Infidel Dog

Oh c'mon...who was it before the election who was saying Trump had nothing to worry about from mail in voting when he suggested the kind of chaos that is happening right now was going to happen and in spite of all the evidence of mail in voting fraud in the past. If that wasn't you it was yours. So as to this claim of yours that "nobody said pretend that fraud doesn’t exist," you remain as always:

Right now, there's tons of evidence of irregularities. Smoking gun evidence of actual fraud is still more or less rare though. People behind Trump suggest they have such evidence and lots of it but it won't be seen until the real and final court battle begins. Maybe. Maybe not. As a watchable moment in history though it's all pretty entertaining.

Yeah, I guess... Still hoping the investigator's Barr says he's sending out can deliver answers to questions like who called for that army of ballot stuffers to turn up at 4 in the morning at the Detroit TFC though. There may be some theories as to why that happened but it's an absolute fact that it did happen. It's on video. Curious people are always going to wonder what was behind it.

I couldn't get past the first sentence. Cut the crap, Beave. We both know who got labeled King of Wrong and even earned his own theme song: Now that obviously bothered you so now you think you come some place where people don't know you yet and flip the script. Rots o ruck with that.

I heard an interesting theory. Take what happened at the TFC in Detroit, example. They said the polls were shut down for the night so everybody went to sleep. What followed was kind of a nightmare version of the story of the elves and the shoe-maker. At 4 in the morning a mass of elves street people arrived at the TFC pulling wagons, carrying sacks or coolers full of ballots. Somebody had to have called them. (It would be nice to know who that was.) The theory goes that the voting machine fraud fix wasn't quite getting it done so they had to call the ballot box stuffer army they were holding in reserve. If true that shows you how much Trump must have actually been ahead.

On the other hand, if the coup is successful I hope Trump at least switches from Twitter to Parler.

You're sounding a bit like Anne Coulter. She gave a speech the other night where she was saying it might be a good thing for the republican party if Trump loses this time and they could have Trumpism (you know, America first and all that) without Trump. Not sure, I'm on board with that. I'd worry stuff like free speech, property rights, the final protection of the second amendment, and small business in a market economy could not survive within four years of power given to the techno fascists, globalists and Progressive Socialists pulling the strings being Biden/Harris.

Only the cops were able to save Antifa's bacon there. Wonder if you could have been there with a petition to "defund the police" just before the wave hit them if Antifa would have still been in a hurry to sign it.

The essence of the left's message and specifically yours now is fraud is nothing to worry about. Pretend you don't see it. In other words, it doesn't exist. So when Tucker's people are able to put about 19 instances of dead people voting before your eyes with a quick scan that makes the fib a glaring lie. And what do you mean by "again," there, King of Wrong?

Oh contraire mon frere. That isn't it at all. In fact it doesn't even matter if the dead people voting thing is wrong. So much fraud is coming from so many places in so many ways a single flaw is meaningless. However the media pushed lie that there is "no"- stress NO voter fraud is disproved by 1 incident. So there is voter fraud the argument is over how much.

Slow down there, Sharky. You don't know how Beave works yet. I'll help you out. He's found a small flaw in a much larger claim but the large disgrace he's claiming is not actually there. Beave likes to blow up little things. It's 'Gotcha by pettifoggery.' You take a tiny thing then say "aha, therefore this much larger thing you showed is now false." Except it's not. Here's what actually happened with the Tucker Carlson error in his count of dead people voting incident. Tucker showed about twenty examples of dead people who voted. The video disappeared shortly after it was put up - about 3 days ago - before there was any guy with a gotcha. I've seen the video since then. Multiple times. People keep putting it up.] Now as far as Mr Blalock goes here's the more complete story on what actually happened there. https://news.yahoo.com/tucker-carlson-walks-back-voter-231215330.html So that was Tucker's actual apology. Is that the way you understood it when Beave first strutted on stage with his "Gotcha.?" Don't worry he'll do this so many times you'll start to notice too. It's kind of his MO. One of them anyway.

Seriously though, you won't understand this and I'm not going to waste time trying to explain it to you but even if you do win you're going to lose.

Here's some for you two.

If it is successful though - which, clearly, is what I was talking about - then yeah, It's a coup.

It's the third try at a coup. You're right it's not been successful...YET

And an apple is a fruit just like a Kumquat. Therefore a Kumquat is an Apple,..right? That's the kind of irrational, non-reason, reasoning gullible victims of the Great Reset might fall victim too. You guys used to call yourselves "the resistance" didn't you? So I'm curious, if your coup stands what will you be calling yourselves then?

That's one way of looking at it. Kind of shrill, hateful, and reeking of desperation if you ask me. But you have an opinion, good for you. I'm not sure if it's yours or one that's been planted in a gullible mind by fake news but it's an opinion. Good for you. I prefer the one below. Somebody took the Rudyard Kipling poem "If" and matched it up with Trump. Your mind wipe won't let you watch it so I'll just tell you - The poem fits the reality like a glove. As to your insisting on calling the open minded a cult, again, that's just projection.

This is interesting below. Up to a million bucks if you can finger the right voting fraudster: The problem will be getting the information into the Progosphere so the right people can hear the news. They'll turn on each other quick enough if they find out rewards are available. No problem there.

No, I saw it. Didn't think it mattered. I just thought there go the Prog-Pods again. Point and scree.

This one's self-explanatory. Compilation of Voter Fraud Videos:

No I told you what that is. Democrats say it's just another unfortunate gaffe from friendly ol' Uncle Joe. Republicans call it a revealing, Freudian slip. He accidentally let the truth out. Oh and without being brave enough to actually say it you seem to be suggesting the quote is not real. No problem. As promised here it is on video:

So I guess you wouldn't be interested in a video showing a computer expert explaining how Dominion software can be exploited then?

C'mon Dora, this election didn't cure you of your faith in polls? Don't they have a name for groups of the faithful who insist on believing in spite of all the evidence reality is offering up to the contrary?