN, and you admitted it "drizzled" which IS RAIN. Merrium-Webster But enough of YOUR LIES. ?

Do you even understand the meaning of that "clicky little term like 'whataboutism'"? It means you're ignoring something that's alleged, by SUGGESTION it's NO WORSE than something else. AKA defense by pure deflection, rather than addressing the allegation.

I've given you plenty of evidence and you just make EXCUSES for ignoring it. Have you read ANY of the SWORN testimony by Republicans working in Trump's WH from the Jan 6th Final Report yet? I didn't think so. Because you don't WANT to know the truth about what happened.

Why would I go on a fishing expedition looking for support for YOUR OPINIONS when YOU can't even post ANY evidence to back them up? What you're talking about might be as ANCIENT as the "Summer of Love" (1967?) to which you keep cryptically referring. LMAO I know Maxine has said some shit that CONS don't like, but she's just a House member and not at all influential. That's why I pay NO ATTENTION to what she says. Duh.

WTH is "dirty doggery"? No one cares about ALLEGATIONS. NOT HAVING EVIDENCE of FRAUD is why Trump et al LOST 60+ court challenges to the CERTIFIED VOTE COUNTS.

AGAIN, NO EVIDENCE for your allegations. Why do you keep destroying your credibility by posting ONLY your OPINIONS? Maybe cause you're LYING?

Don't know what Omar has done, but Schiff and Swalwell did a bang up job on BOTH impeachment committees. AGAIN, you have NO EVIDENCE that EITHER is a "crook" or "traitor." There is NOTHING illegal about presenting evidence at an impeachment hearing.

I didn't say "good," I said NOT terrible. I have not watched her enough to know one way or the other since she's quite new. Do you watch her on CSPAN?