ExFlyer

WOW...once again with nothing LOL LOL LOL Sad little LOSER..HA HA HA Except I am glad I am once again your comrade LOL LOL LOL com·rade: noun: comrade; plural noun: comrades a companion who shares one's activities or is a fellow member of an organization. a friend who is frequently in the company of another synonyms: associate, companion, familiar, fellow. an intimate friend or associate : companion

They may think but we know for a fact you are a LOSER

WOW, you are so full of it. Does it just leak out or do you have to grunt to make it come out? LOL LOL LOL I am sad..... I am not your comrade any more? sniff sniff sniff

Poilievre claims only his party supports working Canadians. However, conservatives have never championed programs like the Canada Child Benefit, Early Learning Child Care, or school nutrition. In contrast, liberals introduced anti-scab legislation (C-58) and doubled the Innovation program to $50 million to support apprenticeships. They also reduced income tax rates from 22% to 20.5% for incomes between $ 70 and $ 120,000. Additionally, a new 33% tax bracket for incomes over $ 200,000.

WOW...did you come up with that all by yourself???? HA HA HA

Probably most things LOL

The federal Liberals are holding 43 per cent of support amongst decided Canadian voters, maintaining a lead over the Conservatives, who dropped two points last month to 36 per cent, according to a new Postmedia-Leger poll. Almost half of Canadians (49 per cent) indicated they are satisfied with Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberal government, Satisfaction with federal opposition leaders remains low, with Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre at 31 per cent, Carney leads as the preferred prime minister amongst 40 per cent of those polled, followed by Poilievre at 28 per cent. https://ca.news.yahoo.com/liberals-maintain-43-per-cent-110049721.html Poilievre claims only his party supports working Canadians. However, conservatives have never championed programs like the Canada Child Benefit, Early Learning Child Care, or school nutrition. In contrast, liberals introduced anti-scab legislation (C-58) and doubled the Innovation program to $50 million to support apprenticeships. They also reduced income tax rates from 22% to 20.5% for incomes between $ 70 and $ 120,000. Additionally, a new 33% tax bracket for incomes over $ 200,000.

Dontcha just hate it when facts slap ya in the face??? LOL LOL LOL Get it right and live with it Don't be like user that gets slapped with facts all the time and hates it so much he gets vindictive HA HA H A

Can't stand the facts eh? Truth is the Swedes named it Grippen.....period!! But hey, ya gotta come to the defence of a LOSER and that only makes you a LOSER too LOL As for electing libs...if the cons had a decent leader, maybe the would be government but..they don't so. you LOSE. Of course you have been there...4 times in a row...showing up at at every election, the cons have shown themselves. Self destructing m0r0ns LOL LOL LOL Your blather is as useless as confux's post HA HA H A

Awww poor baby...feelings hurt I always have time for you LOSER LOL You get what you deserve taxi...keep whining LOL LOL LOL Oh and glad I am your comrade again,thanks com·rade: noun: comrade; plural noun: comrades a companion who shares one's activities or is a fellow member of an organization. a friend who is frequently in the company of another synonyms: associate, companion, familiar, fellow. an intimate friend or associate : companion

Hey LOSER, the name of the aircraft is Gripen. The Swedes named it Gripen. No matter how hard you try to obfuscate...the name is still Gripen ....not griffin or griffen Your post is BS and useless.... as usual. LOL LOSER strikes out again HA HA HA

So, governments have influence but...they do not build. LOL Hey LOSER...PP never did $hit when he was minister and neither did his leader Harper LOL. Don't throw stones in your BS glass house LOL LOSER

I think provincial and federal "red tape" has been all but eliminated. In my area, the municipal "red tape" still exists and the municipality say it is their right. I think the "fees"are for all the infrastructure and forms and permissions for the house. I think if you had to pay it ...you would not be building a house. When PP was a minister....he made promises and did not keep them. Harpers government had a lot to say about housing too but it went nowhere. So, don't throw stones in that glass house.

The federal government (or provincial or municipal government) are not construction companies. At best, governments can predict and hope housing will be built but, unless private contractors and construction companies can see away to make a profit, there will be nothing built. They can allocate funds but someone has to take up the offer.

OK Who is Trudeau?

OK.

BS. Prove it. LOL Updates are not legislation so,np approval is required. "he financial cycle is an annual parliamentary process that facilitates the review, approval, and oversight of government financial priorities, budgetary policies, and public spending." "The federal government of Canada does not have a strict legal requirement to present an annual budget or a specific number of fiscal updates per year,"

Says who?? You??? LOL Updates do not require voting LOL

Just giving you the proper information. You are welcome Nope, makes sense s the budget is for the future year.... " Shift in timing: The federal budget will now be presented in the fall to align with a new budgetary cycle. Capital vs. operational spending: This new cycle will separate capital and operational spending. Capital investments, such as those in housing and infrastructure, will be announced in the fall budget. Day-to-day operational spending, such as transfers, social programs, and government salaries, will be addressed in other reports. Reason for change: This change is intended to provide a clearer picture of fiscal planning and allow the government to address both capital and operational expenditures more strategically. "

Duhhh, the next budget will be next Fall "Canada will now present its federal budget in the fallwith the first one under the new system being Budget 2025 which was tabled on November 4, 2025. This change moves the annual budget from the spring and will be followed by a spring economic and fiscal update. The government states the new timing is to provide more certainty and predictability for planning, particularly for businesses and other levels of government"

Nope Yup. You get what you are worth... LOSER What lie...the quote is directly from you...cannot back out like you always try to do LOSER...you said it HA HA HA You are just sad and upset cause you had to bail out on your hero PP Le Pew by saying "totally and completely defeated and even admit that " I'm not happy with him for other reasons " and " i don't blindly support anyone. I don't pretend the leader of a party i support is perfect just because i support that party." LOL LOL LOL Sad Sad Sad LOSER

Yup. You get what you are worth... LOSER You are just sad and upset cause you had to bail out on your hero PP Le Pew by saying "totally and completely defeated and even admit that " I'm not happy with him for other reasons " and " i don't blindly support anyone. I don't pretend the leader of a party i support is perfect just because i support that party." LOL LOL LOL Sad Sad Sad LOSER Oh and here is something entertaining

Yup. You get what you are worth... LOSER What lie...the quote is directly from you...cannot back out like you always try to do LOSER...you said it HA HA HA You are just sad and upset cause you had to bail out on your hero PP Le Pew by saying "totally and completely defeated and even admit that " I'm not happy with him for other reasons " and " i don't blindly support anyone. I don't pretend the leader of a party i support is perfect just because i support that party." LOL LOL LOL Sad Sad Sad LOSER

Yup...how do ya feel trying to talk with a child??? LOSER HA HA HA Sad sad little LOSER HA HA HA So many retorts and none of any worth. Empty rhetoric except when you finally admitted your failure and defeat when you bailed on your hero PP Le Pew and said "totally and completely defeated and even admit that " I'm not happy with him for other reasons " and " i don't blindly support anyone. I don't pretend the leader of a party i support is perfect just because i support that party." SAD SAD little LOSER

Sad sad little LOSER HA HA HA So many retorts and none of any worth. Empty rhetoric except when you finally admitted your failure and defeat when you bailed on your hero PP Le Pew and said "totally and completely defeated and even admit that " I'm not happy with him for other reasons " and " i don't blindly support anyone. I don't pretend the leader of a party i support is perfect just because i support that party." SAD SAD little LOSER