ExFlyer
Senior Member-
Posts
12,037 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by ExFlyer
-
Yes...that is why it was called a "Leadership Review"? Yes, the liberals are happy... I mentioned that before 95%??? "About 675,000 members have signed up to vote for a new leader of the Conservative Party of Canada". Only 3000 were invited fir the review and had to pay $1000 to attend. Who is making a fuss??? Making points is valid and if any points are incorrect, false, or a lie, please correct them. ( I did not write that list...I copy and pasted it) But they did cross the floor...where did anyone say it was a "crisis"?
-
Nope...we are still a gross importer. Over 68% of our food is imported. Oh...you mean the battery plants that you say are manufacturing??? LOL What a LOSER LOL LOL LOL ICE manufacturing???? Oh yeah?? What was it??? LOSER, you makin up shit again as a lying LOSER like you always does HA HA HA The hole you dig with all your lying is getting deeper and deeper ...pedophile LOSER
-
Never done...you never do...we don't expect much truth from a pedophile LOSER like you LOL
-
Of course...which part??? And back up your claims. I won't wait because you will not be back LOL
-
Carney Articulates The New World Order In Davos
ExFlyer replied to Zeitgeist's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
I was part of the Cormorant SAR helicopter procurement project and while it is a great aircraft, it is European and the logistic and maintenance and parts costs are far more than if we would have bought an American made helicopter. Just getting parts and getting parts repaired or overhauled means it takes so much longer and we had to buy triple the spares just to keep the supply chain functioning and have parts available. The work and manufacture and jobs that were supposed to come to Canada never happened (for many reasons, like tooling, production and certification issues as well as cost) so, we are stuck with all support coming from Europe. The fixed wing SAR Kingfisher is turning out to be the same. The OEM's in Europe are just not going to start new factories here just because we bought a few aircraft. The US, while not our best buddy lately, is the highest tech in aviation at this time and the proximity makes it the most economical and logistical sense as well. -
Carney Articulates The New World Order In Davos
ExFlyer replied to Zeitgeist's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Aircraft type Certification is done by every country. Trump does not have the authority or power to de certify aircraft....unless he fire everyone in the FAA. If he de certifies any aircraft, all it means is that that aircraft type will not be able to fly in his country. We are not told to buy the F35. It is the one chose by our Air Force and it's personnel. There are lots of alternatives but.. better ones? The real truth is changing to a different type of fighter would not be feasible form the financial side. To throw away all the infrastructure, training, special tools and test equipment and hangars etc would just not make any sense. Let alone the actual fighting capability and pilot certifications. "so why should we be procuring US aircraft?" because we cannot afford not to. -
Carney Articulates The New World Order In Davos
ExFlyer replied to Zeitgeist's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
What games is Carney playing in the media?? As for the fighters....Canada has been paying into the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program fornearly 30 years, starting in 1997. I am unsure the total but it is 100's of millions we have spent so far. Changing to another aircraft type ss far beyond just the cost of the aircraft. Logistics and personnel and facilities far outweigh the price of the aircraft by times 10 or more. -
There were about 2500 people....is that 95% of the conservative members?? The Conservatives are celebrating Pierre Poilievre’s 87.4% “victory” like they just won the Stanley Cup. But here’s the part they don’t want you to know: This wasn’t an election. This was a confidence review run by party HQ. It wasn’t voted on by: • The public • Conservative voters • Or even the full CPC membership It was voted on by a small, tightly controlled group of registered party members approved by headquarters, the safest possible electorate. That’s not democracy. That’s a corporate board keeping their CEO. If Poilievre had lost: → THEN it would have gone to a real leadership election → THEN members would vote → THEN Canadians would see real competition But he didn’t face that. So no, he didn’t “win.” He was allowed to stay. That’s not a victory. That’s a boss not getting fired. This is the same guy who: • Blew a can’t-lose election • Lost his own seat • Drove MPs out of caucus • Became so toxic his party locked down the voting process And now the Conservatives are throwing confetti because he survived internal HR paperwork. That’s not leadership. That’s tenure. Pierre Poilievre wasn’t elected. He was selected. And every MP who quietly crosses the floor knows exactly what this “win” really means.
-
Got 87% of the vote. https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/conservative-delegates-vote-on-poilievres-leadership Good news for the Liberals LOL
-
And so have all the other minor parties leaders. Be real...there are only 2 parties in Canada liberal and conservative (whatever goes on in quebec being "distinct" LOL) The media does not carry any votes...the voting Canadians do. Canadians liked Mulroney.... till the end. Prove it LOSER!!! LOL LOL LOL
-
Well, ya shoulda voted the conservatives in but....you did not have a leader that Canadians could back so, they voted for the ones Canadians decide would be best. If PP get support at his review...he can be the only leader to have lost 3 straight elections. Canadians do not like him.
-
No he did not...he said federal restrictions would be lifted. He has no authority over the provinces...even a LOSER like you should know that LOL Yes...they were even talking this week while they are in Ottawa. They have had premiers meeting in the past too. Again...get informed LOL https://www.pm.gc.ca/en/news/statements/2026/01/29/first-ministers-joint-statement He never lied...he only said federal obstacles will be removed...that is all he can do. You are certainly misinformed and foolish..a trait of a LOSER LOL
-
I guess now that you explain it but, it had me guessing when I first read it.
-
Are Alberta Separatists Committing Treason?
ExFlyer replied to TreeBeard's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
I agree. Both Alberta and Quebec are not thinking the whole thing through. We, conservative and liberals governments alike, gave Quebec disproportionate influence and neither party benefits from it LOL -
He did not say he would fix it anyway. All he could do and he did was eliminate any federal issues and regulations. Yes, there were federal barriers but now they are gone. Yes, he said he will get them talking and they did. And he is working with them but....the provinces have a lot of their pwn issues, rules and regulations that only they can deal with. So now it is wholly in the hands of the provinces. Sorry for your stupidity about this situation.
-
Are Alberta Separatists Committing Treason?
ExFlyer replied to TreeBeard's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Not quite correct. They were a colony of France and lost the battles and rights to any claims to the British. Quebec only became a "formally recognized by the Canadian House of Commons as a "distinct society" in November 1995, following the narrow 1995 referendum result. While rooted in earlier constitutional debates like the 1987 Meech Lake Accord, this parliamentary recognition formally acknowledged Quebec's French-speaking majority, unique culture, and civil law tradition. -
CBC edits out embarrassing Carney footage
ExFlyer replied to CdnFox's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Nope...they are all quotes from your posts...read em and weep. They can look them up and see what you have become....a total degenerate clown. People here now see how low a degenerate like you really has become. You should quit before you descend lower...if that is even possible you necrophiliac pedophile LOSER. -
CBC edits out embarrassing Carney footage
ExFlyer replied to CdnFox's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Nope it is you that is a necrophiliac...you keep invoking my dead mother and father.... and now you invoke dead children sexually??? Wow...you have really sunk lower than the low You are definitely a necrophiliac pedophile and prove it now LOSER ...I cannot even LOL because you are such a degenerate. -
CBC edits out embarrassing Carney footage
ExFlyer replied to CdnFox's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Look, you posted: "Pedophile? Somone's having their period." ... " and then you posted to me "Invoking your dead parents? I think you got the wrong guy Sweetie. " To which I responded to you ":Clearly you are someone that has no idea of what he is continuously posting....calling me a kid, teeneager and then invoking my dead parents".. I responded that confux was posting the stuff. So, I gave you the reasons why I called him pedophile and more. I never once said it was you...just answering your query. -
Poilievre's political future on the line tonight
ExFlyer replied to Barquentine's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
If he remains leader, he can be the first and only leader ever to lose the elections 3 times...LOL Mark Carney (Liberal): Leads with approximately 48% to 53% support in preferred Prime Minister polling. His popularity is bolstered by his perceived ability to handle international trade tensions and the economy. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative): Polling between 25% and 28% for best Prime Minister. While his personal numbers trail Carney's, he remains the dominant choice among younger voters and in the Prairies.
