Legato

What make is your van? Is it standard issue? Does it come with the hypocrisy upgrade?

So you want the CBC, CTV, etc kicked out of the press pool? Or are you quite happy with double standards?

Pedantic.

You do? I think you will be sorry when reality grips back.

More balderdash. It's bad grammar and incorrect to use the words "journalism" and "CBC" as references to each other in the same sentence. Then you further sully the context by using the phrase "real journalists".

Bothonthelimit. First politically motivated and now the the second politically motivated. Tit for Tat The end.

The difference is none, zero (not the warplane), zilch, nought, naught (for our southern neighbors) nothing, cipher, nil, 0, null character, Oddjobs bowler.

This is an opinion and analysis article, and the views expressed by the author or authors are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

What a load of cobblers.

Yes or maybe, oh no, wait a minute, lets bring back the guillotine.

What a load of cobblers. I'm a lefty and don't like anything vaguely right and my feelings make me call people derogatory names. I really don't have a cogent argument so lets call everything Trumpy.

Well we do know you bumbles have hissy fits when its's used against.

Her job against Trump was pretty good, after all she had lots of practice. Unfortunately practice does not always mean perfect. You Democrat's pulled down the statue of limitations, now you want to rebuild it.

Come back when your better, honey and lemon help cure nitpicking.

What a hypocritical POV. If the current government was conservative you would be the one screaming the loudest.

So you don't watch Fox news. In that case your fructooligosaccharides comments are done with a blind allegiance to the lies of the MSM.

That was the sole purpose of the OP.

The federal court squashed the ben in November 22. So you would like to continue using these