Tdot

Exactly!! Yes you put the cart before the horse and now I get to, Thank you, for solidifying my stance here re China's evil onto non-BRICs humans.

IMHO it can in fact be a, value, if the society has tied an empirical number to equality in some aspect of the society. For example the price of a subdivision's replica homes in a certain zip code, cannot use any Homeowner's Race, as a reason to devalue the cost of a home. Such a realtor, will instead be expected to use the same exact 'comparative statuses, which mean homes are equal to one another.' when selling those homes ... Because Equality is exactly a goal, in itself, wherever it is intended to fairly ensure when some quantities are to be equal. Fairness, is no different. Whenever any uneven quantities or statuses or awards or anything else are determined to be equitably distributed ---in the minds of all parties involved--- then that is the denotative meaning of fairness.

Niiice.

You are correct here. And that's because it is untrue, as citizens are being asked to delay only cosmetic surgeries these days. Remember now, Mr. Trump recently sent that huge Navy hospital ship to NY so to aid their non-COVID urgencies and surgeries.

I disagree with this. I haven't seen so much as one (1) network treating this pandemic, as less than, a once-in-a-lifetime occurrence. Altho that is independent of seizing the moment. Seizing it, in ways like making sure to understand how the virus is working on healthy humans in real time with respect to continual testing to ensure they remain COVID free. It is simply not based in, logic, to disregard the importance of only a small part of the population is not healthy and strong in the midst of this pandemic. All healthy, strong unaffected people have to be given a chance to oversee and physically execute the society's "social distancing" functions.

I believe people are only, human, and that is ever more important when it comes to living in a Democracy of 'ostensible' free choices. The USA changed the law in 1964, to force the nation to extend equality to negros ---and 55 years later, we see how angry non-Blacks are, about being forced to view negros as humans. Yes therefore when a human/a group of humans, go decade after decade, fighting to be treated equal as the rest of the society ---yet never gaining that equal status? Then I believe that can cause any exclusive group to, give up*, and thereby give in to the grip of hatred which the dominant society has reserved for that exclusive group. * - life goes on even after the thrill of living is, gone, and it becomes obvious to everyone who notices a diminishing of a human's personal hygiene and personal health and personal responsibilities. Including the society refusing to extend equal/similar healthcare processes and medics to a group that's been singled-out to receive oppression or exclusion.

Yes, this was true long, long before covid 19 came along. Your link even alluded to it here: The way we treat negro people especially in the Western Hemisphere, remains, the Great Sin of Mankind. And CoronaVirus has only reinforced that dreadful reality.

...or... Why are some people on this site so, forgiving, of China's disregard for its fellow non-BRICs humans? For example, have you checked to see how BRICs nations got hit by COVID 19 ---or do you not find it peculiar? True. Altho the globalization efforts we live in have taken on more evil traits than you listed here. Assimilation is a dangerous one, for example, when it is a requirement of economic integration ---assimilation which targets the excluding of certain members from a society's progress. I think it's called fascism at that point.

Did China's intent with COVID 19, spell the end? https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19186444.2019.1615360?journalCode=rncr20 Global competitiveness of BRICS and Canada: implications for business Mark Kam Loon Loo & Badar Alam Iqbal Pages 97-108 | Received 03 Mar 2019, Accepted 18 Apr 2019, Published online: 28 May 2019 Download citation https://doi.org/10.1080/19186444.2019.1615360 Abstract Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) has 40 percent of the world population and shares 20 percent of the world’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). This paper seeks to evaluate business opportunities with the BRICS for Canadian businesses through a framework of global competitiveness. Global competitiveness is tracked over a 16-year period to evaluate each nation’s sustainability. Growth trends are compared over four 4-year periods between the BRICS and Canada. The results show nine areas of potential business, and identified China as the most viable partner for a more sustainable growth. The limitations of the study and recommendations for future research are then proposed.

Great thread theme. Trump set the tempo, last year, when he rose up against the Chinese GOVT with his trade war.........So it's time for other nations to increase their, courage, and copy Donald Trump's fearlessness.

...hmmmm...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoyrDJViKxc

This only proves that the road to absolute, tyranny, is paved by the evil wicked Dems pretending Roger Stone committed a crime here and Vindman should not be disciplined ---since he intentionally broke the rules, to be against President Trump. Yes. All you posted here were examples that the Dems are sore losers ---especially when Courts and Judges make legal rulings! Tyranny, looks like Joe Biden bragging about a quid pro quo he ordered in Ukraine. Tyranny, looks like the Dems filing false docx in the USA FISA Courts to get the Mueller investigation launched. Tyranny, is the likelihood that Dems helped China saturate the USA with covid19 so to wipe out older voters since older citizens usually vote for GOP Presidents every election.

Now you are using only your emotions to contest and to trivialize the facts within the vids. So I'm done here. Have a nice day.

IMHO social distancing does not mean, shut down the entire society. Infrastructure has to function. Social distancing cannot work for the general pop, in any other way. IMHO if you're going make an entire nation of people, stay home, then you have to have couriers and workers to get them their vitalities.

I hope you can be more, fair, toward the fact that only 0.008% of the American population has tested positive for the virus ---and only 1 out of every 30 of those few folks, are dying. When you combine that veracity with the COVID testing/employment conditions I mentioned above, Wal-Mart workers will be fine.

Since you couldn't be bothered to try to realize that those are not pro-Trump politicians in the videos, and they are unbiased Chinese citizens, then I'm choosing the vid's info over your research paper here. Especially since the vids do not claim, even once, that COVID 19 was created in a lab ---as the vids detailed how there were bats with the virus, housed within a GOVT lab located VERY close to the Wuhan wet market. HEAR more carefully.

No, I did not ignore any facts. I suggested how Wal-Mart can migrate those facts.

Please stop blaming me for your sexual, orientation, as I possess no keys to your Misery.

I have no control over your sexual, orientation, so please stop blaming me for your Misery.

Great theme! If anyone can go over to the Jane & Finch area or the Scarborough area, of Toronto, you will find proof IMHO that Canada has no plans to offer any thing supporting equality whatsoever ---to certain citizens, for sure!

I don't blame you, you should be worried if you didn't get any status notifications re: if you correctly completed the process or not. Perhaps you can login to your CERB account https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/e-services/e-services-individuals/account-individuals.html then ask some questions, through that portal. They'll be compelled to respond then. good luck

Yes, it has been determined. And it turns out that the COVID 19 bat was never sold at the Wuhan wet market. But the COVID 19 bat was housed in a Chinese GOVT lab located very close to the Wuhan wet mkt's locale. This statement might not be based in, logic, when you consider how much Reagan allocated to military spending and how much Bush41 allocated to military spending and how much Clinton allocated to military spending and how much Bush43 allocated to military spending and how much Obama allocated to military spending, equates to how they each allocated nearly the same % as Trump allocates to military spending ---plus they all hated China too, but none of them started a war with China. Obama even came off of the campaign trail, in August 2008, to write a letter/asking Bush43 to start a trade war with China.

lol @ how a wicked evil Dem "goes all Trump" whenever they flip out. Pretty absurd. Trump gets mad when Dems tell lies, whereas Dems get mad when lies are not being told.