Rebound

If you took the time to study the Federal Budget from a non-biased source, you would see that the problem cannot be solved through spending cuts. America has its lowest tax rates in at least 100 years. Put it this way: America had a balanced budget under Clinton. Then Bush showed up, slashed taxes and launched two unfunded wars. And Trump did the same thing on an even larger scale. So, at the least, we need Clinton-era tax rates.

When I vote by mail I’m able to look up the status of my ballot to ensure that it was received and counted. Here’s the thing: Your election denial is not based on fact, it is based on pure conspiracy and conjecture. “Ahh! But the ballots could have been lost, the machines could have been hacked, aliens could have contaminated the drinking water, etc etc” You have chosen to believe in a conspiracy theory. Of course there’s no way for us to disprove your belief in pure fantasy, but that’s all it is. It is make-believe. “If I win the election, I won. Otherwise, we’ll all pretend I won.” Your belief system is that you cannot possibly lose an election, but your side has been losing more than you’ve been winning. Every time we ask you for proof of your statements, your answer is that it’s just around the corner, the truth is out there, the Kraken will be released. It’s all BS that you’ve bought into and it is not going to get your people elected.

If greed is bad, then surely you agree that the wealthiest Americans should pay more in tax so that we can begin to pay off the National Debt, right?

If the law is so important that it should be passed, wouldn’t you agree that naming it after Pelosi is not the way to get it passed?

Your source is a network which swore under oath that its viewers know they don’t always tell the truth. When you teach students, do yo tell them to just watch Fox News and accept everything they say as absolutely true, and that everything else is false?

Even you are bright enough to realize the name is both an insult and an accusation leveled at Nancy Pelosi. That’s not how you get a bill passed in a bipartisan Congress.

Neilsen ratings

The fact that documents were found in Trump’s top desk drawer, stored with personal items including his passport, is strong evidence that Trump knew he had the documents and his refusal to return them after multiple requests, including court orders, is strong evidence that he intended to keep them. But there’s also evidence of theft of government property and obstruction of Justice.

Just because the thread title says something, does not make it true. The source of your article? Fox News. Yeah, believe them to tell you honestly that they crushed their competitors.

Pay attention little boy: That article listed the ratings of CABLE NEWS. But ABC, CBS and NBC are BROADCAST NEWS. Not Cable News. Broadcast. I posted the Neilson ratings, and combined, ABC, NBC and CBS are vastly larger than Fox in prime time.

You’re the guy who continually makes broad statements without producing any proof, and when pressed, your answer is “whoosh.”

They have no such laws. The foxes who guard the hen houses don’t want such laws.

Well, swishy, or whooshy, whatever you are… You said that it’s very different when a VP removed Classified documents. YOUR CLAIM. So whoosh your ass up an explanation why. Federal law doesn’t say so. And, by the way, prosecutors in Trump’s case have so far listed theft of government property and obstruction of Justice, not removal of classified information.

Those beans aren’t going to sprout into a beanstalk, jack

So according to a website that posts crap you want to hear…. That there is “No question” Trump had the authority to declassify material. There is definitely a lot of questions about that There is not a US Federal Law which says that a President can issue an invisible declassification order, and no-one needs to be informed. There IS a Federal Appellate decision which says the President CANNOT issue “invisible” declassification orders. The standing WRITTEN executive order says that declassification needs to follow a procedure. How’s this? We get that you WANT Trump to be innocent, but don’t you give a shlt about anything? What if the documents were nuclear secrets, or the design of our latest weapons, or a list of spies inside of Russia? Do you think Trump should have declassified material which he didn’t even read, just because he carried it somewhere? Because… if it is declassified, that makes it PUBLIC. It is not secret anymore. Putin and the leaders of China are allowed to read ALL that material, because of the invisible secret order. Is that so?

YOU SAID that there is a “world of difference” between a VP removing classified documents and a President removing classified documents. SHOW US THAT LAW.

Where are the two bags of ballots? You found a link to twelve ballots in ultra-liberal a California. Where are the two bags? And how is two bags enough to overturn the results of a nationwide election?

Hey bulIshlt artist… YOU said Fox News has higher ratings than CBS. Didn’t you say that? Yes or No? So I pulled the Neilson ratings, and you can see for yourself that CBS has higher prime time ratings than Fox News. Nielsen ratings are the ratings which TV advertising buy-ins are based upon. They are the gold standard of accuracy.

And if you pull your head out of your ass, you’d know that CBS has a substantially larger prime time audience than Fox News.

What do you have against Jesus? I’m just asking…

Spoken like a true mooron. "Facts don't matter"

Show us the ratings. What am I thinking? You're WAY too dumb to research basic facts, so here they are: https://www.scribd.com/document/621686307/Week-of-Jan-16-Sorted-by-Total-Viewers#download&from_embed https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/week-of-jan-16-evening-news-ratings-world-news-tonight-continues-to-outpace-competition-despite-week-to-week-losses/522615/ For the week of January 16, 2023: Total average primetime viewership: ABC: 8,777k NBC: 7,446k CBS: 5,476k Fox: 1,996k MSNBC: 943K CNN: 444K HLN: 175K CNBC: 161K Newsmax: 113K Newsnation: 87K

You’re the one who thinks that tolerance is evil. Was Jesus intolerant? No, he was forgiving, again and again.

Close your eyes and pretend Santos is a Democrat. Then you’ll see how absolutely blind you are to truth. Santos lied about EVERYTHING in his background. He didn’t go to college at all; he didn’t work for any Wall St firms at all. He has no securities education or licenses at all. He lied about his mother and his religion and his family and his non-existent real estate holdings. Add to that: He only made $50K a year until he ran for office and then inexplicably was able to loan himself $700,000. It’s Crystal clear that something illegal happened, and he hasn’t explained one bit of it. We know that the “firm” he worked for was a proven illegal Ponzi scheme. Santos claims he didn’t know, but if he didn’t know, why did he assure clients he would increase their investments 10x? Now he’s even been accused by a vet of raising $3,000 for the vet’s dog and keeping all the money for himself. PRETEND THAT WAS A DEMOCRAT.

Do not deflect. Show us the law.