ExFlyer
Senior Member-
Posts
12,036 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by ExFlyer
-
the federal government provides significant financial support to the provinces and territories for healthcare through a major transfer program called the Canada Health Transfer (CHT). This funding is a cornerstone of Canada's publicly funded healthcare system, which is managed and delivered by the provincial and territorial governments. How Federal Healthcare Funding Works Canada Health Transfer (CHT): This is the largest federal transfer, providing long-term, predictable funding on an equal per capita basis to all provinces and territories. The CHT is projected to be approximately $54.7 billion in 2025-26. Conditions: To receive their full CHT contribution, provinces and territories must adhere to the principles and conditions set out in the Canada Health Act, such as public administration, universality, and accessibility for medically necessary services. Targeted Funding: In addition to the CHT, the federal government provides targeted, time-limited funding through bilateral agreements for specific priority areas, such as mental health and substance use services, home and community care, and reducing surgical backlogs. Overall, federal funding (including the CHT and historical tax point transfers) accounts for approximately one third of all public money provinces and territories spend on healthcare. Provinces and territories generate the remaining 78% of the public cost through their own tax revenues.
-
Look, I have lived in numerous cities in my life. Growing up in Vancouver in the 60's had a problem with homelessness and social issues. I lived in the Comox Valley in the 70+ and htere were many homeless there too, especially in Winter, and housing was very difficult to buy until the government had the AHOP program I lived in Edmonton and there were lots of homeless and housing was unaffordable then when the oil boom crashed it became a buyers market then it went unaffordable again. Plus, there were they years and years of 15+% mortgage rates. Where I live now, housing was a problem, then settled and now it is expensive again...along with the rest of the country. There is no constitutional right to owning a home. "Between 2011 and 2021, the number of renter households grew at more than double the pace of owner households (21.5% versus 8.4%)." "the number of renter households grew at more than double the pace of owner households (21.5% versus 8.4%)." 5 million renter households in 2021, a 21.5% growth since 2011. This means approximately one-third (33.1%) of Canadians were living in rented accommodation in 2021" "In 1986, about four in ten households rented their residence. This decreased to about three in ten households in 2005, but has since risen again" This is not a Liberal or Conservative situation alone , it is the times we were in. Today we have issues as well but...they seem to be cyclical....
-
When will people understand that the feds give money to the provinces and the provides have almost exclusive jurisdiction to the health care systems of this country. And Carney seems to be making inroads on world wide trade. Thing is, trade with nations is not an overnight thing...it is not like buying a car or something and walking out the door with it, it tales time for existing deals to expire or be changed.
-
Bottom line is that Michael Ma was parachuted into the riding and he was what he was at the time of the election and election campaign. It was the conservatives that "planted" him...if that is even the case. Anyway... the conservative outrage over a floor crosser is typical conservative behaviour...if it one of them doing the crossing. It has been sheer praise when a liberal crossed to the conservatives though LOL Also, trying to taint a guy without positive proof is another typical conservative tactic. You folks should be ashamed
-
I do not know what "provoked" the second amendment. The reasons for it is "The Second Amendment was enacted to ensure a well-armed citizenry for common defense, primarily through state militias, to counterbalance potential federal tyranny and protect individual liberty, stemming from colonial experiences with British oppression and suspicion of standing armies. It aimed to preserve the ability for citizens to resist an oppressive government, support the militia, and maintain personal security, reflecting both English common law rights and American Revolutionary War lessons" 'If it was used as intended...there would not be such problems.
-
So, it was OK for him to be a Conservative candidate and elected as a conservative and even goes to Chinese celebrations as a conservative but when he realized the conservative leadership was a joke and moved over...he is a Chinese sympathizer and evil liberal??? Man...you folks are sure hypocritical LOL LOL LOL
-
All you deserve .... Repeat ...Pisses you off eh?? LOL LOL LOL Awww... poor baby Loser still crying about LOSING.. Move on pedophile LOSER HA HA HA Awww now you want the admins to finish what you can easily stop?? Just proving you are LOSING and cannot win. Stop posting to me.... and it will all go away...or like others have told you...put me on ignore. The choice is yours and don't try to get admin help for your failures HA HA HA I only call you a LOSER and pedophile. You, on the other hand, in almost every post to anyone insult, call names and make shit up about them...so, if you are whining to the admins..maybe they should look at your behaviour to all posters LOL LOL LOL
-
So...you are claiming Ma had Chinese connections and you are dissing the libs??? You realize he was conservative party member and elected as a conservative??? Can you be any more hypocritical?? He was great when he was conservative but not when he chose to see the light and move to the liberals??? You are become9ng as much of a LOSER as confuyx LOL
-
Suck it up pedophile buttercup...you LOST, your party was the LOSER..LIKE you are a LOSER LOL LOL LOL On the contrary...Carney is waaaay over PP in favourability but you are right,.. the conservative party and Liberal party are in a virtual tie. Thing is...people vote for the person more than they vote for the party. And PP ius aLOSER...like you LOL
-
OK, Here it is To be hypocritical means acting in a way that contradicts your stated beliefs, morals, or feelings, essentially pretending to have virtues you lack or judging others for things you do yourself, like telling someone to be honest while you are lying. It's a form of hypocrisy where your actions don't match your words, often involving claiming high standards but failing to live up to them. So, a hypocrite is the conservatives cheering when liberals cross the floor but whine and cry and demean a conservation that crosses a floor. LOL Seriously LOSER...you could not figure that out all by yourself?? LOL
