Infidel Dog

One thing's getting clear from that piece. Suspicions Forbes has flipped to become the new foot soldiers of the new Corporate left gets more credible with each article they foist on us disparaging the other side of the argument. Also and as I said yesterday with Rush dead Tucker becomes the new enemy # 1 of the corporates, globalists, socialists and other leftists. As far as Qanon goes, I'm with what DOP seems to be suggesting - if the left wasn't all the time talking about them I wouldn't even know they exist. And I'm a Conservative. They keep telling us with their best scared voices the Organic food eating, climate alarmist, buffalo head wearing shaman guy at the capitol building protest was a Qanon enthusiast. If that's the best you have to scare us with I don't like your chances. Near as I can understand though from what the corporate and state media of the left tell me about Q is they're these guys who hang around the internet telling each other stories about how there's this secret cabal of child molesting, pervo elites, behind the power running the country. So OK, Q are conspiracy theorists, but on the other hand if there was a secret cabal of child molesting pervo elites managing the message they would be trying pretty hard to shut down anybody suggesting there was a secret cabal of pervo elites managing the message. It would be overkill, in fact. Way to make Q seem credible, dummies.

Don't know how true this is: BETRAYED: How Parler Sold Out to the Globalist Establishment to Get Back Online https://bigleaguepolitics.com/betrayed-how-parler-sold-out-to-the-globalist-establishment-to-get-back-online/ But for now consider Parler taken off the list.

This one's easy to recommend because it's for anyone, regardless of bias: https://ground.news/ It's a news comparison service that lists current news stories then tells you what media is covering the story, how and how much allowing you to make decisions about their bias. Hat tip to Sydney Watson

There's a quote from that one that needs to be remembered: ~ When they come for you they will talk like social workers - guaranteed ~

I hear that now Rush is gone, Tucker has become their enemy # 1. If they have to 'Hillary' Tucker to shut him up will they celebrate his death the way they did Rush's death to cancer? Is there a limit to their depravity that the gullibles won't mindlessly accept.

I had to click over to YouTube to thumbs up that one.

So dead-on. Makes you wonder how long the corporate globalists' media can have so many ignoring the obvious. I hear the razor-wire protected congress is currently trying to pass laws making counter media like Fox, OAN, and Remax illegal. But if you notice obvious facts like that you're a Trump cultist, a conspiracy theorist and most likely a racist. And if history repeats itself that itself will eventually become a crime punishable by re-education or depending on severity a possible trip to the gulags.

That seems to be the trend worldwide: Thank You "Operation Warp Speed" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Warp_Speed Trump leading the world.

It's worth noticing how the new Pravda style media can spin black to tell you it's white. The Washington Post and others are pleased to report there is a new "Migrant facility for children" opening up to assist the huddled masses yearning to be free. Or to put it in a more reality based form the new regime is opening the border again. The flood of what once were called illegals is coming. There's already more than they can handle. So they're going back to the old Obama 'kids in cages' policy they were blasting Trump for when he took over: https://www.bizpacreview.com/2021/02/23/wapo-biden-admin-torched-over-re-opening-of-migrant-facility-for-children-amid-border-uptick-1033779/

Well if all you have left are conspiracy theories I heard a wild one that's even more fun than that. It says Roberts was an Epstein client. It says the PTB are holding evidence of it over his head and that's why he flips left on every important decision now.

The totality of the evidence has never been considered. That doesn't mean it doesn't exist. You're talking about a portion of the evidence. It needed to be considered too, for the the reasons Justice Thomas gave.

All this case or the ones before it show is the American legal system fears the evidence. Notice they didn't say what evidence they were aware of was wrong. They just said they didn't want to see it even if it was right. Cowards.

Justice Clarence Thomas is my new Hero: " In his dissent Justice Thomas argued mass mail-in voting, which was conducted in Pennsylvania for the first time ahead of the 2020 presidential election in November, combined with election rules being rewritten last minute, makes the process prone to fraud and mistrust. "The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the 'Manner' of federal elections...Yet both before and after the 2020 election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we received an unusually high number of petitions and emer- gency applications contesting those changes. The petitions here present a clear example. The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day," Thomas wrote. "Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days. The court also ordered officials to count ballots received by the new deadline even if there was no evi- dence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future. These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set elec- tion rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable." "One wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us," he continued."

Actually I'm right again. 6 of the 9 supremes did not judge the evidence. Instead they decided it was "moot." Not sure what the legal definition of that word is but the literal one is "Irrelevant." So they said the evidence is irrelevant. Therefore no need see it. Translated - Once more the cowards running the legal system fear the evidence. I guess there are only 3 judges left in the United States with balls to see evidence they worry might force them to make an uncomfortable decision. Thomas, Gorsuch and Alito. Really disappointed in Kavanaugh and Coney Barret. Roberts appears to have them under his traitorous thumb.

I was listening to Dana Loesch this morning. She has a radio show from Texas. She says it was 60 degrees and she opened all her windows. That's Farenheit in Texas.

I deny catastrophic human-caused global warming as a well supported imminent phenomena or as something that can be or must be mitigated if it ever is shown to be imminent. Would that fit your definition. Because if it doesn't then it doesn't really matter if Shady believes humans cause some warming and that might modify some global climate somehow. There would be no need to discuss it other than as something that might or might not occur and who knows maybe someday humans might even be able to do something about it. Doubtful though.

Here's an interesting little nugget you won't see on state or corporate leftist media: Biden told Letterman he got arrested at 21 for breaching chamber at US Capitol, sitting in VP chair

Rhetoric based on out the butt reasoning and red herrings. Here's what happened in Texas. Data shows Wind Power failed first. This put stress on the rest of the grid. https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/cascend-data-shows-wind-power-was-chief-culprit-texas-grid-collapse ERCOT had been too busy chasing subsidies, building wind turbines to insulate, or prepare to re-supply existing power suppliers like coal and natural gas. When the polar vortex hit they were unprepared. But it all started with primary stress put on building windmills. It's explained here: https://rumble.com/ve12c9-texas-power-outages-explainedjason-isaac-american-thought-leaders.html

Deniers of what? Deniers that the evidence of an unavoidable climate catastrophe caused by man's emissions of fossil fuels is unimpeachable science and demands an upheaval of political systems to supposedly fix the problem they imagine? I deny that. I suggest the catastrophe some claim to know is coming not only can be challenged by science but should be because real science is meant to be challenged by the scientific method, not by mindlessly accepting hypotheses as unimpeachable fact. And even if you could predict a climate catastrophe, it would be naive to think politicians could change the climate with available solutions or that there wouldn't be larger consequences where problems created would outweigh any solutions. For example, I hear a suggestion warmiacs are putting forward lately of climate "lockdowns." A little "denial" is required there, I think. More than a little. For now man has been more than a little successful at adapting to problems and for multiple reasons that would be a more rational reaction to possible problems than thinking politicians can fix the weather. If that way of thinking is "denial" sign me up for your new definition.

I saw this one below on Gab and now it's on YouTube so I can transfer it. It's worth seeing because it fleshes out the feeling many have of the hidden racism coming from Biden and his corporate left globalist puppet-masters sponsors. In this one they deal with Biden's racism of lowered expectations: I hear he's also re-instituted the racist practice of what Communist professors call "critical race theory."

Real Texans are more concerned about the scourge of progressive socialists pouring out of Democrat governed hellholes like California and bringing their dysfunctional ideologies with them. Yeah I heard about that. What a weenie. Never apologize to the SJW, crybully mob of cancel creeps.

And if you are worried about state government mismanagement and hypocrisy you might want to take a look at what the "Lockdown," Democrat governor of New Mexico has been up to. New Mexico Dem governor spent taxpayer cash on groceries, booze: reports (Bet you're sorry you Beetlejuiced me now, eh, Beave? )

Oh and Beave I just read the rest of your lengthy post. You need to get away from those critical race theory, racist nutbags. They're lying to you. You're white. No need to hate yourself.

What might be scarier is how vulnerable societies are to failures in the power grid. One of Biden's recent idiot EOs commanded states to open their power grids up to Chinese investment. What possible harm could come from that, right?