Jump to content

ExFlyer

Senior Member
  • Posts

    12,098
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by ExFlyer

  1. Nope, I imagine they can do what they want. Live in a tipi (spelling make you happy LOL) or build and maintain their own house with money they made and paid taxes on. Huh? but they will have to follow the laws too... as they are enforced to other Canadians. No special terms or conditions or dispositions. Off the teat on on their own....
  2. I claim nothing except I have had a high level security clearance in the Military and in Public Works. I know what I signed and I know what can and cannot be discussed form security briefings. You do not have to believe me as it matters not to me. If PP want to criticize, he should know what he is talking about otherwise is is. just blowing unsubstantiated smoke. If he is not concerned what his members are involved with, well, the consequences can be devastating. As on wise person said, ignorance is no excuse and is the fault of the ignorant. And I agree. "There's not much more point discussing this." Have a good day. I
  3. Actually, you have no idea what they have said and with what clearance is. You are making assumptions without any direct knowledge. "The Secret classification level "shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause serious damage to the national security." I have had top secret clearance and I have had to take action as a result of the briefings I have received. I am fully aware of the restrictions and constraints that come with the clearances. and the key is to do what needs to be done with that knowledge without compromising the clearance or information received at the briefings. I do not have to tell the persons where I got the info to discipline the personnel or to elaborate on it. A person with clearance can most certainly discuss what was briefed, but they need to be careful of the information being passed. Not every word or sentence is secret, but the principal and some of the information is. I think your knowledge of security clearances is limited. Bottom line, if you were a party member, MP or potential candidate, would you like your name smeared in the press even if it was released by Trudeau or PP or jagmeet? How would you k]like it if it came ou tag=fter you were seated in your parliamentary seat? The accusation alone blows your credibility out of the water. Would you not want to know now if you were implicated? Should you leader not know now if you were? And yes, it is an issue... you want this ot linger or clear it up soonest?? It is PP that has the key to close it or let it linger.
  4. Au Contraire, he can do something about it. There are many things that can be done for classified reasons but , he has no reason because he does not know, and chooses not to know. You know this from your security cleared times. I have had to take action to personnel as a result of security briefings. What is BS excuse? That no government has done anything? That is not an excuse, that is a fact. We may have nothig to offer but, we seem to want to be involved and are upset when shunned and not included. How long have we wanted desperately to be on the UN security council and denied? How pissed was government when excluded from the ANZUS Treaty. I agree, we are totally untrustworthy.
  5. The NDP or Greens or Bloc do not have members involved. They cannot name names. Rest assured they will jump on. bandwagon of accusations when PP wins. The inference is that conservatives are implicated. PP should know who they are before he anoints or appoints or allows them to be involved in the election, let alone get elected. Surely he does not want to start his government with a.foreign involvement scandal? Look, pooping on this government is fruitless Other governments have also had many years of inaction. That argument is nonsensical. Yup, we, Canadians. chose to be so open that other countries do not trust us to keep secrets, even if it impacts ourselves, let alone the other nations. You as ex militarily must understand what the consequences of openness can mean to security and especially to plans and combat. While we are not in combat situations, other countries are and they cannot afford to tell Canada anything less it jeopardizes their positions or personnel. Unfortunately, I fully have to agree with your sarcasm.
  6. How can Polievre say anythign or believe anything when he will not get a security clearance? He is only speaking on what he reads in the newspapers or opinion pieces. If he had gfcts , which he chose not to get, it may be different. What will he say or do when he has to get cleared and knows actual facts??. Spending on security and Military has been a disgrace for decades No one government is better than the other in this regard. As for secutrity, it is well known Canad is not a good security partner, we are too gving when someone asks questions so we cannot be trusted to keep secrets.
  7. I did a lot of business in the Maritimes. New Brunswick is very francophone but PEI, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland not so. I think they would vote Quebec out. In Ontario, there is a lot of french along the. Ontario/Quebec border but the rest of Ontario is fed up with Quebec wants and desires and power.
  8. Ohhh poor puppy....losers can only lose more and more and your loser bucket must be filling up LOL I am far from racist... I deal in facts and you have none LOL
  9. I can write and mean exactly what I write. Seems you cannot read it LOL Even you say"One definite downside has been the proliferation of Nazi losers on the internet. " but yoiu don t have to be so self deprecating LOL You loser LOL
  10. Blackbud is a blind individual. He cannot be made to see reason, let alone that there are other religions or people or societies or countries that do not see his way. He actually turns people off his christian ways. He is a bible thumpin fanatic LOL
  11. The women of Iran should be supported by the men of Iran....sounds like an internal problem and we, Canada. should not interfere.
  12. And if we don't trust the experts, whp do we trust? Facebook? Fox News, or even worse, you?? LOL
  13. Dude, I told you once before that you should quit before the hole you dig gets too deep. You must have noticed by now others see through your BS. and feebleness . Your attempts at retort only reinforce you are a loser. LOL
  14. Hey loser...is that all ya got? Correcting spelling??? LOL I spell teepee as I want...you no like, rough a$$ LOL You are being laughed at by all. You are still a major league loser LOL
  15. I cannot hear you when youi speak from from inside your teepee LOL Losers a e losers are losers and you are a loser.....whatever LOL
  16. Once again...you lose. Once a loser always a loser especially with a losing cause LOL
  17. Wrong...again. The discussion was about you... you claim you are not indigenous and then say "we"....you want it to be about Canada, be clear LOL If your posts cannot be. understood or clear, that is on you LOL Take it easy puppy, do not assign your failings to someone else LOL.
  18. Nope...reading comprehension is clearly an issue with you LOL You claim not to be indigenous yet you say "we"...implying if you are LOL And if "we" implies Canadian taxpayers, well, that is my issue with this stuff. There is no, and should never be, an endless for as long as the earth survives deal with anyone. All deals have endings and the indigenous welfare society time has or should come to an end.
  19. "Lightning was witnessed at the time the fires were reported. An investigation by the Canadian Forest Service confirmed the fires were started by lightning. " "Wildfires are sometimes caused by people who leave campfires unattended, burn debris or dispose of lit cigarettes or matches carelessly, or set fires deliberately, while the remaining fires are started by lightning strikes" Are you saying eliminating the carbon tax will enhance lightning strikes or make people stop setting them?
  20. Hey puppy...never said you were....any time or any place Just said you , in another thread, defend the indigenous and say to support them and we, the taxpayer, be responsible for them and in this thread you tell someone to take responsibility for themselves. You are a major league phony dick LOL
  21. Ha Ha Ha...don't like it eh??? Give me a downvote Ha Ha Ha Thing is dude, ya cannot say take responsibility for yourself out of one side of your mouth and then cry if someone tells you to do it too LOL
  22. Just as the indigenous should LOL
  23. This is not anti male or pro feminism...it is equality at its end.. My Dad was real happy when equality was decided upon. He said Mom used to be the Boss and now we are equal...it is a huge promotion for me LOL This topic is not about what proffesion, it is about how much smarter women are than men LOL
×
×
  • Create New...