Infidel Dog

Not only that but there's a vaccine for the flu. Two things to consider when you're comparing flu death numbers to Covid's. Also in America and possibly in Canada there are financial perks for listing Covid as the cause of death. Same thing for the flu? Show me. I don't believe you.

I don't imagine you'll be hearing about the CDC downgrading actual deaths from the Chi-Comm virus down from 200,000 in the US to 10,000: CDC Quietly Admits That Less than 10,000 Really Died from COVID-19

See the problem with answering that question is two fold. 1. The answer can be lengthy if you haven't been paying attention to both sides of the argument. 2. Anybody asking it is already immediately noticeable as one those trained to ignore the obvious so he doesn't actually want to know the answer. But if you ever should be enjoying a genuinely curious moment, free of the corporate media mind-wipe try this one: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/11/illegitimate-election-plunges-republic-crisis-daniel-greenfield/ And if you'd like to know what I mean by ignoring the obvious try this one: https://spectator.us/reasons-why-the-2020-presidential-election-is-deeply-puzzling/

I'm not sure if I understand this correctly but the Libertarians at Reason seem to think that the certification means Alito stands between "the pending application from Pennsylvania" and the Supreme court. They seem to think this means Alito will deny whatever that is and the case never makes it to the Supreme court. It's this guy's opinion: JOSH BLACKMAN is a constitutional law professor at the South Texas College of Law Houston, an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute, and the President of the Harlan Institute. https://reason.com/volokh/2020/11/24/now-that-pennsylvania-has-certified-its-election-results-we-may-never-know-whether-justice-barrett-would-have-recused-from-the-election-litigation/#comments

And the following month there was this from the Supreme Court justice who oversees the area: Justice Alito orders Pennsylvania officials to set aside late-arriving ballots

Possibly but there's this:

Cartoons? Bill Maher and Paul Joseph Watson are political commentators from opposite sides of the political spectrum. But I guess if you'd rather not hear them engage in a duel of wits on video, oh well... You're running the show.

Is Maher happy because the neo-liberal war machine is back?

Actually...there may be even more to it than that and she may have physical evidence: https://conservativeus.com/sidney-powell-weve-got-pictures-of-the-check-stubs-paid-to-people-to-ballot-harvest-audio/

Who said he was a biased judge? I said Giuliani blew another one, but at least it gets them closer to the supreme court. The previous cases were about things like slowing the process down so the Dem crooks didn't have a chance to ditch more evidence. Those were crooked judges and officials aiding and abetting that. These schmucks are stuck in a position where the better part of valor is to cover their nuts say there's not enough evidence to change an election and move it up the ladder. To be honest it won't surprise me if even the Supremes have to shrug their shoulders and say 'too bad, so sad, guys. They hid the smoking gun and made cucks of all of us." I'll still say it was a fixed election attempt at a coup though. Whether or not the coup was 100% successful or not will really depend on what happens in January. Will the Progressive globalists and their corporate sponsors be able to fix the two Senate runoffs as easy as they fixed the Presidential? If they can, then America - in fact, all of the free West is toast. Oh and Beave you're clueless as always. I'm not going to retry the Mueller, collusion delusion with you. I'll tell you the same thing you'll be telling me if your corporate backed, globalists and leftists are able to fix these two elections. Mueller lost. You lost. Get over it.

Giuliani's team blew another one but... Federal appeals court dismisses Trump campaign lawsuit over Pennsylvania voting procedures A federal appeals court dismissed a lawsuit by the Trump campaign over Pennsylvania's voting procedures on Friday, paving the way for the issue to escalate all the way up to the Supreme Court. Despite Trump's lawyer Rudy Giuliani arguing to a lower court that widespread voter fraud occurred in a state where President-elect Joe Biden won by over 80,000 votes, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said “the campaign’s claims have no merit.” The Trump campaign has the option of asking the U.S. Supreme Court for emergency injunctive relief, which would go to Justice Samuel Alito, who would then likely ask his eight colleagues to weigh in. "The activist judicial machinery in Pennsylvania continues to cover up the allegations of massive fraud. We are very thankful to have had the opportunity to present proof and the facts to the PA state legislature. On to SCOTUS!," Jenna Ellis, Trump's attorney and campaign adviser, said in a statement on Twitter after the court ruling. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-appeals-court-dismisses-trump-campaign-lawsuit-pennsylvania-voting-procedures

And yet you just couldn't, could you?

He wasn't investigating obstruction of justice. It would be like Giuliani admitting he had no case for election fraud or irregularities then saying however let's talk about Hunter Biden saying his dad takes kickbacks. Unless you're saying Mueller couldn't do his job because he was being obstructed. If he has evidence of that let him produce it and show preponderance of evidence in spite of being denied hard evidence by obstruction as the Trump campaign is doing. Because Giuliani has a better chance of producing evidence of for real obstruction if you still want to make comparisons. And what is this supposed to prove? It sounds more like "Wah! I couldn't produce evidence of a crime but that doesn't mean that maybe somehow, some way there maybe, might have been one. Oh and Trump is a big, fat poopie head." Really it's just Mueller admitting he had nothing.

Well that's an opinion from a message board user. Here's a contrary opinion from a commenter at the blog that posted those infographics. I won't retry the Mueller case with you. He had nothing. He admitted there was nothing and that's good enough for me.

If Mueller could have shown a preponderance of evidence alleging Trump colluded with Russia he would have and that would have been enough for the media to scream of Trump's guilt from the rooftops. But Mueller didn't do that. He didn't do it because he couldn't. The Trump campaign can produce a preponderance of soft evidence easily but they have yet to produce a physical, smoking gun. To change the results of the election they'll need one. That's why comparing the two is a false equivalency.

Oh wait... I forgot the second L in Hillary. Prog logic therefore demands the above must be ignored. Right Beave? Right Di?

Election fraud claims are supported by a preponderance of evidence. Here are the supportable claims in Sydney Powell's lawsuit: More on the evidence for those here: https://directorblue.blogspot.com/2020/11/infographic-shocking-allegations-of.html Mueller had a preponderance of nothing sparked out of nothing more than a phony document commissioned by Hilary Clinton that got some media attention by claiming falsely that Trump peed on some Russian Hookers.

If they can prove this is real it will be interesting. It says the Chi-Comms were producing and sending over fake ballots:

Here's one for you to spell check from the link to the claim of fraud in Nevada above: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/historically-strange-spike-in-incomplete-nevada-voter-files-casinos-as-home

My mistake. Yes Just the News appears to have just copied Defending the Republic's paste job for Michigan rather than Georgia. However, in double-checking that I noticed something interesting. Check out Beave's original circling of spelling typos: https://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums/uploads/monthly_2020_11/image.thumb.jpeg.3c49aab1df0a0efeb60f34cd3f4bba70.jpeg Ok, now check out what's up there now: https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf Defending the Republic appears to have corrected their typos. Ever done that? I know I do it all the time. In fact I just did.

I've seen this one around in different places: 'Historically strange' spike in incomplete Nevada voter files, casinos as ‘home’ At this point I don't care how many spelling errors Sydney Powell's people make or how many muck-ups Rudy makes of stats, I'm with these guys:

It was fraud in plain sight but the left's pet media and their compliant pod-people tell us 'Don't trust your lying eyes.' Show us the physical evidence we destroyed.

The problem is the blatant blocking of poll watchers and destruction of evidence makes it pretty much impossible to acquire hard or physical evidence.