Yzermandius19

Wanh! Trump refuses to engage in needless wars any longer, and chase Middle Eastern Dominoes, what a dick! Derp.

The Mueller report revealed no crimes. Potential is irrelevant, proof is relevant. Impeachment will do nothing but make Trump stronger, he ain't getting removed with no proof of a crime, and even if they eventually find the proof which they don't currently have, it still might not work unless it's a particularly bad crime, lying under oath isn't even enough, as Bill Clinton shows.

If you have no proof of a crime, impeachment will never be successful in removing Trump from office, and will just empower Trump. Hell even if you have proof of a crime, it isn't likely to work, ask Bill Clinton if you don't believe me. It is not politically expedient to impeach with no proof of a crime. All the other polls show it's unpopular, even if the inquiry is popular, actually impeaching Trump is not, even according to your cherry picked poll.

If you don't have a smoking gun, then you've got nothing. Mind reading that you know what Trump meant based on text messages from a week before is not a smoking gun. If you don't have proof he did it, it's innocent until proven guilty, not guilty until proven innocent. The bar is supposed to be high, you dumb muthaf*ckah. If you don't have proof Trump was withholding military aid in exchange for a Biden investigation, then shut the f*ck up until you do. Enough of assuming he's guilty until proven otherwise because some breadcrumbs might lean that way if you squint real hard to try and see it.

1) Nothing wrong with asking for a favor from a foreign government, every single POTUS has done that, it's not an impeachable offense, it's how negotiating with foreign countries works dumbass. 2) You have no proof that the money being suspended has anything to do with investigating Biden, you just assume based on anti-Trump biased speculation. 3) Diplomatic speculation with no proof, is not proof of anything, just more lame attempts at mind reading. You have nothing.

Can't prove the favor is about Biden, in fact he refers to past favors the US did for Ukraine right after he mentions a favor, doesn't mention he's withholding aid in lieu of a favor either, he just says he wants them to do him a favor and you are jumping to ridiculous conclusions based on that. Trump doesn't mention Biden until Zelensky brings up Giuliani, which is much later in the conversation, long after the favor was mentioned, and Trump didn't bring it up the subject. Certainly no proof there is a quid pro quo, especially one that benefits Trump and hurts US interests. You got nothing. Trump is allowed to make deals with foreign leaders, and ask for favors, there is nothing inherently bad about that, that's the way it's suppose to work. You are literally just making sh*t up to paint Trump in a negative light, and don't have a clue what you're talking about.

It was like one page down, like a paragraph later, basically one minute later in the conversation, zero indication whether it's related to a quid pro quo or not. You graspin'. All these "whistleblowers" are turning out to be Democrat partisans, grasping at straws just like you. The President is allowed to say what he wants, the intelligence community has more important shit to do than try and out him for saying something they don't like, these "whistleblowers" are not to be trusted. Until they present rock solid evidence, they should be dismissed out of hand, sh*t or get off the pot. Speculation based on flimsy evidence, at best, is just using "whistleblower" status as cover for obvious partisan hackery, in a lame attempt to remove a President they know Democrats can't beat in an election.

Cold War, not Hot War. FTW Reagan knows, MAGA. Trump doesn't even have a Grenada on his resume either. So far, so good, indeed.

I like how people who are against unnecessary wars are now crying that Trump is a dick for not engaging in them, and side with Republicans whose foreign policy they have been against for years. If Obama did the same thing, they'd be singing his praises non-stop, and railing against all the Republicans who oppose him, but because it's Trump this time, all of a sudden they are all for being the world policemen, and they love the Neocons naow! Obvious hypocritical double standard is obvious.

Giving Trudeau the kid gloves treatment on that was a missed opportunity for the Bloc for sure.

Trudeau pissing away votes in Quebec to virtue signal about Bill 21 is pretty hilarious and politically inept. He's still probably too far ahead in Quebec for it to cost him the election, but seems like a net negative nonetheless. Liberal Minority looking slightly more likely than a Liberal Majority.

State owned propaganda outlets for the fail.

Concern trolling is what it is. Ain't nothing wrong with Trump rocking the boat, that's a feature, not a bug.

Canada is not worth conserving. /shrugs

Not at all. That's Trump Derangement Syndrome incarnate. Negotiating with Kim doesn't make you Kim.

Canada's lack of boat rockers is a bug that most Canadians think is a feature. Sad.

Comparing America to North Korea in this regard is laughable. America Derangement Syndrome is a helluva drug.

Not what happened. Zelensky asked about the Javelins and then like a minute later Trump asked for a favor, you cannot prove the two are related, you are just grasping at straws to claim Orange Man Done for the thousandth time.

Against affirmative action, I suppose even a broken clock is right twice a day, and for once Zeitgeist is actually right.

So you're against Affirmative Action?

Donald Trump is excellent at climbing the ladder, the Democrats keep falling over and over again and the fall is breaking them.

The Republican base expanded under Trump. Whether that's mostly on the Democrats for going crazy is irrelevant, that is still what is happening. Stop projecting on the American electorate, just because you wouldn't vote for them doesn't mean they wouldn't.

I like how Boges gives Biden the benefit of the doubt, yet every doubt that comes up is somehow proof of Trump's guilt, all with zero hard evidence like the kind that he is demanding in Biden's case. Obvious partisan hack invoking a double standard is obvious. And no Boges, just because a few other people are also playing by a double standard, giving Trump the benefit of the doubt and seizing on every doubt as proof of Biden's guilt, that doesn't give you a pass, they are being partisan hacks too. Being a partisan hack for the other team doesn't make you the "impartial" middle like you think it does, it makes you a partisan reactionary.

Scheer is a cuck, Liberal Lite. Bernier is the real deal who got screwed out of the nomination. Bernier is no traitor to conservatives, Scheer is. Taking down Trudeau is not so important that becoming Trudeau in order to make a lame attempt to beat Trudeau is acceptable, Bernier knows.

She is running to the left of Bernie Sanders right now, she is a total wingnut.