Tdot

Are you sure you used enough, commas, when you published this? I see a few places you could've added commas, no doubt, indeed.

More proof of the anti-United way of politics in the States, which prefaced the COVID 19 disunity we see now, was at their SOTU Address Trump gave. It was televised in many nations that day, so potentially billions of people got to see the disrespect/disunity which one party has, for the other. Yes many countries including the USA's insurgent foes/terrorist cells, got to see up close and personal the trifling behavior of Nancy Pelosi in representing the Dem party: And to further sow the seeds of, disunity, the irresponsible network CNN exalted Pelosi for her juvenile delinquent behavior.

lol ... does 'wasted afternoon' now = saved the day?

I hate that your afternoon is wasted, perhaps you can save the day ---by using your evening to figure out just how long did dinosaurs exist during their time on Earth.

I said Mankind won because we do not know how long dinosaurs were alive, as we only know how long ago they perished. Whereas we know Mankind has been alive for about 6,000 years, AND COUNTING, at least according to the holy bible's clues. So IMHO if we ever get proof that dinosaurs were alive for longer than 6,000 years then you will have a valid point.

My name is Tdot. Please respect that like I respect your moniker here lol and no, one (1) 200yr old tortoise does not prove the theory you purported here. Let me know too, if you create a thread on that topic. I'm going to get back onto the issue here.

Not really. Unless we know for a fact that the amount of 100yr old humans does not outnumber the amount 100yr old tortoises, true? Nonetheless, I am glad we can agree to disagree on your dinosaur philosophy.

Oh, okay. I didn't know that that is what you were referring to here. IMHO we do not have a reliable way of knowing how long any dinosaur did actually, live, as I only see scientists gauging how long ago it was that dinosaurs walked on the Earth. There's a big difference, true? For example, what if dinosaurs are no different than today's reptiles ---when they die off after 20-30-40 years? It might mean that although this dinosaur mortality rate did happen, millions of years ago, it does not change how that mortality rate means the avg dinosaur's life was not longer than the avg humans' life is today.

Okay, I can respect that. And feel free to give some examples of where I can find these invincible dinosaurs today.

When I look around, am I wrong, that it appears we have long beat the dinosaurs?

lol ...In real time?!!! When I look around, am I wrong, that it appears we long beat the dinosaurs?

Mankind. According to world history.

...or... d.) all of the above? https://www.biblestudytools.com/topical-verses/bible-verses-about-plagues/

I apologize, if you dislike where the truth/the facts come from. And as far as me not posting here? Too late for that. Especially, if it caused you to decide that now truths/facts should not be acknowledged ---whenever we don't like where the truth/the facts came from. And perhaps .......... Don't reply to my posts? That might make things a little easier for you here in a public forum. And if you disregard those Breitbart links, that is okay too, but hey you'll get the same concept of reality from the Twitter link I posted there as well ---tweets by U.S. Senator Tom Cotton.

How do you feel it is different? IMHO it looks like the same old 'no unity' business as usual, since Ebola in 2014-'16 (regarding Republicans unfair to Obama) and also since 2017 when Trump took his oath. Especially if you do experience any of the USA's big 4 tv networks or Sirius XM, it becomes very obvious how this is all about a power grab and it is not about uniting their country to defeat the pandemic. It's sad too, to see the U.S. President feel boxed-in to giving a live daily briefing, to the world, about what he and his Task Force do each day to combat the pandemic. And it's all because the liberal Dem's tv networks are politicizing the Coronavirus, instead of uniting the country to defeat the virus. Even the processes of that stimulus pkg their GOVT just passed, displayed the USA's treachery toward its own citizens if you honestly gauge the Dem's earmarks which held the bill up for the past week. Just look at the many things in the bill which Pelosi/Schumer tried to require altho they have nothing to do with the pandemic but everything to do with future 'politrix' if you will. https://twitter.com/sentomcotton/status/1242169734763819011 https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/03/12/white-house-report-nancy-pelosi-pressed-to-include-taxpayer-funding-of-abortion-in-coronavirus-stimulus/https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/03/23/jobs-creators-network-calls-out-millionaires-pelosi-schumer-for-blocking-legislation-to-help-ordinary-americans/

Well in that case, let me put it far more succinctly then; I have no control over your hallucinations in here.

It is your right to contend that I do not engage in intellectual discourse. But you failed to provide any proof, outside of your obtuse opinion. Yes. Just like the proof you failed to provide, when claiming I engaged in subjective comments trying to intellectualize misguided characterizations of trying to repress homosexual desires by posing any human can unlearn being gay. And since you have never met me nor know whatever it is that I embody, in life, then I do not need to bother asking how that line of thinking is working out for you ... Which is why you see no question there. Mainly because you made it very, clear, how your line of thinking is working out for you. It's a flawed foundation because it is not based in, logic, that you feel nothing wrong with approaching humans with the whimsical bizarre claims you make ---at people you've never encountered in life. Moreover I argue that you have engaged in, colossal dishonesty, if you claim that I tried to define other people's behavior at any point here. As I reviewed your posts at others here especially before I posted here, I saw the huge difference between you and I. A colossal difference which your emotional intelligence likely could never get cognizant of; I love to invite people to help me understand their thinking yes so then we all can respect and revere each other, easier, whereas you are not like that. Because you enjoy your right to disregard what other people think, whenever it is not inline with narratives that your narcissism has polluted your reasoning and rationale with. And considering that my posts here do exactly reveal that I love and respect and engage all humans no matter if heterosexual or homosexual, plus how I never mentioned anything about anyone unlearning to be Jewish, as well as the fact that I never said a word about any Tom Cruise nor anxiety? It further highlights how your opinions here are guided only by your, narcissism, or perhaps any hallucinogens you ingested. And please, do not get back to me ---not with your curriculum nor for anything else here. lol. I think I will be doing myself a huge, service, by steering clear of the misery which you burden this great website with. But if you ever want to talk in person/need veracious help loosing yourself from, demons, then hey give me a holler if you're ever in the Bloor/Yonge Street area of the big 6

... I agree that you expressed complete thoughts. I was able to determine that thanks to my same, exact reasoning, which I used to express my complete thoughts here. Such as I where I posted "I don't think I ever said that every relationship involves procreation, nor that homosexual couples can not adopt..." And where I said "Since every homosexual was in fact, procreated, then it becomes all about understanding if homosexuals feel...". The same goes, for when I said "...after we [humans] are created, then humans no longer have a responsibility to that reality/that process which [also] did create each homosexual." So thanks for referencing that important reality, when I was able to expound on it.

Okay, I can respect you posting that opinion here. But since I never discussed dancing and I also never mentioned compassion, then is your response...incoherent?

Yes, China was exposed here, a bit too late. So far, Donald Trump (trade war) has been the only thing coming close to strong-arming China, since the 80s. And we now see/feel what China sent to North America, to show its anger.

Thank you, for having a lot of passion toward my opinion.

I don't think I ever said that every relationship involves procreation, nor that homosexual couples can not adopt. Since every homosexual was in fact, procreated, then it becomes all about understanding homosexuals if homosexuals feel that after we are created, then humans no longer have a responsibility to that reality/that process which did create each homosexual.

Okay, I can respect that. Then since there would no relationships without procreating and there would be no life with procreating; what priority, can 'procreating' be fairly assigned?

Sadly, this is 'ostensible satire' for sure.