Yzermandius19

gun control doesn't make the world any safer that's just naive wishful thinking "making the world a safer place" is the excuse every tyrant uses, to justify their tyranny you're easily fooled into supporting tyranny as long as they blow empty platitudes up your ass invoking public safety

Alex Jones > Moonbox and ExFlyer nolo contendre

it's an anti-human cult, Malthusian AF the climate is just the cover to boost PR for something that is unsellable if they call it what it truly is this is how they sell naive people with good intentions, who actually want to help the environment, on their horrific agenda

historically humans have flourished during warm periods and struggled during cold periods the idea that a warm period is cause for catastrophizing is silly especially when humans are better at mitigating any negative effects than ever the solution is not harm the economy, the better the economy does, the more that can be done mitigate to the negative effects reducing CO2 emissions should not come at the expense of economic development yet only the worst possible solutions are acceptable to the extremists to them punishing humans is more important than helping the environment hence why they only accept solutions that punish humans and scapegoat anyone who wants implement better solutions as climate change deniers because it was never about the environment to them, that was just useful propaganda to sell their anti-human agenda

you not knowing a better answer isn't proof that your answer is correct arguing from ignorance there is no scientific consensus on the degree to which human activity is impacting the changes in climate and there is certainly no scientific consensus that human activity is the main driver in the current changes in climate there is only consensus that climate is changing and CO2 levels play a role in that conclusions of climate catastrophe are anti-science, yet these are the people who claim most vocerifously that this is the scientific consensus as if science has anything to do with consensus, in the first place, which it doesn't

it's called a fake consensus science doesn't agree with you you just pretend it does and then act like a large group of people believing in nonsense somehow makes it true appeal to authority and argument ad populum science is not a popularity contest science is not a consensus of experts science is a process it is on you to prove what you're saying is true you made the claim, it is not on the person not making the claim to prove it wrong that's not how science works, that's anti-science it's on you to prove it's true, and sighting popular belief or a consensus of experts doesn't do that

nonsense woke is what the woke call themselves lefties came up with it, to describe their ideology

lots of corporations are lefties not all the wealthy and powerful people are righties the media in particular is mostly lefties corporations aren't in favor of free markets corporations are in favor of regulated markets because they can afford to follow the regulations when their competition can't especially when they get a big say in those regulations notice how big media corporations are calling for the censorship of their competitors especially their competitors on the right

the FDA has the authority to do that the EPA overstepped it's authority that's the difference that's why SCOTUS stepped in when the executive branch goes too far, it's the judicial branch's job to tell them to f*ck off they don't just get to do whatever they want

say stupid shit you might get called out on it best learn to cope because you certainly aren't going to stop with the stupid shit

f*ck the EPA they overstepped the SCOTUS set them straight the precedent doesn't just protect the coal industry it protects anyone the EPA tries to f*ck with outside it's mandate you just want the coal industry punished regardless of the means so you don't want anyone getting in the way of their tyranny as long as it's directed at those you don't like but unlike you, SCOTUS sees that folly in that thinking

not sure how ExFlyer gets lean right out of that either other than the fact that he delusional things all the time

none of the corporate news sources are left CNN leans right two of the stupidest remarks ever typed get a grip, both of you

you know you hit the nail on the head when ExFlyer laughs boom headshot

your perception is false you avoid seeing the flaws in yourself by projecting them on everyone else what you see isn't there, it's in the one place you never look within

nah you laugh because you don't like the reality hammer hitting you on the head it's an obvious tell that you want to shield yourself from self awareness as a defense mechanism you laugh so you can convince yourself that you don't have to think and re-examine your dumbest ideas to maintain the bubble of stupidity you are comfortable in

projection is a helluva drug you just accuse others of shit you do all the time and think no one is smart enough to notice you throwing stones from a glass house

whenever ExFlyer laughs and goes ad hominem it's just a sign of his cognitive dissonance being triggered

it will peak prior to 10 billion that isn't an issue the aging and decline of the population will be a vastly bigger issue and it is already a problem today and will impact the economy for decades in a negative way with baby boomers entering mass retirement and nowhere near enough people to replace them Gen X is too small and didn't have enough Gen Z kids and the Baby Boomers didn't have enough Millennial kids either

the developed world lacks children and is well under replacement rate meanwhile the largest generation ever is going into mass retirement without enough adults to pick up the slack education is not the issue, the demographic pyramid inverting is though you were right fifty years ago but the demographic situation has changed massively during that time and now you couldn't be more wrong try to keep up

the problem is not bringing enough people into the modern world declining and aging populations is the issue

it was for the benefit of any industry against federal bureaucratic overreach

to hear their homes and to cook people still do it especially in poor countries that's what they did before coal could be used to generate power the use of coal improved the environment considerably yet people who don't know any history trash talk it as if all it does is pollute

we know that when you have no argument you immediately resort to logical fallacies to prevent any critical thinking on your part ad hominem and strawman being two of your favorites

their competition shit talking them with bullshit framing is not convincing being against the Communist Chinese is a good thing not bashing Trump for dumb shit is a good thing being against covid authoritarianism is a good thing them pissing off the MSM by not going along with their bullshit is a good thing try attacking the message instead of the messenger ad hominem is weak sauce