ExFlyer

Not going to argue with you or play word games. My points were and are valid.

1. I was not "singling out", I was making observable comment. 2. We don't keep good statistics in Canada but about 40% of indigenous kids live with single parent. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/as-sa/98-200-x/2016020/98-200-x2016020-eng.cfm The US keeps better stats and up to 66% black kids live in single parent situations https://datacenter.aecf.org/data/tables/107-children-in-single-parent-families-by-race-and-ethnicity#detailed/1/any/false/2048,1729,37,871,870,573,869,36,868,867/10,11,9,12,1,185,13/432,431 Ha Ha Ha...me too then LOL

1.Your comment "Are you one of these eugenics people who wants to deny parents the right to procreate based on race and or income? " is more a comment than a question. If it is supposed to be a question, then it is backhanded. 2. 3. I am hardly "aghast", I was stating the obvious. Black (in the US) and indigenous (here in Canada) are the ones that foster the most single parent issues. D9d not once mention financial status, that is you trying to put the blame on money. Successful?? Now that is a comedic comment LOL Don't do darts.

His question was valid. Your response is uncalled for. There are many wealthy non caucasian fathers that boinked and left the mothers. Fact is, the black and indigenous males are the majority of the problem (with permission of their women of course)

I choose to understand but cannot read minds or intent. Clarity is not a aptitude you demonstrate

As usual....your comment makes no sense.

Well, I do think that governments, any government cannot do anything about society sexual activity. I do suggest governments cannot do anything.

There is no way any political action will resolve this. The affected communities need to correct themselves, that is the only way. No amnount of influencers, no amount of community leaders, no amount of activists are going to change attitudes towards lifestyles. Am I negative about this? Yes. While we have these problems in Canada, the US is clearly the leaders in this societal problem and they have not been able to curtail or change it.

Who said it was not happening?? The "scared straight" strategy has not worked so what makes you think it will work in schools? Single mothers are not making their daughters think about the consequences and no one is going to say or do anything about guys looking for and getting some booty. We already have social workers, community leaders et al and nothing changes. The whole thing seems ingrained in their culture. My point was no government of any party has done anything.

I disagree. Social norms have not been adjusted in that in my lifetime (which is quite long LOL) the segment of society we are talking about has not improved, changed or gotten better. If anything, single parenthood in the black and indigenous community has gotten far worse. In the indigenous community, parenting by grandparents has been the norm for many many decades. Again, by saying "liberal minded compatriots" you are making this a political thing and but is not. Conservative governments, federal and provincial have also done nothing. Really, what can any government do about the sexual activity of any segment of society.

I am talking about a segment of society where men still enslave or use women and keep women subservient. I hate to say it but that is the black and indigenous society. Blacks around the world men use as sex toys and move on and as we can see with our indigenous, single mothers are not an unusual occurrence. Be they black women in Africa or inner city New York, they get boinked and the guys move on to the next. I blame not just the men but the women too.

Stop making this a political thing. It is pure societal. The black and indigenous women are the subservient to their men. They do what they are told and hence, become sexual outlets and the men walk away. There is no normalization of divorce as there is no marriage, just sex. Nothing to do with political parties as in the US, both have in power and nothing has changed under each of them, just like here in Canada, no political party has done a thing to change this.

Not sure what you are disagreeing with. The report is about single moms and fatherless. Not 2 women raising kids. The report is very American. The American societal issue is basically a black problem. If we suffer the same issues it will be primarily in the indigenous communities. A societal issue.

Naww, just not a hockey fan LOL

Who is Don Cherry and why is he important enough to quote?

WTF???? LOL

I am very aware of how farms and property ownership work. You farm it or you sell your land...end of story. Zoned as greenbelt by legislation, not by municipal zoning bylaws. Yes, they can sell but... Who would buy worthless land I have played enough with you. Bye.

You insult everyone all the time under the auspices of some religious drivel. If you do not agree or like something you damn them with bible quotes. Harassment by your constant biblical damnation is a violation of BC Human Rights Code as well. No one should be subjected to constant preaching LOL This post should be in the proper forum, otherwise you are harassing us with your precept.

You are aware this is a national forum, not just BC? BC rights mean nothing outside of BC. You insult people all the time, telling them they will go to hell or suffer the wrath of you imaginary saviour. Your constant preaching is as threatening as what you are whining about Lastly, this is not a Federal Politics issue, this should be in the Suggestions forum.

That is not a fact, that is your opinion, your very own rectal pluck. LOL Making your property into greenbelt property and unsellable or for only specific use is expropriation, now, that is a fact. And yes, they give up their right to sell to whomever they want without compensation.

Nope, only a fool keeps on keeping on when they know they are on a treadmill. LOL Actually, I do like seeing you make more and more of a fool out of yourself so.....you can keep replying Oh wait....did I say that already?? LOL Oh, did I say that again??? Now it is me expecting different results saying the same thing repeatedly but hey....look who I am saying it too LOL Please get well from your paranoia. Your shrink has more work to do

Facts? What facts? I do not want to cut down trees. Where and when did I say that? I did say, if you want trees to hug, go to any of the municipal, provincial pr federal parks, not some expropriated land from a farmer or other. If the land is tagged greenbelt, the owner cannot do anything with it and if he is too old to farm and no one wants to buy it (at reduced value) to farm then it sits unused and just as if expropriated. Meth labs.....Oh and in some places, the government is giving away illicit drugs..... and I am pretty sure they are not buying it form the cartel LOL You would singing a different tune if they said you have to give up some of your property with no compensation and it was only going to stay empty

Nope, only a fool keeps on keeping on when they know they are on a treadmill. LOL Actually, I do like seeing you make more and more of a fool out of yourself so.....you can keep replying Oh wait....did I say that already?? LOL

Nope, only a fool keeps on keeping on when they know they are on a treadmill. LOL Actually, I do like seeing you make more and more of a fool out of yourself so.....you can keep replying

Look, babble as you want, the point is that a farmer that has had his farm encased into the greenbelt has all his livelihood and money sunk into an almost expropriation situation. He worked for it and his land value is his pension and now it is not. Who buys farms nowadays? Oh wait, no one except big conglomerates and they know they can get it for a steal if it is stuck in a greenbelt. The farmers and landowners stuck in greenbelts are screwed. I have made my point and stand by it and you city dwelling geeks that like to look at trees once a year or so have no stake in it at all.