Jump to content
A Note on Topic Titles – Be Clear & Descriptive!

Infidel Dog

Senior Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,868

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    28

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Infidel Dog

  1. Infidel Dog
    Yeah, I know, but it was also the one I was replying to. Kind of an interesting phenomena but if you compare stats the whole West coast seems to have done better than many other areas of the country. I don't think a love of restrictions explains it because these other areas often share that affection.
  2. Infidel Dog
    Yeah you don't want to continue making your argument rely on the mass of states. You're right it is better if you stick specifically to Texas versus California. Statistically.
  3. Infidel Dog
    You forgot to mention the fact it has the second largest population. Kind of key, don't you think? New York, Illinois, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Arizona, New Jersey, Tennessee, Michigan, Indiana, Massachusetts, South Carolina, Alabama and Louisiana all have higher death rates per million than Texas. And that's the stat that matters. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/
  4. Infidel Dog
    And if China hadn't lied and WHO hadn't perpetuated that lie Europe could have protected itself. And now Biden is going "Kissy, Kissy, let's make up" with both of them - China and WHO.
  5. Infidel Dog
    Could be. The left wants to 'Cancel' the Right. And the Right have been reacting by hanging a moon in their ridiculous faces. You should be happy. The alternative would be we take you seriously and trust me, you don't want that.
  6. Infidel Dog
    Is that all you want? Sure I can do that for you. Try to speak more clearly next time. Covering your pubic area as a legal necessity is a public decency restriction. It's a law that's developed as a cultural imperative over time in civilized societies. Were you still wanting us wearing masks for the length of time the civilized populace have been wearing pants? Masks are supposed to be necessary to protect against a public emergency. Originally this "emergency" was just supposed to last as long as it took to "flatten the curve." That became something else. Now there are those who would like to turn it into a cultural pants-wearing kind of thing in spite of the fact this "emergency" element for mask wearing is becoming debatable and moreso as the time stretches out. I think that's the problem. Pants wearing and mask wearing are not the same thing but there are those like yourself who would like to convince us they are so they turn mask wearing into the new normal for as long as they can mandate it. I read a headline yesterday saying Texas is relieving mask restrictions so it migth become interesting with maskers becoming an indication less of health protection and more of areas that have given up their sovereignty to accept subservience to the new corporate globalist oligarchy.
  7. Infidel Dog
    I could probably help him if I had a better idea what he's talking about. I've been busy all day and most of the evening. I come here and Bubber tells me he's stumped me somehow. So I look at a reply he gave me earlier when I wasn't here and he's clipped the quote so it's not saying what it said in the original. Then he asks me to explain it. So yeah...that's a definite WTF. Success then, Bubber. You've succeeded in not making sense...again. Why is that so important to you though?
  8. Infidel Dog
    The mask-people who bug me are the ones who get all sanctimonious about telling you to pull your mask up over your nose. If there's a scientific study somewhere supporting the idea anybody anywhere is in some kind of clear and present danger because one of those store bought masks is not being pulled up over a nose I'd like to see it. Makes some weak-minded people feel they have some kind of superior insight and power by telling you to pull your mask up though. And no, I don't think that's the same thing as somebody telling you to pull your pants up. Might be closer to equivalent though.
  9. Infidel Dog
    Let me be the first to say it. Flipping the quote and edit buttons was either an inconvenient convenience or an unfunny joke.
  10. Infidel Dog
    Robertson back-stabbed Alex Jones for the SPLC, did he? Anybody who knows Roberson's MO won't be surprised. Caolan Roberson has a long history of turning on if not cheating, and outright ripping off or blackmailing non-progs who were naive enough to hire him or let him close. It goes back at least to Rebel media. Alex Jones should have known better. No sympathy. Now Caolan's lined up with the SPLC is he? Good. Now it's crystal clear. Anybody having anything to do with Caolan Robertson after this has only themselves to blame.
  11. Infidel Dog
    Doesn't really matter. The ol' Dementia patient is in power now - hiding, trembling behind razor wire and a DC wide wall of armed guards from the populace, in a fraudulent pose he's supported by a steadily dwindling minority of what the real power behind the throne demands we believe was a record majority.
  12. Infidel Dog
    Yeah, yeah, Beave, we know.' Don't believe your lying eyes.' Getting kind of tired, Man. Hey, speaking of tired, did you hear where tired ol' Joe Biden is climbing onto the cancel culture bus to cancel Dr. Seuss? The Cancel Creeps have been busy since Joe took office. They got The Muppets and Mr. Potato Head on their knees and now they've got the Biden regime on board with cancelling Doctor Seuss. https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/dr-seuss-cancels-book-titles Keep it up, Biden dummies. You're losing Generation Z.
  13. Infidel Dog
    Just so it's crystal clear where I'm coming from I'll let South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem spell it out for you. Diversity of energy is our strength. And if you're hoping to cut coal out of equation with fear mongering pushing the idea of "ooh scary coal" while denying us the obvious observation of clear skies in the US and Canada well...it's you that's irrelevant.
  14. Infidel Dog
    It is if you're pushing a 'fear the CO2' narrative. Are you?
  15. Infidel Dog
    There's this: and there's this:
  16. Infidel Dog
    Bullshit. There's this: and there's this: It matters. It's relevant.
  17. Infidel Dog
    Did he? Whoever that genius was, turned out he was correct. Didn't click the link, did ya?
  18. Infidel Dog
    So, do you remember this one? It wasn't just NBC spreading it. It was everywhere in corporate and social media. And it was a lie. Anthony Watts shows you the facts. “Wind was operating almost as well as expected”… A Texas-sized Energy Lie This is often the MO of the news media of the corporate and state left. A story will break. They'll find somebody who will be willing to make a claim that will support a narrative they'd prefer to push. That story will lead the news for weeks. Later the facts will show the claim to be false but you'll never hear about that unless somebody like Anthony or me tells you. I have tons of examples if you'd like to hear them.
  19. Infidel Dog
    There may not be "clean coal" but there is cleaner and North America's burning of coal for energy is the cleanest. The lazy thinking of the left requires you to be afraid of "cleanest" coal and they'll show you pictures of smoke covered China or LA in the 70s to fan the flames. The brain-training system put into place by the elite whose deceptive whispers they sanction as whole truth demands it. "Oh noes! The sky is burning. The bosses told me so and a Swedish teenager agrees so it must be true. We must run and tell the king because we're the smart ones." If WCM's figures are right, he has a point. Calm down. Stop being silly.
  20. Infidel Dog
    Yeah and double-oops:
  21. Infidel Dog
    ^^^ Ick.
  22. Infidel Dog

    Here's a difference between what I'll call Progs and what I'll call non-progs.

    A prog will link you to an article and it's like they're hoping you won't actually click the link and read it because it rarely says what they insinuate is in there.

    A non-prog, on the other hand, wants you to watch or read the source they're linking to. 

    Watch I'll give you an example of what happens though...

    Below is a link to a Conservative YouTuber named Daisy Cousens. I post it because I'd like people to consider what she's saying. She's going to imagine what a world under the great reset would look like.

    Now if a Prog were to respond to that and you had watched the video, you'd be able to tell within two sentences that they didn't actually watch it. But they'd be spewing their expertise on what they imagine is in there and they'd be raging against the person who dared to say or think what they were imagining was said or thought.

    You can actually use this to your advantage if you find yourselves in an argument with one of them.

    If it's an information link where arguments are imagined and addressed . The inevitable attack of the Proggery is easy-peasy to slap back. The reply to whatever they say is already in the source. Copy, paste, or simply quote and chuckle in response to their lame arguments because they didn't read or watch the article or video. 

    1. Show previous comments  4 more
    2. Boges

      Boges

      Also, you have called me a "Progressive" before. 

      Based only on my opposition to Trumpism. 

    3. Infidel Dog

      Infidel Dog

      Quote

       

      So you're admitting you didn't watch the whole video?

      Kind of...

      I'd only watched half, then I got busy with something else. I figured I'd watch it later - which I just did.

      She says something fascinating about the new class structure at about the 9 minute mark.

      She's talking about the lofty goals of saving the world from the new elite's imagined climate crisis with O emissions and how none of their "solutions" would have to work...

      "The resetters wouldn't really mind if it didn't work, because either way they would win. The corporates would wield an unprecedented level of wealth. Political leaders would wield more power than any world leader in history.

      It wouldn't be socialism or fascism or any of those warning signals the questioners frantically threw around before they were all 'hushed up.' 

      It would instead be neo-feudalism - a structure in which an elite, wealthy class of unelected officials would own everything, while commoners existed only to be owned and used by the ruling class." 

      And I think you're confusing the type of conservative I am. I think you're thinking I'm the Argus-style conservative who bends and grabs his ankles to watch the evening's corporate news and adopts their enemies and objectives as his own.

      I'm more a North-American traditionalist style conservative who believes in rights of the individual to pursue happiness over a portioning of proposed egalitarian rights from above, opportunity over outcome, equality over equity, the sanctity of free speech, private property and all that.

      I'm old enough to remember when even in Canada conversations might contain the claim "It's a free country." I liked that.

      At no point should you believe I, or any of my ilk would be content being Corporate or any other kind neo-feudalist serfs.

      In fact there's a book we like called "The Road to Serfdom" warning against it. It's not for Argus or his Progressive Conservative brethren.

       

       

    4. Infidel Dog

      Infidel Dog

      There was a time before whatever the type of Conservative Argus is hijacked the ideology that we North American Traditional conservatives could get along with Libertarians and classical Liberals. We'd debate but we could get along. There was an overlap of ideas. None of us want neo-feudalism under a Globalist oligarchy spun out of a take over by corporates and money managers.

  23. Infidel Dog
    Also I'm getting kind of lost here. What does any of this have to do with Tucker being less impressed with whoever these Qanon guys are than the regressive left is?
  24. Infidel Dog
    Exactly, the insinuation is he doesn't want to see her get 'suicided by Hillary' the way her boyfriend (Epstein) did. He wishes the same imagined mercy for the reporter asking the question. I imagine he'd even wish that mercy for you who obviously hates him. Not sure what your problem is. You hate the guy but he'd wish you mercy.
  25. Infidel Dog
    I just looked at your link to see what was actually said. Yeah...I know, I'm not supposed to do that. I'm just supposed to mindlessly accept whatever you're implying might be in there. Problem is those two things never seem to line up. The way I read what trump said is he implied what happened to Epstein in jail might have been murder and he hoped that wouldn't happen to Maxwell. He told the reporter asking the question that he hoped that wouldn't happen to anybody not even him. It was kind of a clever retort, really.
×
×
  • Create New...