Yzermandius19

obvious outliers are not indicative of most specific to general fallacy

they assisted because if they didn't they would join the Jews most weren't given an option your WWII Eastern front knowledge is quite lacking

Americans aren't Nazi's and neither are the Ukrainians

because that Nazi liberated them from the Russians who genocided the Ukrainians

Ukrainians don't worship Nazi's they flipped to Nazi's side in WWII because they thought the Russians were worse then they flipped back, when the Germans f*cked them over too as usual you don't know your history you just cite Russian propaganda

no, that's just a non-sequitur

then it doesn't include Ukrainians either and it doesn't lump them in with other Eastern Europeans as you do nor does it compare Russian or Ukrainian stats with the Eastern Europeans so you need other stats to prove your point

your report doesn't mention Russians or Ukrainians specifically for all you know, they are both included in the Eastern European stats there is no reason based on your report to assume either commits more crimes than the other

Russians are Eastern Europeans your logic is stupid show a breakdown that reflects the crime stats for both Russians and Ukrainians separated from other Eastern European groups or you have nothing

I never made that claim you made the claim that Ukrainians commit more crimes and human trafficking you are lumping in Ukrainians with all Eastern Europeans when your comparison should be between Ukrainians and Russians particularly in regards to organized crime, since you mentioned human trafficking

not seeing a comparison of crimes committed by both groups particularly when it comes to human trafficking

prove it where's your stats? anecdotes don't count neither do pro-Russian/anti-Ukrainian biases

ha ha everyone knows that Russian organized crime dwarfs Ukrainian organized crime obvious troll is obvious

I can't sell logic to someone driven totally by emotion especially someone driven by resentment and envy of obviously beneficial things all your suggestions are tear things down in fact the things you want to tear down most are the very things that build things up the most and you have zero idea of how to properly replace them once torn down there is no reasoning with you, you are totally immune to it they don't come any more irrational than you facts don't care about your feelings

potentially sure but that isn't close to happening as the potential important members of the anti-hegemonic coalition hate each other more than they hate the West and even if they got along enough to hate the west more that coalition would very likely lose to the hegemonic coalition and they know it the main powers of Eurasia are too divided America has done a good job of preventing them from coming together in any meaningful way as each of the powers is closer with America than they are with each other and they would rather keep that relationship with America than jeopardize it by teaming up against them Brzezinski's strategy is working like a charm

1. economic growth leads to the technological growth that reduces pollution killing technological growth will simply lock in the kind of pollution you are constantly freaking out about 2. you couldn't even write that message on an internet forum when the earth was at 3 billion in population plenty of major innovations occurred after reaching that population mark 3. there was worse pollution before plastics, pipelines and machines these things reduced pollution, but you don't know anything about history so you think pollution only began after these things were invented 4. false, they invaded plenty of spaces and wiped out more forests prior to the industrial revolution they used to burn wood instead of coal for energy, but again you know nothing about history, luddite 5. the more people that escape poverty the more people want to clean up the environment the best defense against environmental degradation is reducing poverty wealthier countries also have less kids, so if you are so worried about high population levels, prosperity is the quickest path to that as well 6. wealth keeps the population from exploding poverty keeps the population exploding look at the countries with highest birth rates, are they rich or poor? they are poor look at the countries with the lowest birth rates, are they rich or poor? they are rich look at the countries with lowest birth rates today, did they have way higher birth rates when they were poor? yes, they did as usual, you're full of shit you can't be a real environmentalist while being an anti-capitalist, they are mutually exclusive being the later deeply undermines the former, you're a fake environmentalist who really is just anti-capitalist you're one the commies who hijacked the environmentalist movement to sell communism using a nicer sounding label

go ahead and try, DOJ I dare you whatcha gonna do when Grover Cleveland 2.0 runs wild on you?

not a crime

like I say it's not a pro-environment stance it's an anti-human stance this is the common denominator in cougar's immigration and environmental policies cougar just hates people and wants to punish them for existing and thriving then comes up with policy changes that impede their ability to do that cloaking that agenda by using nicer sounding buzzwords when trying to sell it to the rubes but at the end of the day cougar is just a misanthropic Malthusian who seeks to use the government as a weapon against the people he hates whose politics are driven by envy and resentment

the extra bodies fuel the economic growth of the goods and services you like they also help to invent things that improve the environment you claim to want to protect if you think pollution is bad now, it was far worse before the industrial revolution that you blame for ruining the planet it was far worse when there was a lot less people as well the deforestation you decry was far worse before fossil fuels started being used en masse for energy human prosperity is the environment's friend human poverty is the environment's enemy

you stfu if you live near too many people for your liking move to an area near less people it is not on everyone else to accommodate your desire by moving away from you or on the government to stop them from moving near you grow the f*ck up

Canada's birth rate is below replacement we are running out of people particularly younger people and you still complain about too many of them if your area is too crowded, move to a less crowded area

you know what my suggestions were I have repeated them to you on more than one occasion when you play this game now I'm sick of you pretending our previous conversations never happened and acting like you asking me over and over when you already know my answer is a reasonable request

.

I have posted many suggestions all the people asking me for suggestions right now have been given lots by me on many occasions then they later pretend that I never did if I don't constantly repeat myself you have already done this on numerous occasions, as has eyeball if a good faith poster wants some suggestions from me, then I will answer them but you two get nothing for being asshats