Infidel Dog

They have those now? Give me an example?

Regardless of who is propped up as winner now questions about the legitimacy of the American electoral process will remain. Blame for this should fall squarely on the heads of Democrats and whatever is behind them now.

You don't have to spend all day looking for the source on this one Beave. Just ask I'll link you to the video. They say it was a gaffe on the left. We call it a dead on, Freudian slip on the right.

What will it take to convince you the fix was in?

I'm not so sure. Like I said they were massively prepared to cover their tracks. Cameras were directed to innocent areas or put 30 or more feet away to make sure ballot watchers couldn't see what sort of ballots were being stuffed into the tabulators and it turns out that's important because one of the ways you fix the vote doesn't involve the machines themselves. You just stuff a ballot in there that shouldn't be tabulated. Although it's also possible to cheat both the software and the hardware. There have been previous allegations of Dominion voting tabulator hi-jinks in the 2012 Philippines election. There was a conviction against some company connected to Dominion called Smartmatic. It's run by a Soros operative. A hacker showed how Dominion software could be made to flip votes if you could get 15 minutes alone with it and slip in a different chip. I doubt you read the clip I gave you from the lawyer who did some poll watching, before the election began. He had a chance to talk to a county worker: So did they have a chance to change the chip? There was a plethora of techniques used to keep poll watchers from seeing too much or anything. Covid could be used as an excuse. They would do things like separate democrat poll watchers from Republican, then exclude the Republican saying they were too late and it was too crowded or some other bogus excuse. In Philadelphia there's a recording of a trainer teaching the canvassers how to keep poll watchers from getting close enough to see too much. They could demand 6 feet clearance then push their tables up to 5 feet from the wall so the poll watcher couldn't get behind the canvasser to see what he was up to. One of the main things they didn't want people to see was whether or not the ballot came in what's called a 'secrecy envelope.' There were multiple techniques for hiding that information across all the swing states. Here's an example of one place they wouldn't let watchers see too much about 'secrecy envelopes': And this is all just stuff I remember off the top of my head. There's tons more. Oh like for instance I imagine you heard about them blocking the viewing windows in Detroit: The coup's partners in fraud in the media offered an excuse of course: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/11/10/fact-check-videos-crowd-locked-out-detroit-center-lack-context/6195038002/ There's always an excuse and none of this is hard evidence that will matter in court but you put the gigantic mass of it together and I've yet to see why a reasonable person wouldn't at least wonder why all this diversion and cover-up was necessary. Myself, it convinces me the fix was in. And yes even if the coup succeeds and Harris...pardon me, Biden is offered up as whatever's behind all this's figurehead leader I'll still say this election was fixed.

I believed there was voter fraud before this election. I just believe that this time Swing-State voter fraud was massive and there's massive reason to believe that.

At this point I'm not optimistic all the fraud can be uncovered. They put too much effort into covering their tracks and they seem to have known what they were doing. It's almost like they'd done it before and knew what they could get away with. They were pretty brazen about it. https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/11/06/a-pro-bono-lawyer-for-trump-campaign-shares-what-he-saw-in-pennsylvania

I watched the whole thing and you can too: If you don't want to watch it Argus gave what appears to be some Reddit guy's opinion of what's in there, so I'll give you mine too for comparison. The inquisitors come out of the gate hoping to make the guy think he's in trouble and they're going to help him. What follows is a lengthy game of pressure, then verbal duck and weave where they try to make the guy believe he's telling the same story but they're going to sterilize it for him to make sure he can't get into trouble. At the end of it they've pretty much put the words in the guy's mouth to tell the story the way they want the story to be heard rather than the way Hopkins remembered it. It's kind of the same story - just told through two mealier mouths. Also O'Keefe has another UPS Whistle blower. This guy thinks he saw something shifty too. Maybe Stresser and Klein can get him in a room for a couple hours and convince him there's a better, "safer" way to think about what he heard too. And no I'm not 100% sure I heard the exact word "Safer" but I know damn well that's what the inquisitors meant when they interrogated Hopkins. See that's what they do. They pressure you for an hour, convince you they're on your side and they're there to help, then they say are you sure you heard that exact word - "Safer?" It's a trick. https://www.projectveritas.com/news/breaking-new-pennsylvania-usps-whistleblower-supervisor-told-us-the-only/ Hopkins says he didn't recant and after watching the video of the interrogation I say he's telling the truth.

Here they are collecting ballots well after the media called the state: :

A lot of people are making and checking these lists now. I'm still anxious to see what happens when "Maidengate" finishes theirs.

Fleccas from Fleccas talks replies to CNN debunking a list of dead people voting that nobody had heard of with a list of his own accompanied by checkable verification.

It isn't just Trump now. Somebody else is suing in Detroit concerning the shenanigins at the TFC. https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/12/lawsuit-claims-40000-plus-fraudulent-ballots-pumped-through-detroit-for-joe-biden/

BTW, I don't know what video Newsweek watched but in the one I watched Tucker offered evidence of dead people voting in Georgia not Philadelphia, then he said he didn't know how much of that there was but the fact that it exists means it needs to be further investigated and it also means the claim there is no evidence of voter fraud is a lie.

As to Al Schmidt, that fight over whether or not there's evidence of dead people voting will eventually be decided in the Supreme court. For now, here's Trump's reply to newsweek.

Oh for God's sake. Watch the video. They have a recording of the actual investigators interrogating the guy. You can go here to see the whole thing: https://www.projectveritas.com/ Or if you real brave you can watch this one: https://www.projectveritas.com/news/marine-veteran-and-usps-whistleblower-richard-hopkins-stands-by-original/ He didn't recant. They're lying to you and if you you insist on telling us he did without viewing the evidence they you are lying to us. This lie from the left, concerning the UPS investigation of the Whistle Blower, is well known to the rightosphere. I was waiting for it. And again, you walked right into it. Thanks again, I guess.

Oh and those are sworn documents by witnesses ready to appear before court. Are you saying witnesses can't deliver testimony in your new world order now? Because that would be nuts.

Didn't happen. But this did: Your claim is a lie. Like the one where CNN showed a fireworks display for an annual British fireworks night and claimed it was to celebrate Biden's "win." Your guys lie and then you're trained to believe the lie.

Neil Cavuto helped Progressives out by shutting the White House press secretary off Fox news but, sorry Neil, shutting off doesn't mean shutting down. Here's her information in text: I think the reason Kayleigh is putting this out there is because the media continually claims that there is no voter fraud, or if there is, it’s not enough to matter. But the media doesn’t really matter at this point, it’s the courts. https://therightscoop.com/kayleigh-mcenany-lays-out-voter-fraud-affidavit-allegations-on-twitter-for-all-to-see/ Did you see it this time, you dummies who keep repeating the mainstream lie that there is no evidence?

Here's a better one for you. The grounds for investigation here are tons more substantial than there ever was for the Russian collusion delusion but you were strapped in and fully on board for that one. In fact, I think you still are. Explain that.

There you go again... If you don't know what projection is you should really look it up. Perhaps it will help you from continuing to embarrass yourself. I doubt it, but perhaps.

YouTube seems to want to make this one disappear but people keep putting it up. Let's see if Donald Trump can make it stick this time: Basically Tucker is producing evidence of dead people voting:

Then there were all the irregularities in the process. Hard evidence? Possibly not, but they were like a neon sign telling any reasonable person something fishy was going on:

Although... I guess it's possible you haven't seen any of the evidence. The machine does seem to be disappearing a lot of it. I notice a Tucker Carlson clip on a previous page where he was showing the evidence for dead people voting was vanished off YouTube. There's a new whistle blower. This time she's from Dominion software. If you click quick you might get to see it before the authority makes it go away. There's also this thing I notice you guys do where any tiny diversionary critique by pettifoggery allows you to put it on ignore. For example you don't like James O'Keefe, so when he finds a UPS whistle blower who tells you ballots were to be taken to his supervisor to be pre-dated if they were sent after Nov. 3 your brain comes with a setting where that just didn't happen.

Your idea that what you choose not to see means it doesn't exist is less than impressive.

The fix was in. The conspiracy was large. It began long before the election and continues to this day. It came from big tech, the corporate media, state and federal politics, state courts, all the way down to minor operatives and officials. It is doubtful you could convince me none of that happened because you and yours have had at least a year to offer some reason anybody should ignore any or all of it but all I've seen when any of the dirty doggery is pointed out to you guys is the sort of thing I saw in the rest of your quote above that I won't bother dealing with. Basically this: