Cum Laude

The Clinton campaign was in touch with Department of Justice officials regarding the release of her emails. Brian Fallon, Mrs. Clinton’s spokesman and former Justice Department staffer, appeared to have discussions with sources inside the DOJ about ongoing open records lawsuits requesting access to her emails while serving as secretary of state. In an email from May 2015, Mr. Fallon said that “DOJ folks” had “informed” him about the upcoming status conference in one of the lawsuits.

Mrs. Clinton argued for “a hemispheric common market with open trade and open borders.” Mrs. Clinton’s dream for America looks a lot like the European Union. She reportedly told investors in a paid speech to Brazilian Banco Itau in 2013: “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, sometime in the future with energy that’s as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere.” Without borders, there are no countries, including the United States.

The State Department paid special attention to “Friends of Bill.” After the massive 2010 Haiti earthquake, a senior aide to then-Secretary of State Clinton repeatedly gave special attention to those identified by the abbreviations “FOB” (Friends of Bill) or “WJC VIPs” (William Jefferson Clinton VIPs), referring to the former president. The emails show Mrs. Clinton’s State Department prioritized and benefited Mr. Clinton’s friends in the $10 billion recovery effort. The State Department also polled the popularity of Mr. Clinton in Haiti and shared the results with him.

It's quite obvious from this thread that canadians SURE know their hockey, eh?

The Wikileaks situation gets little airplay on Canada's CBC. Hillary wants open borders of the whole Western Hemisphere – leaving the United States open to predation from Hispanic and Brazilian criminals and mafias from every Nation in South and Central America. Add to this the “special” (continual) importation of 3rd Worlders from Africa and Asia. We’re toast if she gets in and this continues. Still like Assange, Leftists? Or is it too much Truth for your weak stomachs?

Has anyone studied the Plutonium Ultimatum? The US really should’ve contracted Russia to build that MOX plant in South Carolina. But then, these wasted 7 billion dollars would remain in the US budget and the plant would be processing plutonium rods for US nuclear power plants, which will soon ran out of fuel, and the theme of the Kremlin plutonium counter-sanctions not even been able to appear in the most desperate heads of super-turbo professional patriots. Our American friends never look for the easy way out and simple solutions: the road to the disco in the neighboring village they always navigate over the Himalayas. By indirect actions Kremlin will now decide how and what and at what stage will be spent not only the US defense budget, but not the small budget of the US Department of Energy. Obama/Clinton Administration dumped the entire US and Canadian uranium market into the Russian hands for unsubstantial (relatively speaking) bribes through the Clinton Foundation. Clintons not just sold the energy future of the United States, they sold it cheap Civil Defense drills with 40 million paricipants. Even with late USSR was never like this, and here we go again. Our American friends can not dig what I call the prewar strategy of nuclear ambiguity. This is where all joint operation collapsed, American control and exchange of information is fully terminated, the place of the dislocation of nuclear weapons and materials, and even phone numbers of all the participants, have changed. Americans themselves lost the technology to enrich uranium for nuclear power plants, South Carolina plant closed without producing a gram of fuel, free-of-charge Russian plutonium stocks are exhausted: they now secretly remove uranium from the ancient American ground rockets standing on duty, otherwise nuclear plants will stop. Nuclear bluff as a bluff with gold bullion is very profitable thing; we are not talking about measly 300%.

To is not a typo. To when it should have been too reveals a lack of education. Tsk tsk, cyber, tsk, tsk, eh?

The key word here is dumb, when the OP used the wrong "to" in the title. It should actually be "too" cuberbuddy. Canadians....LOL, eh?

What sexual assault? Billy C's? Trump, having apologized for his words of a decade ago, said that the publication of the record is an attempt to distract voters’ attention from the really serious problems facing the United States, and, judging by the voter’s, they agree with him, not with the hypocrites of the Republican Party elite. In any case, even after this scandal, experts in opinion polls from Fox5 channel could not outrun their colleagues from CNN and attribute to Clinton’s advantage of more than 5%. But they seriously calculated using these figures to convince Trump to withdraw his candidacy, but he angrily rejected such a possibility, and promised in return to raise the question of the relation of Hillary Clinton to the victims of sexual violence. And he hinted that it’s not just about her protection of her husband, who almost became impeached in connection with the “non-sexual” relationship with Monica Lewinsky in the Oval Office of the White House and is related to the recording of a young lawyer, Hillary Clinton, that recently appeared on the Internet. In this record, Hillary Clinton, laughing, said on the sidelines of the court that, after her client was able to pass polygraph test to prove his innocence, she lost all confidence in this device. The problem is that this client was accused of raping a 12-year-old girl and a lawyer, Hillary Clinton won the case, accusing the victim of immoral behavior and almost of prostitution. As a result, the girl was hospitalized in a psychiatric institution, the rapist was freed to repeat his crime, and the lawyer, who achieved this 40 years ago, now is trying to break into the White House, trying using anecdotal accusations not just to win against Donald Trump, but also to prevent a serious discussion of the problems, facing the United States.

I wonder how many Democrat and Republican politicians who are "disgusted" with Trump's WORDS have used the talents of an escort to "relieve" pressure? Let’s analyze the debate without the shrill hyperbole. Cooper wasted no time to bring up the p*ssy comment. When he received an apology, he did not relent, he used it as an opportunity to recover any journalistic credentials he never really had. So intent on throwing out his “tough” questions he ignored, and cut-off, the answers. Here’s the thing, Trump was not a politician at the time. he was a jet-setting billionaire bon vivant running a beauty pageant. He was not a public official. If it was Mick Jagger, or Snoop Dog it would not matter. It would be laughed at. The total hypocrisy is the fact that in the audience was a former president, and potential first-philanderer, who penetrated an intern with a Cohiba and then placed it into his mouth before receiving oral sex in a government office. He had sex (oral) with an intern in a government office, but they dare bring up Trump carrying on about grabbing a girl’s “p*ssy”? Really. Men do at times talk this way. If people, and especially women, don’t think they do, then they are only lying to themselves. We then have Clinton blaming the Russians again. We then have her defend the totally ironic position of American strategy to defeat Assad, allow the destruction of Syria, the spread of ISIS, rather than defeating ISIS first. The insane US policy of WANTING Assad, first and foremost, to fall is the cause of the dire situation in “what is Aleppo?” Here’s the answer: Aleppo is when you are not content with initiating and fomenting regime change in a part of the world despite the deaths and suffering of millions. The media last night set the tone so they could lament it in a week’s worth of press afterward. “Scandalous” by their very making. It took 2 unhinged moderators to deliver it. Now, more hypocrisy and feigned indignation… to sell, sell, sell the spectacle. Wake up dummies.

Words are so clumsy. But I see the essence of what you say. What we create we can also destroy. Is there a difference between sophistry and philosophy ? Beats me. But it saved my life once so I am keen on the subject.

Americans are witnessing the crackup of the Post Cold War American electoral strategy of “Nice White Woman”, ironically brought about by Clinton in 92 and partly destroyed by Hillary and her obnoxious nagging establishment feminists. While establishment feminists and polygamist Mormons on the same scolding side of the boat, capsizing is imminent. America and the West have since 1992 pandered to the sensibilities to that figment of our imagination the Sainted Woman so electoral politics and our government reflect that and address everything in a small minded, petty and vindictive manner as women do when challenged.

They say you get the leaders you deserve. In a land of twerking, gender confusion, and disintegrated families, I’d say that is about right.

Where did I say they would make the final? I knew that they would be competitive in this gimmick that captures the hearts of canadians.

Well, now you know whyTeam Europe's success was nothing amazing. Move on, lad.

In a one game showdown, any of those teams could have won any game. International hockey has become boring. 1980...now that was amazing. A team of professionals assembled for a short tournament should amaze no one, except those who don't understand the game.

Ignorant? When were you last in Texas or Arizona? Illegals are taking advantage of the open/porous border. But I guess you know all sitting atop your perch in Keebec.

Are illegal immigrants not taking advantage of open borders. Open borders exist on the Mexico/USA border. Where have you been lately. We're taken here.