ExFlyer

As you know, the house has been a money pit and in desperate condition for decades. JT does not own it. No PM owns it. It belongs to, ready for it, the NCC, the National Capital Commission, which is you, with members for every province. They have not made decisions. As you say "You don't get a free pass because the last PM did not fix it.." and that include every PM since the 50's. If you are going to judge, then you need to judge every PM since the 50's. Fact is a bureaucracy has let this house become shambles. A bureaucracy that every PM has had to deal with. The same NCC that want to shut down Wellington Street in Ottawa. The same bureaucracy that shut down the Queen Eizabeth parkway to cars so local residents cannot get home but the few bicycles on sundys can ride on it. Bottom line is JT cannot do anything abut it just as previous PMS could not do anything about it. Don't make this a liberal political thing, it is a Canadian NCC problem. Oh and, I live in Ottawa and think the NCC is a waste of office space. Lots of people (political appointees) making lots of money but not doing a damn thing.

You lying sack of crap!!!! You embarrass everyone that has ever served. Not just a loser but a lying SOB loser.

Loser, calling your regimental heroes murderers. Bet your RSM and all members are proud of you... NOT!!!!!

Yes, and cost of living is lower. Not denying big cities have more stuff, that is what I am saying. The study was the one that did not use people from the cities.

FO you loser. Now calling all your colleagues murders. How low can you get????

We are talking about a house , that the present PM refused to move into. The many decades of neglects form every PM, liberal and conservative, has led to this state of disrepair. JT is not to blame, he just inherited the crappy house (from Harper LOL) and refused to move in.

He was drugged by his own self worth as you are. I have done nothing to beg forgiveness for. You on the other hand idolizing torturers and murderers and pretending to be christian, well, Beelzebub and Mephistopheles is awaiting your arrival. Losers and heretics and hypocrites accepted by them with open arms. Go away loser.

Free and availability is the key. Bigger cities have more of both. The reason you see more homeless in Seattle than in Bottineau ND or Hope BC is because there is more stuff. Never said anything about morally superior, that is your claim.

You are incorrect, no one assumes that at all because the article makes it clear it is not the case. One poster even stated his reasons for homelessness. There was no misunderstanding and the article was quite clear. They did not say, in the survey that it was not downtown Vancouvers homeless. I think you are reading more into the article than is really there. You sound like you are making for excuses for something. It said "recipients spent 99 fewer days homeless, and spent 55 more days in stable housing. ". There were only 50 people from outside the big city and they spent 99 fewer days in shelters... that is 2 days less for the 50 people. 55 days in stable housing...that is only one night for the 50 people.. So, what does "progressive mean when it comes to homelessness? Regardless of where it is? Does progressive mean getting things free??

As the article said, they did not use Vancouver folks for the study because "because researchers were seeking a "representative voice" in North America, and Zhao said "people in Vancouver are more progressive than an average person in North America."" Moer progressive?? What does that mean other than free shoot up zones and free drugs??

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/happens-50-homeless-people-7-080000736.html "Instead of blowing the windfall on "temptation goods", such as alcohol, drugs or cigarettes, they spent it on rent, clothing and food, the study led by University of British Columbia researcher Jiaying Zhao found." But then goes on to say "found recipients spent 99 fewer days homeless, and spent 55 more days in stable housing. They also retained $1,160 more savings." meanign that they spent all the money and spent 2 less days each in a shelter. "the study did not include people with severe substance or alcohol use or mental health symptoms." What a useless study and waste of money.

Learn to read, you loser. It is story about a new virulent strain of the SARS-CoV-2 virus intermixed with opinions by godess. Nothing about the blather vomiting out of your mouth. Read the story, not the opinions, especially yours. Loser

The topic is about the Pirola Variant, a new virulent strain, not about your past paranoia. Get with the program...and I know that is difficult for you that lives in only the past.

You have become far more than just a hypocritical christian. You at first worshipped and idolize torturers and murderers and now have a wish death upon the aged. And now you demeaned,belittled and make fun of people that have survived cancer. You are not even close to being a christian, you are hiding behind the cloth. A disgraced christian. You are an embarrassment to the Canadian Military and for sure disrespectful to all your senior and retired members of your regiment. You had very little credibility previously with your inane blather but now you lost all credibility with your disrespect and death wish towards senior society including those seniors retired form the military and within your own regiment. Yup, you are a special kind of A hole.

Just proves the point that you are a special kind of disrespectful a$$hole. A total zero.

Colorectal and very low in the tract. 4 years ago. 2 months of Chemo, 36 radiation treatments, surgery, 2 more months of chemo (pills this time) and colostomy bag for 1 year. Immune system very compromised and on medications but cannot take chances. I am a cancer survivor and am very happy about that

Don't know but am sure paying attention.

I, personally, am glad they are coming up with a vaccine for this. Yes, I have a "fear trigger". As a cancer survivor with a permanently damaged immune system, I will be first in line for the vaccine. And the flu vaccine as well.

Per capita in this case is meaningless. It is easy to lessen output per capita if you have several billion people. I am sure Monaco, the country of luxury cars and no industry is higher than Canada and China too.

OK, you win, yours is more minuscule than mine LOL Yes, minuscule. Compared to provincial income tax, federal income tax, property tax, all the other sales and whatever taxes and on and on and on. Folks, we are taxed...like it or not,... think it explains inflation...NOT!!!

Fuel taxes have always been there.The only extra is the carbon tax. Give it up, as much as you want to believe carbon taxes are the problem ,and you can if you want to, it is actually minuscule and not the issue. Imports do not pay carbon tax.

Minuscule = "14 cents per litre to the price of gasoline and 12 cents per cubic metre of natural gas"

As I said and will continue to say, "Considering that carbon tax is such a minuscule part of all the taxes we pay, your point is lost in the noise" If the carbon tax is so stifling for you, buy an electric car

Yup but they were out and out fights... No sarcasm at all Obfuscation.? As you are now?? LOL Mellow out , it is too early to get wound up.

Considering that carbon tax is such a minuscule part of all the taxes we pay, your point is lost in the noise LOL Look at your fruits and vegetables from out of country. Look at food from within Canada. Look at wages in Canada compared to other countries (from which we get most of our products). Kinda makes the pittance of the carbon tax disappear.