Yzermandius19

because the MP's are the Queen's representatives in the legislative branch the citizens are not representatives of The Crown, carrying out the duties of the state, on behalf of the head of state, they are subjects those who serve on behalf of The Crown, must swear allegiance to it those who do not serve on the behalf of The Crown, don't have to swear allegiance to it, if they don't want to, The Crown protects their right, noblesse oblige those who wish to serve The Crown, can do so of their own free will, those who do not wish to serve The Crown, are not forced to take on the responsibilities and duties of those who do

the likes of you calling me a snake badge of honor your ridiculous anti-freedom compelled speech being tied to the right to vote that is openly supporting the Nazification of Canada Fuck Canada and the Nazi's who demand people swear allegiance to a Fake Nation The Crown would never demand citizens swear allegiance to Canada to vote or even serve in the military The Crown doesn't even demand citizens swear allegiance to The Crown to vote either The Crown does not support your totalitarian bullshit and never will The Crown supports my right to be as anti-Canada as I want to be, as it should be GSTQ

Communists are not a monolith that's how America won the Cold War they stopped buying into the domino theory as much and exploited the fact that the Communists often hated each other more than they hated America only Nixon can go to China the Commies have always been vulnerable to divide and conquer just look at the woke, who turn on themselves all the time eating their own in the classic leftist purity spiral as a contemporary example they always do it, like clockwork French Revolution happens, then the left turned on each other, the result, Napoleon Russian Revolution happens, then the left turned on each other, the result, Stalin Chinese Communist Revolution happens, then the left turned on each other, the result, Mao no one kills more Commies, than the Commies themselves after the Commies seize power, the useful idiots who brought them to power, are swiftly thrown under the bus starved to death, lined up against a wall and shot, put to the guillotine, etc it's the way she goes

voter suppression over 9000 mandatory swearing an oath before voting is dumb it doesn't weed out the disloyal they can just pledge the oath and not believe a word of it and vote however they please plenty of those who would be against mandatory oath swearing would be loyal to the country America does not require it's citizens to pledge allegiance to vote loyal Americans would consider that totalitarian bullshit, because it is you should be able to vote for the destruction of Canada, nothing wrong with that, and you shouldn't have to pledge allegiance to it before you do Vive le Quebec libre!

how are the BLM riots not insurrection if the capitol riots are insurrection? the BLM rioters being crap at overthrowing Trump isn't my fault either they both are an insurrection or neither are you cannot claim one is and one isn't without being exposed as a partisan hack, who believes it's only an insurrection when the side you don't like does it

it happening at the capitol doesn't make it an insurrection the vote was never going to be reversed you can't even prove a sizable amount of them even went there to do that you just think that is what happened because the Trump hating media told you so not an insurrection, it was trespassing for the most part, barely even a riot, many BLM riots were far more riotous than the capitol riots

the existence of people who wanted Biden not to be elected doesn't make the capitol riots an insurrection anymore than the existence of people who wanted Trump removed from office made the BLM riots an insurrection if that is the case, then any violence in the streets is an insurrection

your point doesn't stand name one other insurrection in history that was as much of nothing burger as the capitol riots there isn't one, because the capitol riots were not an insurrection, the only people who think otherwise are blinded by Trump Derangement Syndrome

when you fire rockets from areas that surround civilians in high concentrations, that is using them as human shields so that when the other side fires back at who was firing at them, it results in collateral damage that your side can use as PR to demonize the other side and you fell for it Israel doesn't use it's citizens as human shields, Hamas does though you lack the knowledge, not the other way around

facts the free market will decide central planning will not "environmentalists" pushing central planning as the only solution are fake environmentalists using the environment as an excuse to control the economy they are central planners masquerading as environmentalists because their retrograde economics need better branding to sell any real environmentalist would see that the free market is an ally of the environment, not it's enemy and would seek to leverage that tool rather than counter-productively undermine it

Grapes FTW #youpeople

yes it does in order to be an insurrection there has be some actual threat to overthrow the government there never was, even for a moment if that is an insurrection then any protest against the election of a president while supporting another candidate for president is an insurrection and you've rendered the word meaningless such a protest happening at the capitol building doesn't make it an insurrection either if you think this an insurrection, I suggest you look into actual insurrections throughout history, and see how the capitol riots don't rate at all only the completely historically ignorant would suggest that was an insurrection

never cougar will simply accuse everyone else of the very thing cougar is doing rather blatantly such as knowing what one is talking about prior to posting, for instance throwing stones from a glass house projection is a helluva drug

you have posted no facts just your feelings I am the one posting facts and because they contradict your feelings you choose to call them lies, bullshit or misinformation you might live near logging devastation but that doesn't mean that the area you live in is indicative of the state of the rest of the rainforest the actual facts run against your emotional screed

fake news accusing everyone who knows more than you of not knowing what they're talking about isn't fooling anyone but you that you know what you're talking about the rainforest is protected by law, at least 85% of what is left isn't going to be consumed by humans these are facts, just because you don't like how the facts expose your lack of knowledge doesn't make them bullshit your feelings have no bearing on reality the BC rainforest is not in danger

before we started using coal and oil Europe clear cut most of it's forests when wood was the main source of fuel now those forests have bounced back as Europe became more wealthy the BC rainforest is already saved 85% of it is protected from logging mission accomplished what are you whining about? I'll post at my leisure as usual you are accusing others of doing what you are doing try following your own advice, think before you post

you want to save the rainforest? Brazil becoming prosperous is the best way as that happens more people will move to the cities far away from the rainforest and less farmers will be there and need to cut it down to create farmland if Brazil was dumb enough to cancel fossil fuels, that will result in more rainforest lost

your lame attempt at cancel culture is moronic you project your own faults on others

your threats don't scare me and they open you up to being sued speaking of arrogant

someone has to post something relevant unlike the nonsense you spew

projection is a helluva drug

they do that all the time what are you talking about? human hater

Rome collapsed for many reasons, climate change was a small part of it and not the predominant reason at all Rome benefitted greatly because of climate change too when the earth got warmer, that wasn't a bad thing, it's when it got colder that Rome suffered but that part never gets mentioned by the climate doom cult crowd who claim that global warming will doom us all despite global warming coinciding with human prosperity every other time it occurred during recorded history oil and coal will not last forever but they aren't going to vanish tomorrow either people have been crying "peak oil!" for decades and haven't even been close to right climate change is driven mostly by the sun, not humans human impact on climate change, has been vastly overstated and claims of a climate apocalypse are totally ridiculous even more ridiculous is blaming that apocalypse on humans thriving economically many in the climate doom cult are really just anti-human and anti-capitalist using the environment as cover for their vile ideologies either consciously or subconsciously they undercut many of the things that most benefit the environment while looking down on those who oppose those counter-productive measures and demonizing them as not caring about the environment like the hypocritical religious fanatics they are control of the economy and human behavior is actually more important to them than the environment they claim to champion the environment is simply the rubric they use to seize that control but they still act like sanctimonious prigs with an unearned sense of moral superiority regardless

you don't have a clue when they will run out and those claiming they do and that it's right around the corner are full of shit and have been proven to be full of shit time and time again assuming it will run out after only using it for such a short period despite constantly discovering massive amounts of it and technology to exploit those resources constantly improving is flat out retarded Malthus was wrong, he didn't foresee the industrial revolution he completely missed how human innovation completely changes the equation and how higher population levels which drove that innovation was a boon not a doom which results in mass starvation he made this mistake because he assumed the world is a zero-sum game where the only way to win is for someone else to lose by an equal amount with no win-win scenarios where wealth is actually created and all sides benefit he basically predicted the world was doomed right before it went through the biggest boom it had ever experienced it's hard to get more wrong than that but then again, Quarks and Quirks said the earth can only sustain a 1.8 billion population so hold their beer, Malthus

tree cover loss on the tropics was outweighed by tree cover gain in subtropical, temperate, boreal, and polar regions