H10

I thought justin trudeau was a populist?

I think it is good they examine white culture and white issues, after all, living in a majority white populated nation, how else will the students come to deal with whites around them if they don't know the problems whites have? Understand the entire construct of whiteness is critically important given all the racial holocaust involving whites and racist laws, and racism that continue to this day. I don't think there is a parallel between yellow, red or black people (at least in the west anyways) as there is to the problem of whiteness. I don't even think in north american context that the problem is French, italians, germans, or irish culture per se. Under the system of white supremacy "the problem is white people" Professor Robert Jensen, University of Texas.

I rarely agree with Rue. Whatever the case, the moeny will not help. The problem is corruption, all the donors of tory getting handouts on city dollar coming to collect their due. The city will become broke.

His bc was confirmed by hawaii state officials. This is much to do about nothing, just racist white wops and crackers angry that a president is black.

No, it gives voters the most choice.

Do you have a reputable source, ie a non-wikipedia source anyone can edit? And does maintained by mean it is owned?

Why are you against paid leave, he is not seeing patients, he is on leave. He is not guilty either, or not proven guilty, it is just all alegations at this point, so it would be wrong to strip him of his income for something the courts haven't found him guilty of.

From what I saw, the Brits kind of just layed around pretending to be friends with locals, and then try to weaken them and steal their land. I do know the brits tried to colonize haiti and that failed when they got their butt beat and they got ran out of Jamaica as well.

Then he would be on paid leave, he wouldn't operate, do you understand that he would not be there operating?

Would not matter because the libs and ndp votes along with green and bloc are largely intterchangeable, the conservatives will end up at the bottom of probbaly 60% of people's ballots. Around 30% will have them as #1, 10% will have them as second choice, and the rest of people are rabidly anti conservative.

Innocent until proven guilty, but since doctors work with such a vulnerable segment of society, probably best he be put on paid leave until the issue is resolved.

Toronto doesn't own the highways, the province does, they need permission from the province to do it and that is why Patrick Brown came out against it. Toronto can only levy taxes where the province has given them permission. The cities only have power that the province or feds have given them, they have no real power except what the province says they have. Tory is corrupt, he doesn't care if he loses the next election, he is just another Wynne. His goal is to steal as much money as possible until he is booted from office in shame. If the liberal government is dumb enough to approve the tolls, or arrogant enough, they might actually lose the 905 and therefore the election or at least become aminority government.

Not to you, if you were the natives or african canadians getting slaughtered and enslaved, raped and tortured and classed as not human by the british and french government. Canada doesn't have governor's, we have premiers, the "African Canadian" governor you brag about was appointed by the british because he passed for white and was mixed race and they thought he was white enough, ironically they only appointed him to be a weak governor because they wanted to blame him if America took BC away. In otherwords, he was the perect fall guy because he was not "Really white".

Ya there is a french version of commonwealth called the francophonie. The worst colonizer is hard to quantify, probably a tie between the British, Belgians, French and Germans and Russians. Sometimes Britain was generous as in letting Quebec keep French as a language, in other situations like in Kenya, South Africa or Australia they genocide the natives. Best colonizers were probably the turks because they were very multicultural and let the nations they colonize largely keep their culture and religion, but again, even they are accused of genocide in Armenia. To colonize someone, you cannot really be good. The heart of colonialism is taking resources from another group by force to enrich yourself, and if they resist, which they usually do, since colonialism is theft, you must kill the target to continue to steal. So you will find a pattern of genocide, mass murder, mass killings, from all colonialist from Hitler to Elizabeth to Edward, Victoria, Leopold whoever. Bolivia has just managed to not get genocided so badly because they could never convince enough white people to move into that dreary dull cloudy place in the middle of the continent. I'd say Arabs and Japs are tied for evil colonizer outside of Europe status.

He was influential in a very bad way like adolph Hitler, he was not important, because Canada has changed immensely since he was in the country, and this Canada doesn't recognize his racist Anglo white supremacist world view nor would he recognize it. Macdonald wanted to genocide french, chinese, and anyone else who ain't white, he would not want to be recognized on our money if he saw what our country was. And if you think refusing to do what police told you to do, being a racial minority in 1950s Canada was not risking your life, you have a very limited understanding of Canadian history, and the strange pattern of African Canadians doing that ending up dead. It takes alot more courage to stand up to a movie theatre full of people who want to kill you than to go onto a battlefield with a gun where you can at least fight back.

Your argument is the polls are inaccurate, yet you think combining inaccurate polls can give you an accurate poll, even though there are different polling methods used!\ There were accurate polls showing Clinton with the 48-46% lead over trump. This is the result, she lost the swing states as polls showed could go either way. People didn't lie to the pollsters. Trump brought in unexpected voters, Clinton scared of traditional democratic voters in swing states (african americans, progressives, white females, working class white men) in favor of moderate republicans. There are more progressives than any other group so she lost because she ran as a republican light. I have no clue why she would think that was a good idea. The republican lights got hammered by the tea party for the last 7 years and trump, cruz and carson hammmered them all in the primary. Dems lost because they ran the worse canddiate possible. A moderate republican called Hilary Clinton to face off against a tea party candidate. Clinton's numbers in large african american cities like milwaukee, detroit, philadelphia, miami, tampa, charlotte were way way down. And she needed their votes to win but ignored them. Trump offered them a new deal, Clinton offered themnothing but said she would give the HBCU's a check. Ok, but what about the other 85% who is not students?

You going to take away all the farms from the farmers getting free land for being here 100-200 years ago

This is the false contradiction tax and spend corrupt politicians are trying to set up. Tory went from claiming tolls were highway robbery to claiming we need tolls even though they raise marginal revenue. We already paid for the highway, we paid multiple times, we pay property taxes, sales taxes on vehicles and gas, provincial income taxes, gas taxes, estate taxes, licensing taxes and fines (which are really just taxes on drivers issued arbitrarily). How is it that every other highway in the province can be maintained without tolls but these two? Don't you see they are blowing all our money. Tolls will just mean more money wasted, reduced services, more gravy train and more waste of money. We have a more dense city than ever, so how do we end up with more taxes? We should have less not more! Rob ford was right, there is a gravy train in the city of Toronto, land developers have been given over $4.5 billion dollars in tax exemptions since Tory took office, why doesn't he close that loophole and pay for the roads? At the current rate, they will take every single dime you make. They will never run out of money to spend. And if the money is for transit infrastructure, why don't the ttc riders pay for it, after all they will be the beneficiaries?

LOL. I will never understand how Canada, Toronto, has so much taxes but such shody infrastructure. Oslo has 500k people, Toronto has 2.7 million people. It has 5 times the people and less subway stops. It has a similar tax rate. Toronto has so much corruption, from the mayor right up to the premier. I don't think the unions are even the tip of the iceberg, if the unions were well paid and did their job, that would be fine. What we have is contractors paid $100,000+ for a few days of work worth $100-$1000 dollars charging millions of dollars where $10,000 is suitable.

You are falsely assuming they are!

A proportional system would be silly because you'd never have a majority government and constant instability. Governments need the ability to get clear mandates so that they can govern effectively, we saw it with the whole harper minority governments, they were constantly going to the ballot box. Ranked voting allows people to get what they want.

Even if they did that, it would not work, because ranked ballotting gives an advantage to the 2nd place person, not the one with the least last places. I don't think many liberals would want to see the cpc win, but there are some.

Which stats book told you, you can combine slanted stats together and get an accurate sample? BY your logic I could sampe just rural voters and get an accurate number.

I strongly suspect the liberals are going to try to bring in ranked voting for all those years of conservative government winning because of vote splitting between the bloc, ndp and liberals and green party. They realize it will be highly advantageous to them. They have also seemed to reject proportional voting.

No because you can double count, and they are not all random, some samples had more liberals and dems than are in the gp.