Infidel Dog

Watch both videos above and try to tell me Shapiro didn't hit that one dead on.

Funny you should mention that. I was just thinking about how Argus likes to hijack and project what rational minds used to call the Progressive cult, or the Global Warming cult, or the Social Justice cult on anybody who doesn't hate Trump. I was thinking about it because I was watching this one that's too good to save:

One of the worse racists in American political history was Lyndon Baines Johnson, LBJ. You know the guy who finally adopted the Republicans civil rights policies. The new politically left Snopes doesn't believe you should believe the second one but even they can't deny there's just too much there there to deny he was a rampant racist. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/lbj-voting-democratic/

And Trump has spent his presidency denouncing white supremacy. You guys (progressives and their bot-people) won't accept that., so this denunciation thing works for thee but not for he, eh? Also Byrd didn't just play with the KKK. He was a leader. What they called "an exalted Cyclops." He was all in when he was in then when his slobbering, fast-talking, good ol' boy mouth gave him an opening in the political arena it became politically expedient to get out of the clan. He was still talking like a racist up to the time he died though. And the "Southern Strategy" is regressive leftist revisionism. Wikipedia is useless junk for anything political. It's a hard left partisan site that twists history without conscience. Even the creator of Wikipedia says it's gotten too partisan left and untrustworthy. Last week they were banning editors for being against gay marriage.

As late as 1946, Byrd wrote to the Klan’s Grand Wizard: “The Klan is needed today as never before, and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia and in every state in the nation.” Running for the U.S. House of Representatives in 1952, Byrd worked to distance himself from his Klan activities. He claimed he lost interest in it after a year and dropped his membership in the group. Byrd also said that he joined just for the excitement and because they were opposed to communism. https://www.thoughtco.com/robert-byrd-kkk-4147055 And just going by personal memory I remember Byrd getting into trouble for throwing the N word around shortly before his death.

And now there's this: https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-federal-law-enforcement-confirms-hunter-biden-emails-are-authentic The evidence is authentic. All that remains is discerning what exactly it says.

Add Kazakhstan to the list: https://nypost.com/2020/10/20/photo-biden-meets-hunters-alleged-partner-from-kazakhstan/

The Senate Committee were more concentrating on investigating any truth to an alleged Trump Quid Pro Quo. Even so I don't remember them exonerating Hunter of any wrong doing. Joe didn't have to be guilty to justify Trump's phone call to the Ukrainian President. I don't think so, anyway. But Donald Junior seems to agree with you that it did matter so I'm assuming you can answer his question: Also I think you're underestimating what's on that laptop. It doesn't stop at the Ukraine. There's Iraq, China, the Biden family connections to where the money goes and who knows what else.

But I'd like to hear from Marocc on that one. Was Asma bint Marwan a "foolish" poet who deserved to die for a lack of common decency. Oh, and could you offer up this new Islamic definition of what you call "common decency." Because it sounds like it goes likes this: Offering a graphic depiction of one of history's most notorious pseudo-religious leaders = Not Commonly Decent. Murdering anybody who dares to put Mohammed up in public for possible condemnation = Commonly Decent.

It's easy to see why Muslim's wouldn't want too much about Mohammed revealed. Mo himself had a way of dealing with it much like the Jihadi psycho who murdered the French teacher. Here's a famous one about a poetess from Medina who dared to mention one of the false prophet Mohammed's mulititude of misdeeds: https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/muhammad/women-kill.aspx

Another thing I like about the Right Side Broadcasting coverage is they might be the only media that isn't afraid to show you the size of the crowd - and that includes Fox. In fact I'm pretty sure that's a fact.

Thank you CBS for informing us about "the biggest wildlife in Colorado history" though.

Doesn't matter anyway. Even Fox is running the 'Biden Crime Family' found laptop story now. As the facts become more and more overwhelming fewer are denying it and the denials get lamer. No. It's not fake. The only reason to deny it now is you don't like where or who it's coming from. I can give you ten reasons to realize it's factual to that one from the Progressive machine requiring you to deny it.

If the media and other assorted race-baiters hadn't lied their asses off about Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin there would be no BLM or burning of cities across America. The flames of the black outrage fire Marxists are fanning would have no fuel. George Floyd would be like taking a match to an ice cream cone. Speaking of Trayvon Martin there's an expose about that lie too. Remember how they were able to get the case restarted by producing that strange, fat girl (Rachel Jeantel) as Martin's girlfriend? Turned out she was nothing of the kind. She was the simple minded cousin of the actual girlfriend who had been on the phone with Martin that night. She knew nothing about the case. It was all made up. And she was the star witness of the trial. https://www.bitchute.com/video/bMZc_k8wgfI/

The first time I ever saw that quote you gave was at the confirmation hearing. ACB gave a reply. She explained how her belief system didn't interfere with her ability to judge the law as what is called an "originalist" or somebody or judges the law by the constitution as written. I'm curious why you're more interested in the question than you are in quoting the answer.

It would depend on the context and what sort of liability you're talking about. Legal? Social? Inwardly moral? For example if you're talking about a personal message most social media have rules against sharing what's said in PMs, but I doubt you'd have much of a legal standing if you wanted to go there. The masturbation argument is kind of silly but it reminded me of Penthouse forum where people were encouraged to share their sexual experiences and I'm sure much tissue paper was wasted and many crusty socks were created by the readers. Would they have felt guilt? I don't know maybe...for varying reasons. Should they have? Probably not. Were anonymous characters in the stories damaged? I don't see how. Or are you talking about cases where specific names were named. In those cases one would have to know more specifics about the cases to make a judgement, I think.

You never met a strawman you didn't love and you jumped on that one. In fact you still seem to want to prioritize the diversion from the fact Uncle Joe shows a lot less empathy than people give him credit for. I haven't gotten too deep in the woods arguing the helicopter crash conspiracy but yeah, if I wanted to there is one. I would stress the identity of seal team six was or should have been classified. That's not conspiracy. That's common sense and Joe Biden didn't show any when he leaked the information. https://www.wnd.com/2013/05/biden-now-blamed-in-seal-team-6-deaths/

Well thanks for your opinion on that, Beave. I'm sure it means a lot to you. Not so much to me but thanks anyway. The investigating officer during the Obama years who did the report on the helicopter crash offered an opinion based on the evidence of what happened during the attack. It led him to believe the attack wasn't planned. I'm not sure it matters. That's my opinion. Because as long as we're talking about what we know the other person does Beave, I think it's well established what your MO is. It's to divert. I can't believe you're still trying to get away with it, with me. Here you're diverting from the main point which had to do with incidents where Biden didn't show a lot of empathy. He did a dumb thing. He leaked, through his big, flapping mouth the identity of the unit that took out Bin Laden. It was restricted information. That's not an opinion. That's a fact. It's on video: The families of the downed helicopter were pissed. They saw it as Biden targeting their sons or husbands. Biden didn't show them a lot of empathy or he wouldn't have done such a stupid thing in the first place but when he did he at least owed them an apology. Empathy should have at least instilled a little guilt.

Obama's DoD guy has an opinion "The shoot down was not the result of a baited ambush." I've heard other opinions. But I'm not sure that matters because as far as the credibility of Biden as leader goes this remains a fact: https://www.independentsentinel.com/flashback-joe-biden-revealed-navy-seal-team-six-killed-osama-bin-laden/

The problem there is - as is often the case - those two articles you link to don't show what you'd like them to. Neither shows a Conservative preference to historically prefer the popular vote over the electoral college. The first from the leftist rag Daily News is more a imagination piece to scare progressives about how Bush might react if Gore won the electoral college but lost the popular vote. He offers up an anonymous source to fuel the fire that Bush supporters would cause trouble. We'll never know, because as you'll recall, Bush won. In the second article Reince Preibus and some Republican state senators were suggesting the possibility of not disbanding electoral college but reorganizing how electoral votes could be could be counted. Never went past that. In general though the conservative way is if it ain't broke don't fix it and American conservatives believe the electoral college picking the winner system works for the reasons Bill Whittle and crew expound on in the video above..

So let me translate that. I'm saying presenting Trump as a Psychopath incapable of human empathy is merely what you'd like to believe. And your argument to that is "No. You are." Thanks then maturity level is indicated there.

Yes. I've heard the prevaricating "fact-checkers" of progdom retell the story of the seal team six helicopter crash. I've even listened to the guy who claims he was the seal team six member who killed Bin Laden. Still don't buy it. And I still think the families of the seal team six members that died in the helicopter crash need better answers. Or are they just conspiracy theorists? Where's your empathy man?