Infidel Dog

Does anybody have anything like real evidence to challenge the claim Trump's YouTube channel is making here. Notice I said "real evidence." Believe it or not the fact you or somebody you know of challenges the evidence on the grounds he or she or you doesn't like Trump will not qualify as "real evidence. The claim is "The FBI has an active criminal investigation into the Biden family"

BabyMetal does an homage to their dead guitarist. Yukio something or other. He taught the girl playing the guitar at the beginning to play, I think:

If you're wondering who Tina Guo is, if you've heard the theme from the movie Wonder Woman you've heard her. And as a Cellist on any kind of high tech or classical cello she's kind of amazing.

@DogOnPorch, did you catch the Waterford Michigan rally? Holy Smokes. What a crowd. And over 300,000 watching it on RBSN.

Weird...

Ok, I read it and hmmm... Sounds like there are still mysteries so I'll still be watching the show to see if they're revealed: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/ups-found-tucker-carlsons-documents-relating-to-biden-that-vanished-in-system

I'm interested in these Biden Crime Family documents that disappeared. The ones that were sent to Tucker via UPS so I'll be watching the show to see if any copies turn up. Oh...hang on a sec. Gotta read this one: UPS found Tucker Carlson's documents relating to Biden that vanished in system

I say it again then. I think the rallies are a good indication of what's going to happen on Tuesday. How's that for a prediction.

They cancelled the one in Fayetteville. 50 mph winds. It's scheduled for Monday now.

There was a blond lady with her husband behind the President holding a Melania sign. Suburban housewife, fan of the president. You know? What's not supposed to exist. She was so into it. I couldn't take my attention off her.

Meanwhile back at the rally... The crowd interrupted Melania with their `4 more years` chant. She chuckled. It was so cute.

The fact that the news today suggests America is rebounding into another economic boom-times won`t hurt The Donald`s chances. I wonder if Obama wants to try to take credit for this economic recovery too.

And hey... The First Lady walked on with her husband and introduced him. That`s the first time I`ve seen that. The crowd loved it.

Watching the Trump campaign rallies has made me optimistic for his chances. It isn't just that the crowds are massive. It's that everybody there seems so cheerful. They seem to be having such a good time. I was reading last night about how some GOP chairman or other was having some sort of sign-ups done at the rallies and in the process was recording some surprising statistics. 20 to 50% of sign-ups at the rallies weren't Republicans. Around 20% didn't vote in the last election. If you've watched any of those rallies you know there's a good chance they'll be voting Trump now. And those rallies are spread all over social media and other media. The early results we're hearing from early voting seems to confirm what those stats are suggesting. It isn't just Republicans voting Trump this election. Dems who were so happy about the early voting turnout knowing it's mostly Dems that vote early could be getting a big surprise. Especially when you factor in the well known phenomena of Republicans waiting until election day to vote. If Dems don't swamp the polls in early voting (and the indication seems to be they didn`t) the enthusiastic red wave on election day can be expected to deliver another overwhelming electoral college victory for Trump.

Also social media has made a big gamble and they stand to lose big by censoring the "Biden Crime Family" story. If the Republicans win big the first thing they're expected to go after in the next term is Social Media's section 230 protection allowing them to censor as a platform rather than be liable to lawsuit as a publisher. Google could face more anti trust action as well.

Republicans making hay out of the Biden "crime family" scandal in campaign ads.

And there's a lesson the Dems and Progressives in general seem to need to continue learning. Your underhanded crap can come back to bite you in the ass. An example would be how Dem Senate leader Harry Reid's "nuclear option" requiring only a simple majority rather than 60% zoomed ACB into the supreme court ahead of the election. And they've got the possibility of another one like that coming up. Think about this. Suppose Biden wins and the Republicans win the House. Why wouldn't the Republicans impeach what the emails were calling "The Big Guy?"

You're right of course but are you sure you aren't confusing what McConnell calls the Biden rule with Harry Reid's "nuclear option." https://time.com/5324365/harry-reid-filibuster-reform-supreme-court/ Republican John Thune was prophetic on that one when he said:

As to this: https://islamqa.info/en/answers/11774/ruling-on-covering-the-face-with-detailed-evidence I was talking full, masked, burkas and that's a pretty confusing translation. This one's better: I don't see why that has to be a demand for a full, masked burka. A girl could zip up a hoody and meet those criteria. But if they don't want to go Western and still want to meet the confines of that particular verse there are other options: http://thehijabstore2u.com/product/abaya-dubai-7/ They don't need a mask. Speaking of hypocrisy though why are some Muslims demanding flexibility when somebody mentions say Surah 9.5 but wanting a rigid acceptance of the female dress restrictions verse as they choose to translate it.

It's not a "women's rights" issue over here. In Quebec the restriction is confined to public sector jobs and it's not just a restriction on hijabs. It includes kippas worn by Jewish men, and turbans worn by Sikh men and women, among other things. Nothing hypocritical about that.

I know there are conservatives who won't do polls on the grounds they don't know how personally identifying such polls might be and where the information might turn up in the future. I know this for a fact because I'm one of them.

Hmmm...now that you've got me thinking about it though, I suppose there is an argument to the idea that women's rights are human rights. And I suppose it does reference equality and being treated by the law equally is or should be a human right. On the other, other hand though, say requiring somebody working around certain types of machinery where loose fitting clothing might get caught and endanger a life would be neither woman or human rights issue and could be applied equally. I don't know. Lots to think about.

You mentioned Abayas though. There are many reasons a woman might choose not to wear one of those: 13 Problems faced by women who wear Abayas. I'd support a woman who didn't want to wear one of those as a woman's rights issue. Here or in North Africa.

I hadn't thought about it much, but I suppose it would be more a woman's right issue. I'd support the women protesting against it over there on those grounds. Would I support the wearing of a head scarf over here on those grounds. Sure in most situations, but I don't think it is a women's rights issue over here. I actually have nothing against head scarves myself. Those full face mask beekeeper outfits are a separate issue. I don't see any religious requirement for wearing them. Most of them look stupid, so it isn't fashion. Masking people is a dangerous precedent and can contravene laws, rules or regulations. Personally I don't like them because they feel like they're marking territory and the people I've met hiding behind them have attitude problems, but that's just me. Would you like an example so you can understand why I say that though?