Yzermandius19

you have zero proof that isn't the case you can't prove it on a court of law

when the glob of cells is a human it's related that glob of cells you are fine with killing, will become aware of it's existence in short order like someone waking up from a coma is it cool to kill people in a coma that will wake up in a predictable amount of time, in your world? because that's immoral too all of the lines you draw can apply to fully grown humans in certain circumstances and those circumstance being the case doesn't make killing them not immoral you have no logical line you can draw that makes it okay, outside of killing in self defense

he didn't want them to manipulate votes he wanted them to be properly counted that's not a crime

killing humans is immoral if I kill you in your sleep it's not moral because you didn't see it coming it's not moral because you are a glob of cells it's not moral if I compare it to killing a cow or a spider

they already started it's not a secret they are open about it and you remain in denial about it because you stopped listening after the buzzword

the life of the child is equal to the life of the mother which is why killing it is immoral saying glob of cells is irrelevant

it is a child you don't get to pretend that being in early stage of development renders it's life not valuable and you don't get to say terminating that life isn't immoral

if you think that's all the woke are asking for you're more naive than I thought it's not a flag of inclusion it's a flag for a small minority

it is immoral to punish the child for the sins of the father the child is innocent it didn't rape anyone

one decision results in no baby being killed the other results in a baby being killed calling it a blob of cells doesn't negate the immorality of the action

not about inclusion they have long since been included now they want punish all cis people and gain special privileges on account of their oppression and everyone against that is a bigot this what the woke are calling inclusion now

joining the BRICS, that's the best you got? that doesn't refute anything I said that doesn't refute anything Zeihan said either the Dollar has a lot more shine, than currencies pegged to the dollar how is a currency pegged to the dollar going to take the place of the dollar? it's not, get ahold of yourself China is dependent on America countries that would prefer China to America are economically illiterate China has no allies, everyone prefers America if push comes to shove, no one is going to stand with China against America

there is nothing there Trump can tell them he wants them to find uncounted votes that's not a crime

argument ad populum you're the one in the bubble

Drumpf is done now where have heard that one before? wishful thinking is a helluva drug he is totally electable, Trump is more popular than any Democrat you project your dislike of Trump on America but America does not share your view of him

you have no evidence to back that assertion it's just your uninformed opinion based on your America Derangement Syndrome confirmation bias

yes they do the problem isn't the access anyone determined to mass murder people isn't going to be worried about obeying gun laws to do it if they can't get one legally, they can find a way to get one illegally this is true in any country yet mass shooting rates vary widely regardless because it's not about access

it's too late for Canada but Confederation was holding us back anyway so that's not a bad thing

I do, do that you are the one tunnel visioning on gun control because you have no real answers but want to virtue signal that you're "doing something" mass murderers are going to have access to tools they can commit mass murder with no matter how much gun control you implement focusing on that is a waste of resources to zero effect

tailor your policy proposals to reduce the drive of people to mass murder innocent people not to restrict and ban inanimate objects protip then you'll have more success actually helping to reduce the problem instead failing to address it entirely

I am speaking and sympathizing with them the media doesn't want to talk about it because they are anti-protestor the lawyers are worried about having their reputation damaged for defending them because of false public perception they do not deserve to be locked up for crimes they didn't commit, especially for this long this is Banana republic "justice"

it's a people issue not a guns issue yet your "solutions" are all about the guns not the shooters you want to address the wrong problem

they shouldn't have been charged or put in jail either they all get sympathy them being in jail has nothing to do with committing any crimes

if they were teaching inclusion I'd have no objection they are teaching exclusion and segregation and calling it inclusion to make you think it’s innocuous there's a difference you just can't tell the difference apparently because they used a buzzword you like to throw you off the scent of their bigotry

because the government are openly totalitarian assholes who don't give a shit about the law, just punishing their opposition