robosmith

That would be you Trump/Qanon cult members.

Most of the founders were Deists, NOT Christian. So you're going to convert, right?

Sorry but you don't get to decide what is "wrong behaviors." ?

Really? What violent crimes has AOC committed that proves your THESIS?

Your ^OPINIONS are NOT "facts."

That's what I said. Seems you're catching on. I KNOW it HAS BEEN the CHOICE of investors to put THEIR SHORT TERM PROFIT (wishes) above the NEEDS of society. That does NOT make it the OPTIMAL DECISION. Markets completely suck sometimes. Just because YOU SEE THAT as JUSTIFIED, does NOT make it RIGHT NOR BEST. There has been a LONG HISTORY, of INVESTOR DECISIONS driving the ECONOMY INTO THE DIRT. Esp when there is a near MONOPOLY scenario.

You CAN read, can't you? I pointed out where in YOUR CITE it says that INVESTORS are demanding high profits OVER PRODUCTION VOLUME. AKA, high prices. Too difficult for you?

Not what I said, LYING TROLL.

Thanks for admitting that it is INVESTORS who are demanding increased profits OVER PRODUCTION. From YOUR CITE: And it's working because the major oil companies have reported RECORD PROFITS. So much for blaming Biden, sorry.

You're not big on economic analysis when it comes to your partisan agenda, are ya. Of course you're not paying for our Southern "wall," and it will probably SAVE YOU MONEY since US is paying for it. ?

Yes, ^this is pathetic. But much more expected than incredible.

Show where I have made ANY predictions comparable to your childish calendar reading etc wrt the midterms.

Most certainly full of lies. Naval officers are NOT "soldiers." And Carter is certainly NOT to blame for the Soviets invading Afghanistan, nor OPEC hiking gas prices. Those principals are solely responsible for THEIR actions. His worst mistake was his humanitarian gesture of allowing a long time ally of the US (the Shah) into the US for medical treatment, which caused hatred and retaliation against him by Iranians. Of course Jimmy had nothing to do with the antipathy against Shaw Reza Pahlavi who was installed by a CIA engineered coup against a democratically elected leader.

Why Fox News Lied to Its Viewers

Look you didn't post your link, so I used a cite that said the same thing. Next time post your source. And I don't believe ANY CRAP that Ratcliffe puts out cause he's just a partisan hack Trump stooge with NO QUALIFICATIONS for Dir of Intel. Trump Drops Plans to Nominate John Ratcliffe as Director of National Intelligence

No need to "sway" me. You've already confirmed my estimation of sources YOU will reject.

So my estimation of sources you will reject was correct. ?

George Santos and the Missing $365,000

ALL I "revealed" is my estimation of sources YOU WILL REJECT. Which is WHY I AVOID POSTING THEM HERE. Of course you didn't answer my question, AGAIN. I'll take that as a 'NO' you have NO quote of me saying what YOU CLAIMED I SAID.

Either post where I "admit" that or apologize. What I don't "open my my mind to" is sources which have a DEMONSTRATED lack of credibility. AKA, right wing propaganda sites which DO NOT adhere to professional journalistic standards of ETHICS. Are you going to "open your mind" to motherjones.com or moveon.org? How about MSNBC.com? If something is really true, it WILL BE REPORTED by a CREDIBLE source.

You are confusing SPECIFIC CONTENT on the laptop with to what Schiff referred. AKA, your cite is OUT OF CONTEXT. IF YOU CARE ABOUT THE TRUTH, consider the WHOLE CONTEXT of what Schiff SAID. "This whole smear" means the entire campaign of Russian disinformation targeting Joe Biden, NOT specific laptop contents. ?

Your ABUSIVE responses are a CHILDISH POOR SUBSTITUTE for making actual points. LMAO

It was ONLY "clearly" when Trump made up that excuse several days LATER. NO ONE was laughing when he said that, LEAST OF ALL Trump. He confirmed that he REALLY WANTED to SEE Hillary's emails in a FOLLOW UP QUESTION from Katy Tur. Trump cult members are truly gullible to believe ANYTHING Trump says. ㊙️ publicly admitted crimes are STILL crimes. How do YOU KNOW "it wasn't true"? Do you know how hard it is to prove a negative? The Republican led Senate Intelligence Committee Report DETAILED how and when Manafort colluded with Russian agent Kilimnik AND how HE shared that data with the Mueller indicted IRA. Post the evidence; not just idle GOSSIP or OPINION of ONE GUY. You don't prove fraudulent voting just by citing POSSIBILITIES.

No it would not. I have posted the EVIDENCE FOUND here MANY TIMES. The emails to which were referred are FOX's internal emails. No one said they are infallible. They are certainly subject to OPERATOR ERROR. You didn't answer the question. I'll take that as a 'no' you DON'T have objective evidence that Wikipedia has a "huge left wing bias." Given that it is publicly edited, I believe there is a lot of debate about the content, which you can see if you care to delve into that.

Given the "huge right wing bias" you have, why should anyone believe ^this OPINION? You got ANY objective EVIDENCE?