ExFlyer

Your crystal ball says so? LOL I don't make Bank of Canada predictions which you seem to be able to,... so, the stupid is certainly not me. So, There is no need to keep repeating yourself, I ignored you the first time

A mid term poll and a explanation of that poll is still a mid term rectal pluck, no matter how hard you try an defend it LOLK

Key is...he did not. Wait till December then to make your next prognostication....

Not so obvious to the uber EV proponents.

Poor prognostication. And...interest rates remained the same.

Didn't say that. I saud "While the poll shows Conservatives over Liberals, 61% are not in favour of conservatives. " The fact that your poll required a second poll to explain the first, makes me question booth polls. I am not mssing facts. A poll 2 years away form elections is not even worth the coloured lines in it. The fact another poll had to added to explain the first one makes me question the validity of both. Well, 61% said they would not vote conservative...that is in your post, add up the totals for the other parties and it comes up to 61%. Yes, I have an opinion, as you do. Does not make mine any worse or better than yours. You have equally as might right to be wrong. Sometimes you need the keep your political leaning behind the zipper in your pants

There ya go again. Can't take a varying opinion of your post. So be it. Soon as another view to yours is presented, you go into full shit slinging mode....again. May not have but yet, you posted another poll that explains the first. Yup, back to same old same old from you.

Please don't start. I will not play. When you post a poll and that poll has a codicil to explain the poll, something does not smell right LOL

It is your poll post. The numbers for conservatives is 39% and the rest are not for conservatives. If a poll (or post) requires a codicil, maybe it is not worth much in the first pace??:)

Yup, I can do the math. But, not all are for PP either. Only 39% But as Michael Hardner said "39% is a lot, enough for a majority in our system." You are right, the poll does not ask "who is not in favour" of PP, but, it does demonstrate it just by publishing the numbers that most do not. More people in Canada are not for PP than are.

While the poll shows Conservatives over Liberals, 61% are not in favour of conservatives.

As was said when they had the referendum to separate, it was a good thing the rest of Canada never got to vote cause they would have easily had enough votes to separate LOL The Newfies wanted them to separate, they would have been 2 1/2 hours closer to Toronto :)

I always felt Quebecers were ignorant but, they know they got us by the balls. They never had political power, they have fluer des lis...French power. They get what the want, when they want it and demand more. The do what they want, when they want and damn Canada.

Nope, not at this stage of Canadian development. If we get more seats in Canada, Quebec will still get another. They were initially guaranteed 25% and while they are below that now, they will get it back. They went from 65 waaaay back to 78 now. There was no need to "count" seats for the election win, Quebec still has the seats and do what they want. Didn't the NDP take them from Harper?? Anyway, no chance in hell that Quebec will allow it to be less than what they have now and, if the rest of the country gets more, Quebec will get some too.. Quebec is untouchable.

No, Quebec is guaranteed never to lose any seats https://www.sqrc.gouv.qc.ca/relations-canadiennes/institutions-constitution/place-qc/chambre-communes-en.asp You know there is not a leader in Canada that would threaten Quebec on anything LOL Quebec is more sacred in Canada than a cow in India

Quebec will never lose seats. It is guaranteed 78 seats no matter what. https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/liberals-table-bill-to-protect-number-of-quebec-seats-in-parliament-a-condition-of-deal-with-ndp https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-feds-to-protect-number-of-quebecs-commons-seats-stop-province-losing/

Ontario needs to invest in Electricty Generation as a realistic Option. Before it can do anything. it is not Ontario alone. If Canada is going to wean off fossil fuel, it needs gazzilion dollars worth of new electric power plants.

Back to topic "NDP to back Conservative motion calling for carbon tax pause on all home heating fuels" Parliamentarians had an opportunity to do something but, as usual, the Bloc, the Quebecers decided they want diddly to do with Canada and not play with the grown ups.

Nope. No facts just hearsay and rhetoric from you. No temper to lose. "Once again, give them all the weapons they want and let them wipe each other off the face of the earth. "

Very true. No more FBI-scam October surprises, no truckloads of all-Dem ballots arriving a day late, no more weaponizing the FBI . You do realize we are in Canada? The US may have become the biggest joke but, conservatives are everywhere LOL

As you have with most people LOL

So, your question "Does Canada's government and people respect human life as they should?" is moot as best and stupid as usual.. As you say "Everyone has free will" LOL

In the parking lot?? Circumstantial evidence?? How do they inform considering they knocked out all electricity and water and infrastructure. Did they walk in and pass out notes to where the next bomb or rocket will be dropped? Give up trying to make me see things your way. Go stroke others of your ilk till you ejaculate, you will get more satisfaction LOL Once again, give them all the weapons they want and let them wipe each other off the face of the earth.

The US has already asked them to pause.... no joy There is no "documented proof of bunkers, war rooms and images proving some of their highly critized bombings were justified." that has been seen. Why ask me, it ain't my war or issue and like I have said before, give em both as many weapons as they want and let them wipe each other out. The "obtuse" amounts of civilian deaths is undefendable, no matter how right you think they are.

Nope, wrong again...I don't need vindication or validation, just stating facts.