ExFlyer

herbie, bottom ine is someone has to pay for all your wishes. If they cannot pay for th oil from Saudi now to heat their homes, how are they going to pay for LNG that comes through the Panama Canal and requires the entire province and homes to be converted to LNG? My posts are about economic, physical and structural reality, yours is some sort of imaginary wish.

herbie....you are lost in your own argument. Your opening post on why "Natural gas should be a public resource again" is "Can't afford steak now so how can I eat meat loaf when you can't do it on a stick over an open fire? " and it has not gotten any clearer since. LOL

How many of those "Albertans" working in the oil fields making all that money are actually fromm Alberta? Most are transients coming from other parts of Canada and work in Alberta but go home after shift LOL

I am glad you agree with me

Seems I did say "The feds do not get any royalties from resources. " And taxes are something that is a given...everyone pays LOL Sorry, no brain fart from you LOL

The family of Osama bin Laden denounced Dad so they could move to Canada and collect welfare. Maybe Sheik Hassan Yousef did not tell his kid he would not inherit any money or power so the kid left? LOL Every organization, group, revolution has it's dissenters. Sooner or later all leaders lose their followers.

Monopolies?? The discussion is shipping LNG to the east coast. And then what would the infrastructure change cost users. Competition? In natural resources? In LNG? Are you aware of the topic? LOL

Nice try LOL Got no good argument so a down vote is all ya got LOL Sign of a loser. ?

Yeah, OK. Straight/Gay exactly the same as a war where tens of thousands died and tens of thousands of buildings and hospitals and schools etc are destroyed. What the F is wrong with you???

You know that a camel is a horse designed by committee. Peer review will just see some think one way and others think another. Look at the peer review regarding climate change...

Yeah sure. A supposition. Point and fact is, there are support demonstrations for one side but none for the other. Make all the guesses you want. As opposed to the other side capturing thousands and killing tens of thousands? Both sides are playing the game. Oh and, why are the Israelis being held are called hostages whereas the ones Israel has are called prisoners? Both are women and children too.

You are sorely ignorant of the legal process. Like I said before, the supreme court is not like re-politic forum where just any old rectal pluck is OK.

Where does it or he or anyone say anything about Canada demanding carbon tax in the free trade agreement?? I think you are making stuff up or insinuating that there is carbon tax riders in the agreement.

I read Bill C-57 regarding the free trade agreement with Ukraine (and tears came to my eyes from boring reading). There is no mention of carbon tax in the document. "Poilievre said that Conservatives would remove any reference to the carbon tax in the Canada-Ukraine free trade" would be an easy task as there is nothing to do. LOL https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/bill/C-57/first-reading Now, Bill C-57 is much more than just the free trade agreement and it seems PP may be mixing up his comments? "Bill C-57, An Act to amend the Federal Sustainable Development Act, was introduced in the House of Commons on 19 June 2017 by the Honourable Catherine McKenna, Minister of Environment and Climate Change. It amends the Federal Sustainable Development Act to broaden its scope, to make the process for developing the federal sustainable development strategy more transparent, and to increase accountability to Parliament. The bill also removes the requirement for performance-based contracts with the Government of Canada to include provisions for meeting the applicable targets contained in the federal sustainable development strategy and departmental sustainable development strategies” https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/9.853849/publication.html

Deflecting, as you are doing now and PP did then LOL

Interesting to note though is that there are support Palestine and Palestinian rallys and demonstrations around the world and no or very few small support for Israel rallys. Not picking sides, just making observational comment

Yes but the reporter just used a figure of speech used by everyone. PP deflected....didn't answer, although he knew full well what he was being asked.....period

So rather than trying to answer the intent of the quest, just deflect LOL

Interesting that there are world wide support rallys and demonstrations for support of Palestine and Palestinians and none that support Israel?

Considering it is politicians that make the laws including the constitution and charter, you cannot remover them from the equation. As for picking a judge : https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2018/09/14/how-canada-supreme-court-justices The Bisonette decision was based on the charter and can be appealed if there is enough cause. The decision is not singular, no one judge makes the judgment. There are 9 judges and majority decides.

There you go again. Any moral judgment is up to that persons own perspective. It has diddly shit to do with the friggen bible or any other book for that matter.

As much as you like to think that, when a judge makes a judgment, they have to have the evidence, documents and precedence to make that judgment. A court is not like repolitics where rectal plucks rule LOL

Oh herbie....resort to nonsense when you do not have a good argument. Fact is, you cannot snap your fingers and make it happen. It costs a lot and the users always have to pay.

How can a judge not be political as it is politicians that passed the charter of rights and all laws in Canada and they just rule on them.. The charter and laws are all politics. You don't need to be elected to know that or to rule on that. So, judges do not "make government decisions" they just ensure the laws before them meet what the politicians have written. When fault is found in the written llw, they strike it down and politicians have to re-write them or.....leave them as they are and not enforcable.

herbie...if you don't have the money to pay for oil now, how are you going to pay for the LNG and change to the infrastructure? And how do you know LNG will be cheaper than oil. And, it all comes down to dollars and sense and sense is what you are lacking. LOL It is always easy for you to spend someone elses money LOL