robosmith

You're not big on economic analysis when it comes to your partisan agenda, are ya. Of course you're not paying for our Southern "wall," and it will probably SAVE YOU MONEY since US is paying for it. ?

Yes, ^this is pathetic. But much more expected than incredible.

Show where I have made ANY predictions comparable to your childish calendar reading etc wrt the midterms.

Most certainly full of lies. Naval officers are NOT "soldiers." And Carter is certainly NOT to blame for the Soviets invading Afghanistan, nor OPEC hiking gas prices. Those principals are solely responsible for THEIR actions. His worst mistake was his humanitarian gesture of allowing a long time ally of the US (the Shah) into the US for medical treatment, which caused hatred and retaliation against him by Iranians. Of course Jimmy had nothing to do with the antipathy against Shaw Reza Pahlavi who was installed by a CIA engineered coup against a democratically elected leader.

Why Fox News Lied to Its Viewers

Look you didn't post your link, so I used a cite that said the same thing. Next time post your source. And I don't believe ANY CRAP that Ratcliffe puts out cause he's just a partisan hack Trump stooge with NO QUALIFICATIONS for Dir of Intel. Trump Drops Plans to Nominate John Ratcliffe as Director of National Intelligence

No need to "sway" me. You've already confirmed my estimation of sources YOU will reject.

So my estimation of sources you will reject was correct. ?

George Santos and the Missing $365,000

ALL I "revealed" is my estimation of sources YOU WILL REJECT. Which is WHY I AVOID POSTING THEM HERE. Of course you didn't answer my question, AGAIN. I'll take that as a 'NO' you have NO quote of me saying what YOU CLAIMED I SAID.

Either post where I "admit" that or apologize. What I don't "open my my mind to" is sources which have a DEMONSTRATED lack of credibility. AKA, right wing propaganda sites which DO NOT adhere to professional journalistic standards of ETHICS. Are you going to "open your mind" to motherjones.com or moveon.org? How about MSNBC.com? If something is really true, it WILL BE REPORTED by a CREDIBLE source.

You are confusing SPECIFIC CONTENT on the laptop with to what Schiff referred. AKA, your cite is OUT OF CONTEXT. IF YOU CARE ABOUT THE TRUTH, consider the WHOLE CONTEXT of what Schiff SAID. "This whole smear" means the entire campaign of Russian disinformation targeting Joe Biden, NOT specific laptop contents. ?

Your ABUSIVE responses are a CHILDISH POOR SUBSTITUTE for making actual points. LMAO

It was ONLY "clearly" when Trump made up that excuse several days LATER. NO ONE was laughing when he said that, LEAST OF ALL Trump. He confirmed that he REALLY WANTED to SEE Hillary's emails in a FOLLOW UP QUESTION from Katy Tur. Trump cult members are truly gullible to believe ANYTHING Trump says. ㊙️ publicly admitted crimes are STILL crimes. How do YOU KNOW "it wasn't true"? Do you know how hard it is to prove a negative? The Republican led Senate Intelligence Committee Report DETAILED how and when Manafort colluded with Russian agent Kilimnik AND how HE shared that data with the Mueller indicted IRA. Post the evidence; not just idle GOSSIP or OPINION of ONE GUY. You don't prove fraudulent voting just by citing POSSIBILITIES.

No it would not. I have posted the EVIDENCE FOUND here MANY TIMES. The emails to which were referred are FOX's internal emails. No one said they are infallible. They are certainly subject to OPERATOR ERROR. You didn't answer the question. I'll take that as a 'no' you DON'T have objective evidence that Wikipedia has a "huge left wing bias." Given that it is publicly edited, I believe there is a lot of debate about the content, which you can see if you care to delve into that.

Given the "huge right wing bias" you have, why should anyone believe ^this OPINION? You got ANY objective EVIDENCE?

Your ALT-FACTS went out of style with Trump EXITING the WH. LMAO

Sure. Fox hosts were "just asking questions." LMAO And you buy that?

And Joe Biden AND most of NATO. YOU'RE on the side of Kleptocrat PUTIN. I'm not poor nor naive. I know what will happen if Putin succeeds in Ukraine. Do you?

Helping Ukraine to DEFEAT PUTIN'S INVADERS, does not make the war in Ukraine Biden's. ALL of the NATO countries are CONTRIBUTING WEAPONS. As said BEFORE, CHECK YOUR FACTS. And take off your partisan BLINDERS.

Couldn't find a cite from the National Enquirer? Even IF the FBI pressured Twitter to do something, that's not the same as the FBI lying.

You believe that Trump didn't tell 30k+ lies during his admin; are you on glue? At least you apparently back tracked on the rain during his inauguration speech. ?

In your FANTASIES. You just cannot handle the truth. Nor apparently know how to read. Physician HEAL THYSELF.

The people who CHOOSE the higher risk path, are MORE lucky the survived, cause we never know what lethal affliction will affect us in the worst way. Seems NOW we know that the obese are at particularly high risk. The 1 MILLION excess deaths were not lucky. Imagine how angry they would be if it was COVID instead. Such novel viruses are inherently more lethal cause no one has significant immunity.

You MIGHT believe differently IF you were one of the unlucky ones whose CASES of COVID put YOU in the ICU. Or worse. Of course you DIDN'T KNOW to which category YOU belonged UNTIL you got your THREE CASES of COVID. The FACT is that your CHANCES of SURVIVAL were a lot better with the VAX than without it. A real statistician would understand what that means. AKA, you were LUCKY. Like me, who didn't get even ONE CASE of COVID due to my masks and jabs.