Tdot

IMHO I simply do not see how this has anything to do with, if Trump has ultra thin skin or a fragile ego. Dishonesty in reporting should make all stakeholders angry ---even moreso, during a national health crisis. For example, plenty of famous reputable Dems (Dr. Drew, Dr. Oz, Rep. Ilhan Omar etc) have publicly criticized the way the Dem's big media machine has politicized the USA fight against this global pandemic. I thought their news dishonesty could never again be topped, at CNN & msnbc, when it came to Ukraine quid pro quo and the House impeachment. But this, Coronavirus reporting, really has literally thrown the disease out with the trash ---as now all focus is on denouncing every move Trump makes. I think the Dems have already shown, they will do absolutely anything to get the U.S. Presidency back.

If all Cherry ever did here was mention that group/identify that group in a factual way, then no, he should not have been fired nor even disciplined. Nonetheless, if he did in fact use derogatory speech or hate speech when referencing "you people" then surely HNiC execs cannot have his voice representing their brand. Especially if the HNiC execs have decided that they want to publicly embrace immigrants who don’t wear poppies for Remembrance Day.

For whatever is meant by, worry, is for sure a reality. Altho it is very very important to note that some people are not ever, worried, when simply trying to understand how others think. In order to love other humans, IMHO we should to be able to understand their feelings/their thinking and why they are worthy of being embraced. For example, I see it as very reasonable for any gays to desire to know their partner's outlook on procreation. Then on the other hand, I think if any heterosexuals have gay loved-ones who they embrace and spend lots of time around then it is very reasonable to want to know how they think about procreation and their role within it. No matter if we are gay or heterosexual, we each still enjoyed, some humans making the sacrifice/procreating to give us a life on earth.

Or is it like... Eating? For example... -we can love whoever we want or have sex with whoever we want ---but if we each plan to replenish the earth with humans or want others to replenish the earth with humans, we know/we accept that there must be sex between opposite genders. -we can eat whatever we want or drink whatever we want ---but if we each plan to be nourished to continue living, we know/we accept that the food and drinks must be healthy and safe for consumption.

Greetings. This is an interesting perspective. I bet it will be delightful if you expound on it more. I also wondered if you felt that it is an element of, nurturing, how 1)males' bodies do not develope breasts for feeding milk to other humans? And 2)every female body has this one orifice, right in the middle between her legs, which perfectly fits/perfectly receives only one (1) sole object on earth ---a male's organ which happens to be right in the middle between his legs? Are those body parts genderless, natural, coincidences? Are they signs that man and woman were meant to be together?