Rebound

Liberal? Trump’s impeachment lawyer is a Harvard professor. They have liberals in fields such as political science and sociology, but do you think their lawyers, business students, scientists and engineers are? What evidence do you have of this? The Washington Post is owned by one of the wealthiest men in America. He has a strongly vested interested in low taxes and maintaining the status quo. Bankers are liberal. Wow. That’s a laugh.

What is liberal about a monarch? It is as conservative as can be. Nothing is more status quo than “I shall own and rule everything because my father did.” You unfortunately just want to make up nonsense definitions.

Putin is not a king and neither was Mao. The leaders of Saudi Arabia and Qatar are kings. Louis XIV was a King.

Of course a King is a right wing dictator. Nobody gets to vote, the king rules and owns all. Hitler called himself socialist but nobody got to vote once he seized power. There was nothing left wing about him; his ideological enemy was the USSR, not the West.

Extreme Left: Stalin and Mao Extreme Right: Hitler, Mussolini, Kings, religious theocracies (Iran)

We’re the people who “did this thing” Republicans or Democrats? They were Republicans. FusionGPS started this work with Republican money, not Democrat money. Then Fusion went o the Democrats, said, “Hey, look at all this work we started, we think we’re onto something, just pay us a little more and we’ll finish it up.” There’s nothing wrong with opposition research. In fact, we needed more of it in Santos’ election.

Left wing ideology is not seen in a poor light. Left wing ideologies are supported by a majority of voters, but right wing ideologies are supported by the oligarch billionaires. Left wing ideologies are overwhelmingly supported by a majority on issues such as gun control, abortion, climate policy, gay rights, religious liberty, and on and on. America’s Republicans represent a minority of Americans and the Democrats represent a majority. Remember that Hillary got millions more votes than Trump and so did Biden. Democrat Congressmen and Senators represent far more people than the Republican Congressmen and Senators represent. These are facts.

No, it’s because Lake has already had a string of court losses and she’s trying to get yet another stupid show trial. The judge, who’s already ruled in her case, said her new trial has limited scope based on her legal arguments. IOW, it’s not a complete new trial, because all that nonsense of hers has already had its day in court. IOW, when you lose in court, you don’t get to go back over and over with the same arguments and the same evidence, hoping for a different outcome. Quoting from your article: ”In the initial December trial that Thompson presided over, and in a February appeal, both courts shot down all of Lake’s claims in her election challenge, ruling they were either improper to bring before the court in such a case or that they were not backed by the facts. The Arizona Supreme Court in March dismissed all of Lake’s claims except for one, regarding signature verification processes, which it sent back to Thompson for review, saying that the judge had improperly dismissed it.” So she gets a two day hearing to present her claims about signature verification. The County insists her claim is untrue and they can prove it in court, so Lake has little chance of prevailing.

I see you’re running with the “plausible deniability” defense.

There is no such correlation, as this report from UCLA law school proves: https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/SORS-LGBTQ-May-2022.pdf

What did Obama tell him to do? Nothing. I don’t know what they were negotiating or discussing, but we could figure it out if we look at what agreements were reached between the US and Russia during Obama’s second term.

The righties are the ones trying to sell the left as “woke.” I get emails from Democrats all the time. They never call themselves woke. Joe Biden is leader of the Democratic Party right now. How many Presidential Pardons has he issued to cronies or Democratic politicians or rioters? ZERO. So yes, of course there are both conservative and liberal extremists. But the Democrats are not embracing the extremists by any means. We have different values, such as environmental protection and higher taxation of higher incomes, just as Republicans Eisenhower and Nixon also had. Today’s tax rates have created an ultra small class of ultra-ultra-rich the likes of which the world has never seen. Russia has their oligarchs and so does America. You talk about wealth redistribution but we have wealth redistribution to the ultra-rich. It doesn’t make our economy any stronger at all.

There is zero difference between extreme right and extreme left, because both are dictatorships.

The purpose of Durham’s investigation was to determine whether the investigation of the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia was appropriate, or whether it was triggered by bogus Intel provided by Trump’s political rival. On this point, Durham is clear: The Crossfire Hurricane investigation began in July, 2016 based on Intel provided by an Australian diplomat, after WikiLeaks exposed Clinton emails which a Trump aide appeared to know of in advance. The Steele dossier did not reach the FBI until mid-September, 2016. THAT is what Durham’s report concluded. Any normal person would have reacted to the WikiLeaks with disgust and would have condemned this illegal theft, yet Trump made himself appear complicit by relishing every leak, thanking WikiLeaks, and encouraging Russia to steal more. So SHUT UP, because those are hard facts. FACTS. Not “connecting dots,” not “Q drops.” FACTS. You hate facts, but those are facts.

Where in the report does it say that Crossfire Hurricane was not justified?

Doesn’t it worry you that Donald Trump exhibits obvious signs of mental instability?

No criminal conduct in conducting the investigation of Donald Trump. The investigation itself lead to discovery of plenty of criminal conduct.

And they’re just picking on poor innocent George Santos, aren’t they? Get this straight: Donald Trump is a criminal. If you don’t want to be investigated for conspiring with Russia, do not… repeat: Do Not ask Russia to hack your political opponent’s email on live TV. Got it? Also, if you want to avoid a grand jury investigation, do not… repeat: Do Not call the Georgia Secretary of State and tell him to “find” 12,000 votes. Also, if you have access to Classified Information… do not take it home, refuse to return it, lie about having it, and then insist that you have an unfettered right to have it. Also, when shopping in department stores, do not rape women in the dressing room. Also, if you are on trial for rape, do not insist under oath that your status as a celebrity gives you the right to grab women’s private parts any time you want. Got it? Can you manage that?

Trump has been convicted twice in a row…

I don’t have any idea what you’re talking about. Meanwhile, Trump is up on multiple Federal and state criminal charges.

That exchange with Obama had nothing to do with asking for favors to win his election.

Like I said, you haven’t read this 316 page report, you don’t know what it says, and no matter what it says nothing will change your mind. You ought to accept the fact that you are utterly brainwashed, because, like I said, NOTHING can change your mind and you know it. 316 pages you haven’t read and you’re trying to tell people what it says. Hallmark of a brainwashed mind.

You are a troll, dude. You said Obama started increasing the deficit his first day in office. He didn’t. Obama inherited an economic recession and bank collapse from Bush, and he turned it around.

It’s a 316 page report and people are claiming to know what it says minutes after it’s released. I conclude, therefore, it has not changed anyone’s mind. No indictments, arrests, or convictions, so it accomplished nothing. Probable cause existed. A hostile foreign government was breaking multiple laws to hack and steal confidential information from a U.S. Presidential candidate in order to support her opponent. There is no question that this is true. Second, the opponent gleefully celebrated this lawlessness AND encouraged more of it. Every decent human in America should have stopped supporting him right then. He was running for office as chief of all law enforcement, while celebrating and encouraging crime. Third, US intelligence already knew there were ties between senior campaign staff and Russian government agents and had even warned some of these staffers to avoid further communications, which they ignored. That is a literal mountain of probable cause that conspiracy was occurring. Not “collusion,” because that’s not what the law is called. That is why Trump kept claiming “no collusion,” it’s because “conspiracy” is the crime, not “collusion.”

I see you clearly only care about a child’s life until he or she is born.