Jump to content

robosmith

Senior Member
  • Posts

    23,676
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

Everything posted by robosmith

  1. It was what would happen if they used missiles carried by the F22 reconnaissance jets. It would crash uncontrolled. If they just puncture the balloon it would just drift down and NOT leave a large patch of debris. Presuming of course that the balloon doesn't POP. Only way those guys are going to bring it down with their pea shooters is if it pops. I think they might put a dozen small holes in it, but it will drift away before landing.
  2. You know if they just had a large crossbow, they could make a small puncture and bring it down without it crashing. Maybe even tow it to a preferred landing site.
  3. You're a funny guy. Don't quit your day job though.
  4. ^Nothing but evidence free claims. SLEEP WELL and DREAM ON. No one "has to realize" YOUR FANTASIES.
  5. I do believe that you are IMPERVIOUS to EVIDENCE of REALITY. Congrats on your belief in IGNORANCE.
  6. I NEVER said it's "from Russia" half wit. If you want to know what I think, I'll tell you if you ask nicely.
  7. Nope. I follow MANY leads. Certainly NOT your Fox Lies, nor the pathological LIAR Trump.
  8. Did you just make up that word: "woketards"? LMAO MANY MORE were laughing at Trump. Biden has regained RESPECT for the US. That is why he was ABLE TO LEAD NATO in helping the fight for UKRAINE. Guess you missed the baby Trump balloons when he visited the UK. Those were not signs of RESPECT.
  9. The proof was presented at the impeachment hearings. Do you EVER watch what's going on in Congress?
  10. Doesn't compare with your stupidity of denying official Congressional reports.
  11. Take it up with the Republican led Senate Intelligence Committee RUSSIAN ACTIVE MEASURES CAMPAIGNS AND INTERFERENCE IN THE 2016 U.S. ELECTION VOLUME 5: COUNTERINTELLIGENCE THREATS AND VULNERABILITIES report_volume5.pdf - Senate Intelligence Committee You patience will always "wear thin" when you embark on a FOOL'S ERRAND of denying the truth.
  12. I will make you choke on it. Like your previous "predictions." LMAO
  13. *I* didn't make that claim. YOU made the claim that it didn't happen. Apparently you don't know how to read, either.
  14. I'll take that as a compliment from the guy who has no knowledge of reality but posts that stupidity HERE.
  15. Because you CANNOT prove he lied. Apparently you don't know HOW to prove anything.
  16. HAHAHAHA. ^Imagines his SIMPLE declarations are proof. They are EVIDENCE you HAVE NO PROOF. ?
  17. And you IMAGINE YOUR "distinguish" is definitive. It's NOT.
  18. You don't understand how your polls are meaningless in determining ANY objective truth. Fallacy. Look it up.
  19. Doesn't matter. The law applies to the CONTENT which was not forfeitable to the shop owner. He could sell the hardware, but disclosing CONTENT is still ILLEGAL. Doesn't mean the content was NOT tampered with by Russians or others.
  20. Appeal to popularity FALLACY. Look it up if you don't understand "fallacy."
  21. Instead you "trust" a story that YOU CREATED in you head. That is INSANE. LMAO
  22. Of course you are LYING. The question is whether you have ANY understanding of how ILLOGICAL what you say is. Let's try this logic: IF "nobody likes the left," "the left" would never get elected. Does that help you understand how YOUR CLAIMS are PATENTLY ILLOGICAL and FALSE? Now let's hear another LIE about MASSIVE voter fraud, instead of the truth that Biden got 7 MILLION more votes than Trump. Your desperation is PATHETIC.
  23. Some posters here, like Trump, believe they are above the law. Except the "law" of whatever they can get away with. ?
×
×
  • Create New...